Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This morning I got a parking ticket for parking across a dropped kerb in front of some old gates opposite my house. No-one has taken a vehicle in or out of these gates for many years, probably decades.


Because we live in an area of high parking pressure, we have parked across these gates and so have many others for the past 15 years and I have never got a ticket and I?ve never seen anyone else get a ticket, so I assume the usual parking enforcement officers turn a blind eye.


Any thoughts on how I can appeal this? Yes, I have parked across a dropped kerb but I have not obstructed any access and I think I have a reasonable expectation that it?s OK to park there after doing so for so long.


Secondly, is there any process for dropped kerbs being revoked?


All thoughts appreciated.

I'm sorry to say that I doubt you will have grounds for appeal, though others may know and advise you more positively.


There has been a recent significant increase in parking warden activity in my area at least, presumably in preparation for the likely imposition of CPZ by the council.


I am under the impression that parking across dropped kerbs is a no-no. If I am correct I would not expect any leeway from the council. They want your money after all!

So Southwark?s site says:


Driveways that serve a single property


If there's no enforceable yellow line, you can park close to this type of driveway without penalty. We only enforce if the occupier of the property makes a specific request.



In my case there is no yellow line so that?s my appeal.

If the dropped-kerb is marked with the white line, I doubt there's any point in appealing.

If there was no marking painted on road, you could perhaps speak with property owner and ask if they can confirm to you in writing they do not use the thoroughfare so you can include in your appeal.

Why aren't people more supportive of those carrying out their job responsibilities? Maybe in this case a blind eye has been turned to certain parking issues but presumably the restrictions are there for a reason. And maybe you've got away with it for a very long time! Yes, Southwark need to look at increasing revenue but surely this sort of activity is fine?

This is ridiculous.


Would you mind me asking what street you are on?


I basically answered no/not sure to the CPZ survey basically because of the amount of similar types of unused dropped kerb/gates on my street, which would have had double yellows extended for 2m either side even though they haven't been used in years!

edanna Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So Southwark?s site says:

>

> Driveways that serve a single property

>

> If there's no enforceable yellow line, you can

> park close to this type of driveway without

> penalty.


My understand is you parked across as opposed to "close to". Good luck but I'm not optimistic for you.

It?s Fellbrigg Rd - North cross Rd end. Johnjohn you are so right - there are loads of these dropped kerbs around belonging to former business/industrial premises that are no longer used. Put 2m of yellow lines either side of these and you?ll have a no parking zone of 7-8metres all for no reason. There should be a way of declaring dropped kerbs not in use.

Rules about parking across dropped kerbs/driveways generally seem to be pretty unclear and are the subject of much Internet hearsay. Some people say it's not an offence at all (even if the driveway is in use) whilst others say it's only an offence if you prevent someone accessing the public highway (i.e. driving out of their property onto the road, but not the other way around.)


Whatever the circumstances here, the PCN (Penalty Charge Notice) should provide details of how to appeal, assuming it's one issued by or on behalf of the council and not by some dubious private parking enforcement firm. If it's the former the appeal process should be free so I suggest you go ahead by providing the basic facts as you've described them above. My hunch is that you will be successful as it doesn't appear from your description that you were actually causing an obstruction or contravening any rules. Anyway, it doesn't hurt to try! Don't leave it too long to appeal though so you don't risk incurring the full charge rather than the discounted rate.


Several people on my road park over their own driveways, often because modern cars are a little too big to fit easily (if at all) and, to my knowledge, none of them has ever received a ticket.

Best not to rely on internet hearsay; better to consult the Law.

Traffic Management Act 2004 Section 86 states you must not park across a dropped kerb, but gives exceptions including:

"where the vehicle is parked outside residential premises by or with the consent (but not consent given for reward) of the occupier of the premises. This exception does not apply in the case of a shared driveway."


The Council has the power to put double yellow lines across a dropped kerb thereby cancelling the occupier's right to give permission.


The OP does not seem to have the occupier's permission. There must be due process for removing a dropped kerb, but I don't think you can legally assume that it is redundant. It may be needed for emergency access.

MarkT

Yes there?s a sign saying do not park but vehicles are never ever taken through the gates. There?s a load of junk behind them so it wouldn?t be possible to get a vehicle in.


theron Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Edanna, I saw your car being ticketed this

> morning. There is occasional access to the

> gates/garage or whatever it may be, and there is a

> sign that says ?do not park?, if I?m correct?

I know that Bodsier - kerbs dropped for pedestrians are totally different and I would never block one of those.


bodsier Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The DROPPED CURB IS ALSO FOR disabled PROPLE WITH

> Wheels of sorts to enable them to cross the road.

> It's not just for cars. Therefore you may not

> succeed in your appeal

Hi, my neighbour was ticketed for parking across the dropped kerb in front of my house. She successfully appealed, because I wrote a letter to the appeal adjudicator. All I confirmed in the letter was that the garage had long since been converted, meaning there was no exit being obstructed, that this was widely known in the neighbourhood, and that all the neighbours including Ms X had my ongoing permission to park in front of my house.


Wardens stopped enforcing after that.


?then they put a double yellow line over it, in the latest round of new painting! So no more parking for me or anyone now.

There's an old dropped kerb in our street that now has a brick wall built across where the cars used to go.It seems unfair that anyone could be penalised for parking there. I'm not talking here about the council's recent access dropped kerbs, just old redundant ones.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Time will tell if H&B are loved or loathed, the footfall they get and generate will determine if they stay or go. That's the nature of businesses, they come and go dependant on usage. Examples are M&S, Poundland Local, Co-op, Superdrug, Mons, the chain restaurant/takeaways, the chain Estate Agents, Toolstation, Screwfix to name a few.  As much as people would like to see Lordship Lane remain a high street of independents, it is becoming clear that due to Landlords hiking rents, some are unable to survive. This leaves empty units which some of the chain brands considering it to be worth a "punt". I'd have thought that businesses operating in shops is a better alternative than a high street with multiple empty units, but what do I know, they are just thoughts on the subject.   Take a look at Croydon and Bromley where what were once thriving high streets are in decline.  I have to say that some of the prices charged by the independents are eye watering, and incomes i'd have thought have to be substantial to afford their prices. Personally I'd love a Lidl to open on what was the site of the Harvester, but I guess that would get shouted down, oh the thought of Lidl in Dulwich. Whatever next. 
    • IMO, Sealy, the best nights sleep you'll ever have.  
    • I don’t know what the shop was originally next to the big St Christopher’s but if Holland and Barrett are taking it over then surely it’s good to have a choice on Lordship Lane? The Camberwell H&B is always empty but the Brixton branch busy.  I remember when the Marks & Spencer food shop was Iceland? Now the M&S is a very busy store and at the time regenerated the high street!
    • Nor would I have done, but it came up when I googled John Lewis reviews. Do you not trust TrustPilot reviews? Even allowing for the fact that many people only post reviews when they have had poor service, 27% one star reviews is indicative of something wrong, I would say. That's 27% of 76,392 reviews. That's an awful lot of people who don't  think the service they got from John Lewis was even worth two stars, let alone more. Screenshot attached.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...