Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,


I?ve recently moved back to the area, and I?m now located towards the top of lordship lane by the plough.

Since we moved in, I?ve noticed that heavy traffic like busses and HGVs violently shake the house when they pass at a high speed, or at a regular speed going down the hill. There is a defect in the road which amplified the movement.


When I say shake, I mean, really shake, all of the furniture makes a noise, the house creeks, and it often wakes us up.


I?ve written to the council and have had some disappointing responses, unsurprisingly.

It?s affecting our sleep, well being and general happiness, and I really wish something could be done.

Most concerning of all is the fact that I have almost been knocked over out there by busses speeding past.


My question to you is, how do I have the council take this more seriously? Because currently I am getting nowhere with them, and aside from going to Tooley st and kicking off at them in person, I?m stuck for what to do.


Thanks


Ash

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/221269-traffic-shaking-the-gaff/
Share on other sites

Lordship Lane is a main road and a bus route.


I can't quite see how the council or anybody else could do anything about the traffic?


ETA: When you say there is a "defect" in the road, what do you mean? A bump?


ETA: And if you think buses are breaking the speed limit, you would probably need details of the specific buses, which wouldn't be very easy to get I imagine if you are inside your house.


Though probably worth asking TfL anyway just in case they can do something.

you could approach Community Speedwatch [email protected] and ask them to do speed checks. If you can get details of the buses then TfL take complaints about buses and are supposed to be moving towards over-riders to limit them to the speedlimit -- which would be 20mph at this point.
  • Like 1

We live on a double decker bus route and have experienced this in the recent past due to a pothole in the road. Once that pothole was fixed, it's gone back to normal, but one thing that did help was getting our windows looked at and getting the seal around the windows renewed (we have heavy, aluminium frame windows).


Once we stopped the windows from vibrating the travel through the rest of the house was much less for us (even though we couldn't particularly hear the windows moving, but that seemed to be the main vibration point for us).

The wetter the soil the more jelly like it becomes until ultimately with plenty of vibration you get liquefaction.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soil_liquefaction


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quick_clay


Of course you are unlikely to get these scenarios in Dulwich, but our clay has gone from very stiff and dry in the hot summer to this wetter softer stuff after all this rainfall. Are some feeling the slight difference in moisture content as increased vibration ?

Happens on ED Grove, council will not do anything about vibration from traffic speed bumps, but they might fix potholes. I had a lengthy discourse about 3 years ago with them. 4K of acoustic glass has helped the noise, but skips going over speed bumps sound like an explosion 💥
I had the same issue with vibrations from the speed bumps outside my house. The solution is some serious bracing of the floor joists and coupling them to the wall structure. Together with triple glazed acoustic glass windows, my front rooms are near silent and vibration free.

An update -

I'm in the midst of multiple email threads with the council and highways, they seem to be taking seriously at the moment, and have sent a surveyor to assess the road etc.


I believe there is an ongoing report to assess the need for traffic calming measures on lordship lane, as I believe there have been multiple complaints about the speeding vehicles. A car actually hit my car the other day which was stationary outside my home, but that's another matter entirely.


Thank you all for your input, and George for your insight Into the physics of the jelly soil, most intruiging.

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello everyone!


An update... I have received an email from Margy Newens, who has forwarded me a response from the highways department.

They highlighted that the particular issue was caused by a subsided part of the road left by a poorly replaced dig by a utility company.

They have assured me that the council will fix the multiple subsidence patches in the road within the next two weeks.


I'm delighted with the response, and very impressed with their attitude towards the matter, however, the proof is in the pudding, so we'll see.


Best, Ash

  • Like 1

Hi Ashley,


we're having a similar problem down the road between houses No. 248 and 256: several cross-sectional cracks causing vibration to the surrounding houses when HGVs and buses pass through. Same cause as well ? faulty communal pipe works undertaken a few years ago.


We have been dealing with the council since November 2018 as we wanted them to include our section of the road in their November resurfacing programme, and whilst they did not include it, they sent surveyors and promised to repair the road in early 2019. However, we haven't heard from them since February.


I wanted to ask whether the email you received from the highways department mentioned just the section of LL around Plough or also other sections? I just hope they will now repair ALL the damaged sections!


Many thanks,


JL

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Everyone,


An update for you, especially you JL;


I have been in ongoing conversations with Southwark, notably Margy Newens and the Highways department.

They were particularly helpful in rectifying the issue and although the damage to the road was left by a utility company, the council sorted it out. I must say, they were super helpful come the end, and I commend them for that.


The works to repair the road have now finished, they took place today this morning. The man that laid the cones out yesterday even mentioned that he'd laid our driveway some 15 years ago!


Anyway, a huge victory for the row of houses surrounding mine that suffer from the traffic on the road.


However, something still needs to be done about the speed at which the traffic is travelling in both directions, especially busses... I had to have a word with a bus driver the other day, as I was on his bus in the evening rush hour and we came down dog kennel hill at around 35mph, and proceeded to maintain that speed driving past the station and up grove vale. I have of course contacted both TFL and the council and have filed a complaint to the particular bus in question, but that doesn't stop the rest of them, sadly. I feel it's only a matter of time before there is some sort of accident involving speeding vehicles around the lordship area.


Thanks all!


Ash

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Granted Shoreditch is still London, but given that the council & organisers main argument for the festival is that it is a local event, for local people (to use your metaphor), there's surprisingly little to back this up. As Blah Blah informatively points out, this is now just a commercial venture with no local connection. Our park is regarded by them as an asset that they've paid to use & abuse. There's never been any details provided of where the attendees are from, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's never been any details provided of any increase in sales for local businesses, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's promises of "opportunities" for local people & traders to work at the festival, but, again, no figures to back this up. And lastly, the fee for the whole thing goes 100% to running the Events dept, and the dozens of free events that no-one seems able to identify, and, yes, you guessed it - no details provided for by the council. So again, no tangible benefit for the residents of the area.
    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...