Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's a shock of an admission but for the first time in many, many years, I ventured out to Lordship Lane over the weekend. To date myself, the last time I visited LL was when it was full of antique shops. Anyone else even remember that decade so very long ago?


Having read so much about it, I was sorely disappointed. Yes there are some nice shops, agreed. But let's be frank, it looks very much like Walworth High Street. Actually, architecturally, Walworth High Street is superior. And with its recent makeover and new paving/planting, superior in all ways save the quality of the shops.


The pavement is dirty and dis-jointed and my favourite pastime of looking above the shops at the architecture met with great disappointment. The Christmas decorations look like something you'd see in an American film set in a depressed mining town circa 1976.


I enjoyed a lovely meal and popped in to a few places and yes, the quality of shopping is high. It made me more depressed about Camberwell, which underneath beats Lordship Lane hands down. The architecture is so much better (yes, much of it beneath betting shops and off licence cladding) and the layout: a lovely village green with the parish church spiralling in the distance...and the housing stock heading south and, to a degree, west and slightly north. All of it so much closer to London. It really depresses one.


I guess it comes down to what I've always known. Camberwell, despite having a superior canvass underneath, is overwhelmed by a poorer population and more than its fair share of high density council housing. That's it in a nutshell.


Such a shame. Such a disappointment. With so much private investment there, surely you can get your share of what Walworth and Bellendon received from the public purse. It's those places in reverse: they take a 'if we build it they will come (and they really haven't)' versus you all - they've come and you've still to build it.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2192-my-first-visit-to-ll-in-decades/
Share on other sites

You know, Maurice, I agree with some of what you say. I think that we spend too much of our time thinking about content (ie shops, restaurants, cafes) and not enough about form (architecture, roads, trees, street furniture etc). LL is a bit grubby, really, in parts. The flats above the shops are not always pretty, paving stones are sometimes broken, there's a lack of greenery, especially from Budgens down to Goose Green, which is the most used section. Further up, the houses past the (horrid) police station, some of which are divided into flats, are past their prime. Interested to know whether others agree with this reality check? Nero

His usual gripes about investment etc aside, Maurice (and Nero's follow-up) are pretty on the money with regard to LL's appearance


I think it was Keef some months back who raised the point initially - ED generally can't hold an architectural candle to many surrounding areas. But that's as much to do with history as anything else and the question would be - "given where we are what can we do about it if anything"


As an example, many people find the flast above the Budgens-Co-Op block pretty grim visually but as a resident of one of them came on to point out - those are people's homes, much loved and would put up a hell of a fight should anyone try and "change" them


Now I think the building is rank and would love to change it but


a) the resident has a more impressive and important point than me

b) modern architecture ain't so great anyway


So yes I wish the form was much better, but the content is stil the winner for me - I'm not moving anywhere

I mean no ill will, just my observations. I find it fascinating, actually. I, too, prefer it to Walworth and even Bellendon. But isn't it funny how putting a beautiful coat of paint on something at the public's expense does very little unless the private sector decides to step up?


I just think given the enormous tax base generated by LL, you all should push to the front of the queue to get your coat of paint.

I don't really look up above the shops too often, so am not bothered by it, and I'm sure they're all lovely inside, but I still think the buildings look fugly. I do however agree that Bromley is a shocking place!

(can't see your photo as my work block flickr, much to my annoyance!)


At the end of the day though it makes no odds. Sydenham High Street has lovely buildings, but it's still nowhere near as nice. It does have a few absolute treasures though like the little iranian shop that sells some amazing breads and little sweet things. It will be interesting to watch it change, as I'm sure it will.


There are a lot of "middle class" people who are happy to see the arrival of The Dolphin in it's new form. Personally I think it's a souless and awful place but there you go. There are also lots of pubs filled with "working classes" and old men, and I wonder what will happen to these pubs and these people, and whether there will be the same bitterness about the area being "up and coming"...


Here is a link to a thread you may find interesting on the Sydenham Forum, in which there is a bit of East Dulwich envy.

The problem with placing too much emphasis on architectural merit is that if you're not too careful, you'll end-up living on Camberwell Grove (in an area full of people you despise), posting furiously on the website forum of an 'architecturally inferior' neighbouring area (full of people you seem to want to talk to).
my friend Angela used to live on Camberwell Grove. She was burgled three times in six months and her car was broken into almost weekly :( I lived in Camberwell for a couple of years and loved it, but there is no way i'd move back there now seeing as how, unfortunately, it's a complete, unsalvagable dump. be lovely if it wasn't, but it just is.

Maurice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Or you could end up quite *angry*.


? ? ?


I'm a calm and content chap, Mozza. Happy in the knowledge that, in life, people are generally more interesting than buildings. Give it a go! You might like it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Library of things is coming to Dulwich. It’ll be at Dulwich Leisure Centre.  https://www.instagram.com/reel/DHGIluhiqSo/?igsh=MXNnZHpmZml2cG1sYg==   Link to website: Link Library Of Things
    • Trump suffers from opening his mouth before putting his brain in gear. Needs to take a lesson in statesmanship from Carney, slow well thought out responses to media questions. How about Carney for President of the US as well. That should upset some and more.
    • As every day goes by, it looks increasingly likely that Trump is going to sell Ukraine down the river. It's a re-run of Chamberlain and Hitler over Czechoslovakia. Trump talks of re-allocating "assets" which means conceding assets of Ukraine to Putin  and of putting in peace-keeping forces into Ukraine  to "guarantee" security. History tells us that peace-keeping forces are ineffective. Remember Bosnia & Hertzogovinia in 1996. Remember the peace keepers on the Golan Heights. They disappeared without firing a shot when Serbia and Israel took military action. It will be the same in Ukraine. Give it five years (or less) and Russia will extend its land grab.  Sadly, history repeats itself because the appeasers fail to grasp the realities. Just pray that The Donald becomes the fifth before too long.  
    • Niko completed a third job for me now. A leaking tap that was oozing from everywhere. I called Niko in the morning, showed him a recording of the problem,  and he was over with a new tap, fitted within the hour. Job done, perfect! I know I can always rely on Niko. He is my go to plumber.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...