Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've still yet to see a breakdown, I imagine, as all ready speculated on, that the majority are countries attempting to repatriate their own citizens to face justice rather than give up our own citizens to face foreign justice.

How many of those are uk citizens to the US and vice versa? ...bueller?


And remember, they have five times our population and about 50 times our prison population so they probably have a great deal more people trying to flee justice.!

  • 2 months later...

Extradited Briton Christopher Tappin granted bail in US


Bail has been set at $1m (?620,000), of which $50,000 (?31,000) must be posted up front.



On March 5, Judge Robert Castaneda ruled that Tappin must remain in custody after prosecutors asked that he be detained for the duration of the proceedings because he "posed a flight risk". Assistant US attorney Greg McDonald told the court that "the risk is not that he'll punch somebody in the face, but through the use of a computer and the knowledge he has, he might pose a danger to the community." On March 8, Karen Todner (Tappin's solicitor in the UK) urged the British government to intervene over the bail refusal. Eventually, on April 25 2012, Tappin was granted bail on condition that he wore an electronic tracking tag at all times. Additionally, his ability to travel was restricted to within two Texas counties as well as the border city of El Paso for court appearances. (Emphasis added.)

-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Tappin

The problem with US law is that DAs or the DoJ use plea baragaining as leverage to get convictions, even of the innocent...there is much competition in US 'justice' and any prosecutor needs to get results. They have about an 80% conviction rate, weay, way above any other liberal democracy. They bring enpormous pressure on their victims and threats of a long/indefinite incarceration plus hugely costly trial (which I think under thir system you don't get money back if found innocent) or plead guilty and get a far reduced sentence. It's really only the megar rich that can afford to take this on, it's trade off of a few years vs 20+ and bankruptcy. I knew one of the Nat West Three and work in an industry (online gaming) where the pressure on individuals has led to plea baragians from people who really believe they were innocent against charges bought to them and advised they might have a good case BUT it's a massive gamble. Almost nothing to do with justice.

In proportion to the US, England probably convicts as many, if not more, innocents, in my experience.


The arcane ?sausage machine? that is the English Criminal Justice System is still rife with dishonesty and corruption.


We no longer hear about the scandals because since 1997 the CCRC has been blocking the referral of serious miscarriages of justice and wrongful convictions from being heard by the Court of Appeal in order to protect the sausage machine from being brought into disrepute and/or undermining public confidence in law and order.


The CCRC strikes again: Family killer Jeremy Bamber fails in appeal bid


The CCCR?s block has kept the fresh evidence away from public scrutiny and ensured that it can never again be raised as grounds for an Appeal.


What is the point of having a fresh evidence rule when the reviewing body can override it?


What is the point of having a Court of Appeal when the reviewing body can pre-empt its decision?

Oh well, it doesn't need a great deal of imagination to suggest that if there was a serious point to be made about the Natwest bunch, that a billion dollar fraudster such as Conrad Black wasn't the best guy to make it.


Regarding US justice, I don't think any of us need a moment of clarity to highlight its failings.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Tommy has been servicing our boiler for a number of years now and has also carried out repairs for us.  His service is brilliant; he’s reliable, really knowledgeable and a lovely guy.  Very highly recommended!
    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...