Jump to content

woolwich turning into a betting shop? (Lounged)


Recommended Posts

Louisa, I also hope you are not generalising when you make comments about "working classes". I just like good quality Italian food. I work hard for my money and have no desire to lose it down the drain on a gee gee. My views about betting are not ones I care to share with a forum, everyone to their own I say....mine is Italian food!!
Yeah, too right. At least the "middle class people" have a choice where they wish to spend their money. Some kids and their mothers do not. When the bullying father/partner is so addicted to betting and gambling that his family go hungry and without basic necessaties, living in constant fear of his abuse and violence, it doesn't matter what class they are.
Why is this issue turned into a middle-class versus working class one? Shades of Student Union 1972 but surely a bit dated now, since we're all consumers of one kind or another, and not divided by wearers of bowler hats and cloth caps.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You been reading Dickens again


This is no story, my friend. It, really did happen. These are real people, in the real world. As for this issue becoming a class war, it isn't. Addiction knows no class.

"Why is this issue turned into a middle-class versus working class one?"


Because Zebedee, the issue of betting shops, as opposed to the opportunities for betting, until recently only available to the wealthy, has always been a class issue. The area I was brought up in had a restrictive covenant that prohibited betting shops and fish as chip shops, but the council estate a mile away had plenty of both.


What we may have in ED are tensions between indigenous residents and newcomers, with a clash of expectations and/or nostalgia for ED as it was before gentrification took hold. We may not be divided by virtue of wearing bowler hats and flat caps anymore, they have, arguably, been replaced by baseball caps, trackies, certain clothing labels, hoodies (the people who wouldn't have experienced student union politics, and certainly not in 1972 when only a tiny percentage of people did) as opposed to whatever modern city (and Foxton's) workers are wearing these days.


I do think that social grouping (what classless America tends to refer to as white and blue collar) has an affect on the general perception of betting shops, and while I don't object to them, I'm am wary of establishments that are only run with the only purpose of encouraging a potentially addictive past-time for a lot of people. I'm aware that the same argument can be used against pubs, but they do not tend to run exclusively for the purpose of selling alcoholic drink these days .


What's your view on the issue of more betting shops in ED? You didn't enter into discussion about the subject, and tell us.

Personally I don't feel that there is a need for another betting shop. However, in order to dispel any suggestion that I am thoroughly bourgeois, arguably there are too many restaurants and yummy mummy shops for the 4 by 4 brigade as well. This is why I have already suggested a new type of unit for the area - a brothel. This would be class-neutral since there would be 'escorts' in all price groups. And to avoid accusations of sex and sexual orientation bias, there would 'escorts' from both, if not all, sexes.

Zebedee Tring Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Personally I don't feel that there is a need for

> another betting shop. However, in order to dispel

> any suggestion that I am thoroughly bourgeois,

> arguably there are too many restaurants and yummy

> mummy shops for the 4 by 4 brigade as well. This

> is why I have already suggested a new type of unit

> for the area - a brothel. This would be

> class-neutral since there would be 'escorts' in

> all price groups. And to avoid accusations of sex

> and sexual orientation bias, there would 'escorts'

> from both, if not all, sexes.



:))

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lounged - no longer about "woolwich turning into a

> betting shop" it is now about class, yummy mummies

> etc etc


Another quality hijack by Louisa, nice work. Is it just me or is this type of snobbery just as bad as every other you're-different-therefore-I-hate-you rubbish that people spout. In fact, I find this insipid sort of attitude far worse as it is dressed up as a 'goodie' fighting against the forces of 'evil'. It's just as bad as any other hatred, based on nothing but our differences - racism, homophobia, religious intolerence etc and those spouting it should be ashamed of themselves.


Is there anything wrong with buying a takeout coffee on the way to have a quick flutter? No. Maybe splurging the winnings (if you are lucky...) in the scruffy much loved book store on the Lane and maybe picking up a little cute t-shirt for one of the kids on the way home? No. The Lane quite nicely reflects the mix of people in the area and goes to show that most of us can get along without having to pick on our differences to start a ruck instead.


Do we need another bookie next door to a bookie who has another branch less than a block away (cnr Crystal Palace Rd & Northcote)..? Not really. I can think of a dozen things I'd rather see there but I won't use it as an excuse to launch a bigoted rant, unlike some on here.

I hate gambling more than I hate other addictions, probably because it wasn't one of mine!


My knee jerk reaction is to stop poor people being ripped off by the big business bookies by having all new applications (including super casinos) blocked, but I am willing to accept it may not be as simple as that.


I think my view of bookies, is the same as most Daily Mail reader's view of big drug barons, so maybe I need to try to be more open-minded on the issue.


Maybe small bookies, run by local people may be more acceptable than huge theiving chains of bookies and lets not forget Bingo. They are not friendly little games run by old fogies, they are serious businesses now and a lot of women end up in debt going to the big business bingo places.

LMFAO


Anti-gambling tosh, my nan went to Bingo once a week until she died and it was on of her major pleasures in later life. Plenty of people like a flutter and enjoy it (and mainly don't win) without getting into any 'problems'......big business rant LOL....shall we picket Sainbury's? - they make a far bigger profit than William Hill and do, genuinely, put small businesses out of business - see the Dulwich Society thread for the effects that Sainsbury's opening on Dog Kennel Hill had on local businesses - I sugest you look at your own prejudices and stop trying to spoil what mllions of poeple like just cos it's not your thing....DO GOODER

PreferToRemainAnon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Is there anything wrong with buying a takeout

> coffee on the way to have a quick flutter? No.

> Maybe splurging the winnings (if you are lucky...)

> in the scruffy much loved book store on the Lane

> and maybe picking up a little cute t-shirt for one

> of the kids on the way home? No. The Lane quite

> nicely reflects the mix of people in the area and

> goes to show that most of us can get along without

> having to pick on our differences to start a ruck

> instead.

>

> Do we need another bookie next door to a bookie

> who has another branch less than a block away (cnr

> Crystal Palace Rd & Northcote)..? Not really. I

> can think of a dozen things I'd rather see there

> but I won't use it as an excuse to launch a

> bigoted rant, unlike some on here.


Your first post is great - just the sort of thing to get people hackles rising - or was that the intent? In no way bigotted, just a nice reasoned arguement. I suspect you have been on this forum posting as someone else as the language you use and what you say belies your 2 week registration.

"I sugest you look at your own prejudices and stop trying to spoil what mllions of poeple like just cos it's not your thing....DO GOODER" - isn't that what I said in my post?


And as for Bingo, it may have been more of a harmless bit of fun in the past, but the big chains go for the hard sell and I personally know 2 women who have nearly lost their homes to their bingo addiction.

  • 3 weeks later...

alba Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is a planning application up on the window

> for a betting shop on the old Woolwich building

> society site. Right next to the massive William

> Hill. I seem to remember there was a campaign

> against William Hill before it opened. Does anyone

> know why that failed and if there's any hope of

> stopping this new betting shop not getting in?(I

> forget what the name of this new betting shop is,

> not one I'd heard of before)


Alba started all this back in December with a simple question. There has been a lot of talk since both for against and, dare I say, unrelated to the original question. How about a simple response i.e YES for I want it and NO for I don't want it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...