Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My team and I are doing a Worldwide Scavenger Hunt whilst raising money for these guys www.snehalaya.org


I live round the corner but at work so will miss the royal visit :(


If anyone is feeling really generous and fancies trying to get our logo photographed with a royal, it would help our cause immensely!


We're doing a charity event in Hyde Park on Sunday morning too for the few of you that don't have anything better to do on Mother's Day!


Look for us on Twitter #wearthefoxhat


Thanks!- K

less than 50% of the poulation voted this mob in that run the country and yet 64% of the population(Mori 2009), would, if asked, vote to keep the monarchy... you're in the minority Louisa!! I'm getting my bunting out now and painting my face with the red white and blue of my National Flag!

Nick1962 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> less than 50% of the poulation voted this mob in

> that run the country and yet 64% of the

> population(Mori 2009), would, if asked, vote to

> keep the monarchy... you're in the minority

> Louisa!! I'm getting my bunting out now and

> painting my face with the red white and blue of my

> National Flag!


Hmm clearly not very good at maths are you? 36.1% voted Tory and 23% voted Lib Dem at the last election. That adds upto 59.1% of the total number of votes cast in favour of the two parties who formed the

government. Of course it isn't ideal, but at least people got a say

in who was elected on their behalf. And most important of all, we can kick them out if they're doing a crap job. Our head of state, the monarch is unelected and we never have that right to go to the ballot box to choose a new one, we are therefore not a true democracy! I think monarchies of all description are parasites, and this is why so many states around the world have chosen to remove them and all that they stand for. It is an outdated institution that most who support it fail to come up with a legitimate argument to support it's democratic credentials. Jamaica wants rid, the Aussies will be next, but us lot in the UK seem determined to live in the past, no wonder Scotland wants out!


Louisa.

I saw them drive past whilst sipping my soda outside the Dog. Some fella in a van was just backing out into the road as they were trying to come past so the Lead rider was screaming at him to go back in. They passed nice and slowly because of that.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nick1962 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > less than 50% of the poulation voted this mob

> in

> > that run the country and yet 64% of the

> > population(Mori 2009), would, if asked, vote to

> > keep the monarchy...

>

> Hmm clearly not very good at maths are you? 36.1%

> voted Tory and 23% voted Lib Dem at the last

> election. That adds upto 59.1% of the total number

> of votes cast


Hmm clearly not very good at reading are you? ;-) Nick's referencing the electoral population of the country whereas you're referencing the number of votes cast. The reasons why voter turnout generally hovers between a paltry 60 and 70% is probably a topic for another thread.

> > -----

> >

> Hmm clearly not very good at reading are you? ;-)

> Nick's referencing the electoral population of the

> country whereas you're referencing the number of

> votes cast. The reasons why voter turnout

> generally hovers between a paltry 60 and 70% is

> probably a topic for another thread.


Well in that case what does that have to do with democracy? My argument is about people being democratically chosen by the people, if some people of voting age choose not to vote them surely that is their loss at not taking the opportunity to change things? My point is we cannot change the monarchy even if we wanted to! We can change our government. If he chooses not to explain himself or go off topic that isn't my problem it is his!


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...