Jump to content

Recommended Posts

jimlad48 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would look for a mandatory cycling test, in same

> way as driving test is mandatory - and L plates

> too for those that have yet to pass it.


The driving test is mandatory because cars are extremely dangerous, frequently lethal, machines if not handled responsibly and with a modicum of expertise (not that one would think that's required, from empirical observation). Bicycles do not, except in exceptionally rare and tragic incidents, pose anything like the same danger. A bicycle is extremely simple to ride and so doesn't require an ability assessment in the same way car driving does (I don't deny some people ride bicycles irresponsibly or even illegally, but few ride them badly - bloody hell, even I'm quite good at it). You might say that having to pass a test would make cyclists more aware of the rules of the road; please go out and stand by any busy road around here and watch the behaviour of car drivers, all of whom have passed a driving test, and come back and tell me that passing a test is in any way a guarantor of sensible behaviour on the roads. The substantial majority of cyclists (85%) already have driving licences anyway, so have undergone tests of the same requirements of theory and awareness.


> I would also look for mandatory cyclist

> registration number on bikes to enable easy

> identification of cyclists who break the Highway

> code. I think this may make the attitudes more

> accountable.


Where are you going to put registration plates large enough to be seen on a bicycle? That's just silly.


>

> Said as someone who within the last week has been

> threatened with a beating up by a cyclist for

> politely asking them to ride on the road, not the

> pavement.


I was threatened with being beaten up two weeks ago on Rye Lane because I politely suggested to someone that they could put their MacDonald's carton in the bin rather than throwing it into the gutter. Should we have compulsory registration for pedestrians, or fast food consumers? Twats is twats, walking, on bikes, in cars...but somehow many people seem to think it's OK to hold cyclists to a higher standard of accountability than any other section of the community.


Fortunately however much you and the rest of the cycle-hating brigade demand it, it's never going to happen. Go and look at the numbers of people KSI by car drivers as opposed to cyclists, then have a look at the numbers of people killed by pollution-related diseases, and have a think about whether a silly campaign to put numberplates on bicycles is really the most important issue related to road use in this country right now.

exdulwicher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Remember this one:

> https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshi

> re-40134629

>

> Pretty clear cut case of driving without due care

> & attention (maybe even dangerous driving),

> injuries caused - no prosecution. "Just an

> accident". Oopsy.


How about driving with three defective tyres, skidding on black ice and killing four cyclists, ?160 fine and six points on his licence: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/5241798.stm


I've long said that if you want to murder someone in this country, don't bother hatching an intricate plot, just wait until they're on a bicycle and then hit them with a car, it'll cost you a week's wages at most.

Well I?d be quite happy to see a large increase in penalties for drivers and cyclists. Dangerous and selfish behaviour is becoming far to commonplace among both groups.


rendelharris Wrote

> You'd be surprised how few traffic lights do have

> them; according to t'internet, the only junctions

> with red light cameras anywhere near this

> neighbourhood are the Village Way/ED Grove

> junctions and the Champion/DK Hill junction. The

> little cameras on top of traffic lights are just

> for traffic management, not enforcement - red

> light cameras require a complex setup of

> below-tarmac sensors and so are costly and

> troublesome to set up, which explains their

> rarity.

Here's a radical suggestion, rather than witter on about dangerous cyclists, and micro-chipping them and their bikes, go and get some cycle training. This is aimed both at cyclists and dare I say professional drivers. Would be good to hear from some of the latter who have done this. https://www.cycleconfident.com/sponsors/southwark/

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Here's a radical suggestion, rather than witter on

> about dangerous cyclists, and micro-chipping them

> and their bikes, go and get some cycle training.

> This is aimed both at cyclists and dare I say

> professional drivers. Would be good to hear from

> some of the latter who have done this.

> https://www.cycleconfident.com/sponsors/southwark/


Mrs H did it when she got back into cycling after twenty years (and ten years of me nagging) and it did wonders for her; it turned her from someone who would only ride offroad or on cyclepaths to someone who now happily cycles right round the Place de la Bastille (and if you can ride round there you can ride anywhere). It also, not coincidentally, has made her a brilliantly considerate driver around cyclists.

I agree, Cycle Confident training courses are brilliant and free. I say that as someone who was very reluctant to take up cycling in London to begin with. I'm very glad I did. If only there were also bike maintenance courses on offer that would be great (anyone knows of any in the local area?).


I felt that, without any further qualification, the statement of the OP was unnecessarily provocative and rightly deserved the response that it received. A bit more understanding and less animosity from both cyclists and motorists would go a long way.

zerkalo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree, Cycle Confident training courses are

> brilliant and free. I say that as someone who was

> very reluctant to take up cycling in London to

> begin with. I'm very glad I did. If only there

> were also bike maintenance courses on offer that

> would be great (anyone knows of any in the local

> area?).


Cycle Confident do courses but not in Southwark. However they do them in Lambeth and Westminster and you can go (?18) if you work in those boroughs. Alternatively Evans Cycles do a one-hour course for ?15, think it's on a couple of Wednesdays a month - book online or ask in store.

Yep, as mentioned Evans Cycles run "Fix It" classes:

https://www.evanscycles.com/help/servicing/bike-maintenance-classes


There's a branch on East Dulwich Road as you head towards Peckham from Goose Green.


Brixton Cycles certainly used to do them, don't know if they still do.

Up in town, Look Mum No Hands on Old Street run regular bike maintenance classes.


And if you want to venture even further north of the river (!) there's this place:

https://lbk.org.uk/ which gets good reports.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...