Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Happy Friday, Forum!


Baby Lex (7mo) often comes out in a red rash when outside in the sunlight. The rash isn't raised and dissapears w/in 1-3 hours and doesn't bother Lex in the slightest. It it normally concentrated around her eyes, forehead and rOund the sides of her head around her ears. It happened when she was tIny and it was still warm/hot.


I'd take her to the GP with this vague description but fear there isn't much they could do without seeing it.


What gives, Forum?

Would say that if it doesn't bother her, & it goes of its own accord leaving nil obv damage then there's not a huge amount to worry about - presuming all sensible sun protection used as/of appropriate. Can't remember what it's called. It think some people can be a bit sensitive to the sun if haven't had reg exposure but the symptoms ease as it gets more sunny/skin gets use to it. Afraid the name of it is another thing to add to the list of things that becoming a mum has made me forget! :)

Redness in the skin is most likely to be the result of vascular activity. As far as I understand, redness in the skin is not related to melanin activity, although exposures resulting in increased vascular activity can also independently result in melanogenesis. Melanogenesis occurs is the epidermis following UV-induced DNA damage. Contrary to popular belief, redness does not develop into a tan. Sunburn does not develop into a tan either. These events are separate at the physiological level. Tan or sunburn can also each occur without any preceding redness, which is why sometimes you don't know your skin is sunburned until the burn itself develops some hours later.


If the rash doesn't persist, itch, or blister, I totally agree with buggie, don't worry about it. If it does persist or cause irritation, there are some very rare skin conditions such as polymorphous light eruption, solar urticaria, or light sensitive eczema for example, that might be to blame. I think you'd need to see a specialist dermatologist to diagnose this.


Could you take a few before and after pics of the rash? This way you'd have a photo record of whether it's better/worse/same over the summer, and also what it looks like to show your GP if needed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...