Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have lived in East Dulwich for over 30 years, and in that time the quality of life has improved dramatically. Lordship Lane when I came here was, frankly, shabby, with few decent or interesting restaurants and shops, indeed a plethora of shops selling second hand prams is lodged in my mind (of course, even then, there were gems, and I particularly regret the loss of a decent haberdashers). In that time also public transport has improved (the Orange line, new bus routes).


This has been marked by the steepest rise (from a low base) in house prices in London, as more people recognised the pleasures and benefits of living in East Dulwich, with its increasingly vibrant high street, and street market, parks and good (or reparable) housing stock offering quite a good mix of housing types. However in the last couple of years Southwark Council and TfL have been working to reduce that life quality. Reductions in bus frequencies (and routes) and the war against private vehicles are symptomatic of a series of attacks from Tooley St and County Hall which mark a complete disdain for those of us in the south of the borough.


Decisions are being made ?against? us by people who probably never even come down South (well, no tubes, so no real access). Our councillors are now part of the apparat, keeping their new-boy noses clean as deselection comes into view. The creation of the super-borough of Southwark and the loss of the Borough of Camberwell looks increasingly a poor decision as regards those of us who would have been in that lost borough. At least the money being grabbed from us who are motorists might have been spent on our transport needs, rather than dissipated in the north. But Southwark has no requirement to spend our car blood money on us in the south.


If we are to ?take back control? I know where I?d start. And it?s not on the UK?s borders.

The only opposition was James Barber, but the "good" people (and I use that lightly) of Southwark decided he was to be replaced so now with no opposition the council can and do as they please. So until this shower are either voted out of office or there is a decent opposition, I'm afraid I can only see it getting worse much the same as it is the other side of Langton Rise in Lewisham who also run a one party state.
I agree that we are poorly served by public transport. The only thing to do is to lobby our local MP and GLA representatives with examples of what has got worse. In the meantime, to avoid frustration as much as possible, we just have to get up earlier/walk more/be more cooperative on the buses and trains we do have (yes, that means you, Mr Don't Want To Walk Up The Stairs/Down The Train and Mrs I Like To Hug The Exit and Ms My Bag Needs A Seat More Than Any Paying Passenger).

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree that we are poorly served by public

> transport. The only thing to do is to lobby our

> local MP and GLA representatives with examples of

> what has got worse. In the meantime, to avoid

> frustration as much as possible, we just have to

> get up earlier/walk more/be more cooperative on

> the buses and trains we do have (yes, that means

> you, Mr Don't Want To Walk Up The Stairs/Down The

> Train and Mrs I Like To Hug The Exit and Ms My Bag

> Needs A Seat More Than Any Paying Passenger).



Agree..It amazes me when I get on a crowded morning train and see some idiot with their bag sat on a seat.

And its just plain daft the way people refuse to budge to let one get off the train at the canada water interchange, all it would take is one small side step but no..you have to literally push past them to get off.

I could go on and on about how frustrated I am that our bus services seem to be cut and for those like myself who work in the west end we are very much at the mercy of the overground with its pathetic Canada water interchange,

We live in an architecturally lovely, generally peaceful, very rich area of one of the world's greatest cities with wonderful parks, fabulous restaurants and shops and other amenities within walking distance. We have three train stations in easy reach from whence one can reach central London in less than a quarter of an hour. We have a multiplicity of bus services.


Private car use is ruining London, making it ugly through the congestion, noise and the aggression and misery it causes and literally killing Londoners from pollution.


I'm as up for a moan as the next man, but by God, we are luckier and more privileged than a good 95% of the rest of the population on this earth. A little perspective, please.


How did our forebears manage, even in our grandparents' generation (for me that's those who were in their twenties in the 1930s and 40s) when private cars were the privilege of the very wealthy? They walked, cycled, took buses and trains, and as far as I can ascertain were far less miserable and whingy about things than we are today.

This applies to a lot of London. It's becoming an awful place to live. TFL and the boroughs just see us as cash machines. Just wait till the ULEZ extension. Crime is rising, with police stations closed, robbery and even murders especially with knives getting much worse.


