Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Latin is part of a deep and broad education. But I have a question: the word "Engineering". From year 6 I couldn't find any other word that fit my son's strengths: maths and sciences. Everytime I have used this word as a "what will he study.." I have had educators and adults look blankly at me. The idea that "engineering" is "presigious" and oxbridge and really anything at all compared to doctor/ lawyer/ economics/ business has left me apologising and explaining ("he's all A's and A*'s like only a someone without other possibilities for a real subject would do engineering). Comments?

Engineering is a damn sight harder than medicine, law or economics. He'd need to be an A-star candidate to get through it.


Your problem is probably because engineers don't go into teaching or the careers advisory service.


Oxford wouldn't be right, Cambridge would be closer but still no banana. I'm guessing UMIST would be the right one, but somebody else probably knows better?

UMIST doesn't exist any more, it merged with Manchester Uni. Imperial is possibly the top place for science/tech/engineering in the UK. But engineering is a broad term, you should probably find out what area interests him... civil, mechanical, electronic/tech, aerospace, chemical, etc. The "educators" you've been talking to sound rather clueless, a BEng from a good university will be well respected.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I suspect that the schools that teach Latin far,

> far, far out perform those that don't, probably

> not casusal etc etc but just saying like


Purely down to money than teaching Latin. Schools that can teach Latin will have had more money to spend.

Have you met an engineer?

Everytime you go to a museum they have to look and read every single bloody thing. I spnet 4 hours in FLorence going round the Sceince museum. The only other peolpe there were a couple in their early 70's he was a retired engineer- and she like me was other half.

Does this sound familiar??

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I suspect that the schools that teach Latin

> far,

> > far, far out perform those that don't, probably

> > not casusal etc etc but just saying like

>

> Purely down to money than teaching Latin. Schools

> that can teach Latin will have had more money to

> spend.




So, schools that get a lot of money , presumably because people are willing to pay their fees based on the results they get(- as TBH it's largely Private schools with Latin now) do well acidemically but just teach Latin as a random act of 'hell we've got money let's teach Latin for the hell of it!'. My point UDT is that many of the best schools (in terms of results) do in fact teach Latin, so dismissing it as useless etc, as poeple were doing earlier perhaps misses a point. DUCY?

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> So, schools that get a lot of money , presumably

> because people are willing to pay their fees based

> on the results they get(- as TBH it's largely

> Private schools with Latin now) do well

> acidemically but just teach Latin as a random act

> of 'hell we've got money let's teach Latin for the

> hell of it!'. My point UDT is that many of the

> best schools (in terms of results) do in fact

> teach Latin, so dismissing it as useless etc, as

> poeple were doing earlier perhaps misses a point.

> DUCY?


I've merely asked a question on how useful Latin is in the real world. So to say that I've dismissed Latin or schools suddenly teach the subject as a result of a cash bonanza is wrong. The point I was making is money has a huge bearing on what subjects are offered to students. Private schools have more resources than state schools, hence why they perform better. Also private schools do not have the same social issues as states schools.

I think Latin is taught in some schools merely because there is a certain prestige attached with it. Especially in the more traditional/established schools. I would find it hard to justify the teaching of an extinct language, while the standard of maths and science in UK schools is so low.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> More evidence of failure at the basic level

>

> ...here

>

>

>

> Thanks a lot lowest common denominator educational

> idealism


I think the maths teacher shortage problem have always been factor in this country rather than educational idealism, Quids.


Why would a maths graduate want to work in the public sector for relatively low pay and with fringe benefits under attack by the Tories and media?

Plus - I'm absolutely in favour of good teachers and especially brilliant ones being paid for this at a true MARKET rate, their input is invaluable and they deserve far more money but good old all for one fits all lowest common denominator socialism has meant traditionally "its the same job, same rate, and no-one gets the sack for incompetence" for everyone.


I'd like more competition, more incentive and more reward for achievement and more crap teachers measured, asked to improve or thrown out, not 'moved aside or ignored' to the detriment of us all and their important profession as has been the traditional approach to poor teaching I believe. Unions hate that sort of thing.

Basic maths will do.


I'm talking generally, the Public Finaces being sooo fooked combined with a dumbing down of results to make it look like the massive 'investment' (nicer buildings, more computers, poorer basic literacy/ and arithmetic) under Labour had improved education, education, education is hardly Osbourne's fault.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think it's connected with the totem pole renovation celebrations They have passed now, but the notice has been there since then (at least that's when I first saw it - I passed it on the 484 and also took a photo!)
    • Labour was damned, no matter what it did, when it came to the budget. It loves go on about the black hole, but if Labour had had its way, we'd have been in lockdown for longer and the black hole would be even bigger.  Am I only the one who thinks it's time the NHS became revenue-generating? Not private, but charging small fees for GP appts, x-rays etc? People who don't turn up for GP and out-patient appointments should definitely be charged a cancellation fee. When I lived in Norway I got incredible medical treatment, including follow up appointments, drugs, x-rays, all for £200. I was more than happy to pay it and could afford to. For fairness, make it somehow means-tested.  I am sure there's a model in there somewhere that would be fair to everyone. It's time we stopped fetishising something that no longer works for patient or doctor.  As for major growth, it's a thing of the past, no matter where in the world you live, unless it's China. Or unless you want a Truss-style, totally de-regulated economy and love capitalism with a large C. 
    • If you read my post I expect a compromise with the raising of the cap on agricultural property so that far less 'ordinary' farmers do not get caught  Clarkson is simply a high profile land owner who is not in the business as a conventional farmer.  Here's a nice article that seems to explain things well  https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/nov24-farming-budget-inheritance-tax-apr/ It's too early to speculate on 2029.  I expect that most of us who were pleased that Labour got in were not expecting anything radical. Whilst floating the idea of hitting those looking to minimise inheritance tax, including gifting, like fuel duty they also chickened put. I'm surprised that anyone could start touting for the Tories after 14 years of financial mismanagement and general incompetence. Surly not.  A very low bar for Labour but they must be well aware that there doesn't need to be much of a swing form Reform to overturn Labour's artificially large majority.  But even with a generally rabid right wing press, now was the opportunity to be much braver.
    • And I worry this Labour government with all of it's own goals and the tax increases is playing into Farage's hands. With Trump winning in the US, his BFF Farage is likely to benefit from strained relations between the US administration and the UK one. As Alastair Campbell said on a recent episode of The Rest is Politics who would not have wanted to be a fly on the wall of the first call between Angela Rayner and JD Vance....those two really are oil and water. Scary, scary times right now and there seems to be a lack of leadership and political nous within the government at a time when we really need it - there aren't many in the cabinet who you think will play well on the global stage.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...