Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've been here 9 years and never noticed until last month. Obviously I'm not very observant. :) It does seem strange that should be the case when the earliest the large planes can't land before 6am. It doesn't bother me in the slightest, clearly it was taken me 9 years to notice it, but I'm just curious.

Its mainly the SE Asian carriers. If they make good time, its hard to expect the planes to circle London for an hour or so.


There are certain allowances outside the curfew times ... Boeing has a good summary of the current allowances:


http://www.boeing.com/commercial/noise/heathrow.html

The airport is officially open 24 hours but there is a night ban on flights between 11pm and 4.30am - airlines must get (and pay a considerable amount of cash for) special dispensation to land between those hours... between 4.30am and 6.02am only a handful of flights are allowed to land and they invariably come in from the far east, some US destinations and some destinations in Africa. Flights not scheduled to land before 6.02, that arrive before that time, are not allowed to land and are stacked above London and surrounding areas until after 6.02 (most flights will take into account the flight time to allow them to arrive around their scheduled arrival time)... the noise is nothing new to the area... at 3pm everyday the runways at Heathrow are swapped to give residents on the flight path a break. This is why sometimes you'll hear the planes coming in and sometime you wont. Aircraft only approach over London to land and never take off and ascend over London.... hope this info helps..

Since November, Heathrow has been trialling a new system which allows them to move to dual use of runways when a plane is delayed by more than a 10-minute wait to land or take off and/or if 30% of all flights are delayed by more than 15 minutes. There was a diagram I saw which suggested this would increase the number of flights coming over south east London, and you don't necessarily got the few weeks on/few weeks off respite from early morning flights coming in to land. The trial finishes on 29 Feb and apparently complaints about noise from close to Heathrow have risen substantially:


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-17006619

Night flights operate 11pm-6am. Upto 30 a night around 10,000 a year out of Heathrows 580,000 flight allowance.

Apparently they're critical to the airlines, airport and supposedly UK economy.


I joined Heathrow Action Campaign Against Noise (HACAN) some time ago. Night flights cause hundres of thousands of Londoners impaired sleep. Crazy. If the noise troubles you join up with HACAN as well.


The night flght system is up for review this year. Hopefully they'll be banned and everyone can get a better nights sleep.

I worked at Heathrow for about 5 years in the 1990's and arrivals from the far east and Australasia always started arriving around 04:30 am. There were very few takeoffs between 10:40 pm (BA to Tel Aviv) and about 06:30 am apart from an occasional mail plane to Europe. Contrast the Heathrow terminals overnight - where you could almost hear a pin drop - to Gatwick which is busy almost around the clock with all night flights, especially in summer, taking off over a rural area. At least we in South London don't have low flying aircraft taking off over us,because they're many 1000's of feet up before they reach here.
Genuinely interested where you are going to avoid airplane noise.. Seems to me that if you have to live in london or the SE for work/family etc aircraft noise will always be a problem... Northern Scotland maybe? PS lots of advantages to that and not just decreased airplane noise...
it really isnt too bad around here compared to much of London, although sometimes it is intrusive. when the ash cloud closed heathrow for a few days a couple of years back you could really tell the differnce - the constant background hum is inescapable wherever you live in London. i'm just thankful i don't live in west london.
We moved recently (not because of the planes), close by to Herne Hill and it is noticably quiter in the mornings. Saying that, I think that the road that we lived on in ED was directly under a flight path and it drove me crazy when I had a young baby to look after.
We live on Goose Green and recently it has become unbearable - flights every morning from 5am onwards. God knows how we will sleep in the summer when we have the windows open. Earplugs don't seem to cut the noise out, so I'm not sure what other options are!
  • 2 weeks later...
James Barber - Beyond joining HACAN, can't the council take this up? Or London Assembly? I too am completely disturbed by the flight noise at 4:30 EVERY MORNING. My health hasn't been well, and I'm sure broken sleep has contributed to this. It seems very extreme to have to consider moving away, as it would uproot a whole family. And while its not new, I'm quite certain its gotten worse in the last couple of years.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Its crazy, they raise membership prices due to the refurb but things are worse than before.
    • That example seems fair enough - but wouldn’t say it’s completely analogous to the Trump situation the STORY (your caps) is about the bbc edit precisely because of what happened that day and people’s ability to brush it under the carpet. I think the edit didn’t  need to be done in that way to make the exact same point. So it’s wrong thing to do, but it isn’t actually incorrect in its point - and people should be reexamining the events and not the edit  and I don’t think it’s political to say or do this. If your supporter example played out that way then fair enough - I just cannot agree that in this case the edit fundamentally changes what he said, meant or did  - especially without events transpired   It could definitely be made more explicit but given what actually happened… ? At least hopefully at this point we are being less aggy with each other and trying to make our points 
    • But THE STORY is about a BBC edit, and its impartiality issues, not about the storming of the capital. And it's not the first time deceitful editing has been a story - there was the whole Queen scandal too.  I love the BBC and hate seeing the corporation frankly unable to remain impartial anymore. It breaks my heart, because we do have a higher standard in this country and that's what keeps us on the right side of history - not people like Trump.  A long time ago I made a film about a Trump supporter. I came into the edit one day and the editor and edited him to say something quite bigoted, which he simply never said. Luckily I spotted it. The editor's excuse was 'well it's the kind of thing he would say'. I made him take it out, because it was dishonest and you have to leave your politics at the door if you want to be a good documentarian. 
    • Showers are still cold today.  When I asked at Reception, I was told that one of the boilers was now repaired and they were just waiting for the water to warm up!  The pool was pretty cold today as well,  Still a load of grit /dirt on the bottom, seems to be getting worse.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...