London will depopulate massively again like it did for long periods of the 20th century. It's going to get worse before it gets better.

mrwb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This applies to a lot of London. It's becoming an

> awful place to live. TFL and the boroughs just see

> us as cash machines. Just wait till the ULEZ

> extension. Crime is rising, with police stations

> closed, robbery and even murders especially with

> knives getting much worse.


The homicide rate in London for 2018 at 132 was lower than it was for every single year between 1990 and 2008. Not saying everything in the garden's rosy, but I would say don't be hysterical about saying everything's getting worse.

?London will depopulate massively again like it did for long periods of the 20th century.?


A major reason London?s population fell in the 20th century was the damage inflicted by the Luftwaffe. I don?t know the numbers but many, many homes were destroyed and those made homeless were accommodated outside London. When the war ended, clearance of war damage was combined with slum clearance and more Londoners were moved out, some returned, very many didn?t and put down roots in new areas. Then there was the creation of new towns which again many Londoners moved to.


The original post on this thread does appear to be an anti-Labour diatribe rather than an unbiassed examination of the quality of life of those who live in East Dulwich, based primarily on potential restrictions for the car owner. Public transport has improved enormously since I first moved here when there were far fewer buses and there were no trains on a Sunday from East Dulwich station. Now we have the Jubilee line which has opened up connections from London Bridge and the London Overground is easily accessible. If journey times by bus are slower then a large contributory factor has to be the massive increase in private cars on the roads which are just not wide enough to accommodate all vehicles. So something?s got to give. There are of course those for whom owning and driving a car is essential. If non essential car journeys were curtailed, it would improve the quality of life for that group of car owners. (RH despite your assumptions, I have never owned a car and never got the hang of learning how to drive.)


I guess it comes down to whether you?re a glass half full or a glass half empty person: I would count myself in the former group.

mrwb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This applies to a lot of London. It's becoming an

> awful place to live. TFL and the boroughs just see

> us as cash machines. Just wait till the ULEZ

> extension. Crime is rising, with police stations

> closed, robbery and even murders especially with

> knives getting much worse.

>

> London will depopulate massively again like it did

> for long periods of the 20th century. It's going

> to get worse before it gets better.


It'll go the way of gated segregated communities is my guess.

Many of those needing housing are being sent to places like Thanet or Luton completely away from their support system, families and friends. As I write, the topic below this one was "Woman Looking In Bins". I guess her quality of life may not be too good. I am one of the lucky ones, own my home and love it and my support system for health needs are local and all in place. But it takes just one thing to go wrong in many people's lives to drastically affect it. Look at all the TSA agents and park rangers and all those who were not paid when Trump had a hissyfit. People can not afford to save much there, and many have been ruined. My own quality of life is enhanced massively by being a motorcyclist. Can't explain that but it is. All we can do is be together and try and be kind and non judgemental. Someone speaking to a homeless person in a kind manner can affect that person all day if they have no-one else. I read once of a woman who had few friends or the ability to make them, and who did not mind going to the dentist when she could or the opticians because in her whole way of her lonely life, those people were the only ones who actually touched her body. Can you imagine? We can't know what is going on in others' lives but we are educated and have the ability to think things through and try and make a difference. Everyone's quality of life can be even slightly enhanced just by smiling at someone and saying hello. Example, I saw a young black male a few months ago with a staffie that looked in a right state. Clearly it had been in a fight. I made a judgement that that guy was not responsible because of the body language of the dog. So I spoke to him and asked how his dog was. He said he had taken it from someone who he knew abused the dog. And he hated the judgement everyone else made, the looks, the attitude, because they assumed he was the culprit, but was so pleased I didn't do that. His dog clearly loved him and he loved his dog and they each improved one another's quality of life. OK essay over.

seenbeen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Says it all when you can't trust the Royal Mail

> now

> https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?

> 5,2012380



There have always been thefts by some people working for Royal Mail.


That's why, to the best of my knowledge, Royal Mail have always had an investigation department.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...