Jump to content

Recommended Posts

fair point.

Let me rephrase that.

In order to view a docx you would require word 2010 with its lack of backward compatability and its useless and functionally opaque 'ribbon' thing.


Mind you there's nothing in that document that couldn't be presented in good old fashioned ascii in a txt file.

Microsoft Backward! yes! What a bunch of idiots. Really clever move making all your office product's files incompatible. And who are doing well? Apple - ok they have proprietary formats but at least there is cross product /release compatibility.

Microsoft make a lot of mistakes but then they have a HUGE suite of products.


I'm not a big fan of office 2010, but sometimes if you need to do a leap forward you might need to make a break with the past (though in this case I think they got it very wrong, part of their weird obsession with xml).


On the whole I'm ambivalent about them, they also get a lot, on balance, right (though with something like SQL Server it took them 20 years to get there).


But for all the Evilcorp mud that gets thrown at them, Jobs cut Apple's outreach programs and much oif their charitable activity, and Gates gave away 30 billion dollars, so credit where it's due.


And the only other thing I have to say is iTunes *shudders*

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...