Jump to content

Southwark council now introducing a ray of charges, strapped cash, or generating more??


Recommended Posts

The London Borough of Southwark have or are proposing extra charges in the borough, which has an affect of ED residents.


New charges to park at the lovely parks we have.


New charges for the brown bin / brown sacks.


Proposed new charges for a CPZ in the ED and West Peckham areas.


Increase Council tax bill


Is this the start of a strapped cash local authority, or an alternative to generate cash?

All councils are short of cash - the question is how do they generate it if government isn't providing enough and council tax can't be increased by more than a certain amount..


Do you generate cash from things people choose to do or things people need or even fines for littering and smoking or can we go after business somehow,if so what size ?


We (the residents of Southwark) should decide this so what we need is truth at the local elections (maybe ?).

The alternative when a council is short of funds is to look internally to see where savings can be made

E.g. Reduce top executives pay , golden handshakes and so on


Or stop rewarding failure , caused by departments spending all their funding to ensure they retain the same amount for next year, classic example is highways who implement a raft of unwanted works at the end of each tax year but plead poverty when pot holes need to be repaired. Why not try asking them to bank unused money each year, still get the same funds next and when money is needed it's in the bank ? (I realise it's a change in legislation and attitude)


There are possibly many savings and ideas to be had to maximise the existing inwards revenue, but sadly a council isn't run like a business or charity, it seems to be have the ability to spend more then it generates, expecting central government, residents and businesses to pay more for "essential" services and bail them out.



On a simple note, still can't work out why they relocated to a purpose built office in London Bridge, the most expensive area for real estate and associated charges when it would have been cheaper in the south of the borough , like Peckham or Camberwell, with the benefit of council officers purchasing items (lunch, shopping....) close to where they work thus benefitting the local economy and strategic growth of these areas. Mad decision

When they did locate all services to Tooley Street they found the building was too small and so had to get a another building in New Cross. So Tooley Street was North and New Cross South.


Many of the closed neighbourhood housing offices were sold off.


Also I believe I read somewhere that Southwark is purchasing commercial properties for revenue.


There does seem to be a large pot of money somewhere to be able to do this.

So much has been wasted in the economy on Brexit so far I don't see things improving in the next few years. No excuse for wasting local funds but I expect that LAs will continue to be hit by central funding.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Bob  Do you have property in Devon as well ? You sound like the busy body neighbour in this article 😅 https://www.devonlive.com/news/property/busybody-neighbour-upset-dont-use-10165200
    • I'm not saying that at all - I think it's great to have nice spaces. But it is already pushing out the smaller stalls - you can't deny there is a plan of gentrification
    • Come on people, do you really enjoy the current dreary passages outside station or would you prefer a light airy entrance which, as one of the main ways in to Peckham, would welcome visitors rather than making them feel it's a grotty run down area ?  The station building needs exposing after so many years of being hidden behind ugly facades and this will help change views of Peckham as a run down shopping area which may help bring more inward investment in the area, help reduce the perception of crime (open spaces are harder to grafitti for example) and help make it a destination again much like when it was called the golden mile (1960s) Personally, the removal of the ugly buildings in front of the station is a good thing.
    • You think efforts should be made to ensure public spaces in Peckham are ugly because it's 'more in keeping with the area'?! Dare I say that this is pretty disparaging towards the people you seem to think you're standing up for. Basically, less affluent people can't be trusted with nice things.  Personally think it's great that there is going to be investment in improving the public realm and making the station more accessible. Why should only the wealthier parts of Southwark get funding for this kind of stuff?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...