Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Agree. I've had it for nearly a year, works effortlessly. If you can pick up a good deal for the passes then it's a cheaper solution for TV. For example you can get 6 months Sky Movies and Sky Entertainment for ?56. It's for new customers only but you can just keep creating new accounts :)

thanks guys - all very good to know!

so here is where i am a little bit thick...

our current Sky package is their cheapest one at 24 MB a month and NOW TV's Brilliant Boradband is saying speeds of up to 7mbps - am i missing something here? Are people above talking about the Brilliant package?

Thank you for all your help!

7mbps isn't a lot of download speed but it could be enough - depends what you want to do and how many people in the house using it - I found this for you


https://www.which.co.uk/reviews/broadband-deals/article/what-broadband-speed-do-i-need which explains it all nicely.


https://www.comparethemarket.com/broadband/content/broadband-for-streaming/


We ended up with Sky Fibre as we got a deal - and it's great


The NOW TV deals included line rental so sounds really good

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yeh, this put me off going there.  Think Thai corner takes cards nowadays.
    • The cases can be of use to people who still have a CD collection, as so many cases break on the hinges or the bit in the middle. Charity shops may also welcome a few to replace boxes on CDs they have received. But the chances of getting rid of a lot in one place are quite slim, other than the green bin. Maybe put the best ones out on a Saturday morning to see if anyone takes any?
    • That is sad. I didn't go much but it was interesting. The pizzas were really nice. Hopefully it's not just a chicken shop for the after school market. 
    • There's an 8 storey building about 200 yards NW of the site in question! It's so unremarkable that apparently many of the objectors don't even know it exists.   1) you're objecting to the economic analysis on the basis of "having a student"? That's hardly an evidence-based position. 2) 50-100 vehicles per day for move-in and move-out weekends, not every weekend, then?  3) It is a bit disappointing that you are disregarding the fairly obvious substantive difference between students enrolled in universities and pupils enrolled in local schools. Adults travel from all over England, the UK and the world to study at university in London. Parents of pupils at state schools try to send them to study as close to home as possible. Equally, you are ignoring that the student accommodation sector doesn't have enough capacity to house all students anyway. That is why many students live in share houses, whic increases competition with "regular" non-students who also want to rent those houses. Further, it's disappointing that you have decided students' accommodation needs are somehow not a valid consideration for you. They are also members of society - although perhaps they don't vote as much in local elections as houseowners do. Finally, you are again contradicting your own position that more student accommodation is unnecessary when you point out how expensive it is! That indicates an undersupply, and is a good reason to allow private companies to build more - it depresses the market price and makes it incrementally more accessible to lower income students.   Does it not strike you as odd that are simultaneously suggesting that only rich foreign students will live in the student accommodation BUT also that there aren't enough local students to fill it up and students don't have any money to spend in the local economy anyway?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...