Jump to content

Recommended Posts

dbboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The child is the result of this teenage jihadi

> getting pregnant by another Dutch jihadi, and

> where is the father?

> So why do you want her child in this country

> brought up by the grand father who radicalised his

> own daughter. And the father will not ignore his

> baby, he'll want to come here from Holland to see

> her and her baby. Why put this country at further

> risk? Solution, why doesn't the family go and join

> her in Syria? Result, Today's child is tomorrow?s

> terrorist

Agreed...most babies born into fundamentalist religious families are indoctrinated from day 1 and the laws of this country and the UK protect that in the name of FREEDOM. The only freedom here is the freedom of the terrorist to kill and maim

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Agreed...most babies born into fundamentalist

> religious families are indoctrinated from day 1

> and the laws of this country and the UK protect

> that in the name of FREEDOM. The only freedom here

> is the freedom of the terrorist to kill and maim


I'm more concerned about Islamaphobic racist antisemitic bigots who celebrate when someone of differing opinions to themselves dies young of cancer being allowed to teach our children.

RH - at what point will you cease labelling UG with those spiteful attacks ?

Do you need him to acknowledge guilt for all/some of them, or even then would you still persist ?

I can't speak for the rest of the forum, but personally I am aware (have seen) several times you use the same attacks, again and again. Is this to be an indefinite behaviour going forward ?

I expect UG (and the entire forum) has GOT the message so why not wind it in, unless you have something additional (a new attack, perhaps ?) to stab him with.

Please don't pull the "I'm standing-up for freedom" BS. All the things you accuse UG of are illegal, so if you're so convinced just call the police and make your case, you seem convinced, so convince them.

Just quit the vile (are there any viler ?) attacks.


Back to the subject, I think a line has to be drawn, someone left the country to join the fight with ISIS.

Whether she picked-up a gun, learned how to make bombs, or agreed to take the fight to the UK, we'll never know I expect. We do know she thought it a worthy cause and went to support an outfit that would happily kill in the UK (amogst other places) if possible.

I'd prefer a precedence be set that no-one, man or woman, returns to UK from such a foray. I hope this would

If that's not possible due to law and rights, that's a shame and will be to the detriment of the UK's safety IMO.

These are extreme times and unfortunately, against my usual view, extreme measures need adopting. We can speculate all day about her / anyone's intentions, but if she never returns she'll not partipate in / support terrorism from within the UK. And hopefully neither would anyone else else finding they can't return.

Like I said, it may not be achievable due to UK hands being tied.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> RH - at what point will you cease labelling UG

> with those spiteful attacks ?

> Do you need him to acknowledge guilt for all/some

> of them, or even then would you still persist ?

> I can't speak for the rest of the forum, but

> personally I am aware (have seen) several times

> you use the same attacks, again and again. Is this

> to be an indefinite behaviour going forward ?

> I expect UG (and the entire forum) has GOT the

> message so why not wind it in, unless you have

> something additional (a new attack, perhaps ?) to

> stab him with.

> Please don't pull the "I'm standing-up for

> freedom" BS. All the things you accuse UG of are

> illegal, so if you're so convinced just call the

> police and make your case, you seem convinced, so

> convince them.

> Just quit the vile (are there any viler ?)

> attacks.


I'll stop attacking him when he stops being a vile antisemitic racist Islamaphobic bigot. When he makes posts that don't display any of those traits, I don't attack him. When he does (as he did in his post above), I'm going to point it out, every single time. If you or anyone else doesn't like it, feel free to report it to Admin and they can delete as they feel necessary.


Interesting that you seem to think attacking someone for their foul bigotry is "viler" than displaying foul bigotry in the first place. Says a lot about your value system.


I would love the idea of the boys in blue having a word with UG for his foul comments, and they most certainly do transgress a number of laws, but as it's barely possible to get them to attend a house burglary I somehow doubt they'd be interested in what is said on the EDF. So as long as he persists with his foulness, I'll persist in opposing it. Thank you.

Those beliefs are a 'group think' I see all over twitter at the moment - and recently once or twice in 'real' life. I now just block (although sometimes with a snide remark first).


At least Tommy Robinson now banned from Facebook and when he moaned about that on Instagram he got banned from there too (mid sentence apparently LOL)


https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/feb/26/tommy-robinson-banned-from-facebook-and-instagram

Not before time. In the past two weeks he has used fb to bait his followers to troll a rape crisis center, because of all the services they offer, they produced one leaflet aimed at helping BAME women come forward, for distribution within the BAME community. And he baited his followers to abuse a personal trainer because she offers a class to muslim women. He is a racist hypocrite and rabble rouser, and it is only a matter of time before he baits someone to go further than verbal abuse.

I've enjoyed this debate, and as often I am interested in informed views whether I agree or not. It's bound to lurch one way or the other, but has not got too rabid.


Now time to interject. People make silly mistakes. They get misled by their peers. They may be particularly vulnerable to this.


But to draw a comparison with WW2. "She's gone out to fight for an evil entity and deserves everything she gets....". Many of the German population were in the same situation during and after the second world war in supporting their regime. And you could argue that there were certain aspects of what the allied armies did, such as fire storms in German cities and dropping nuclear bombs that a modern society would consider as war crimes, that no doubt had popular support then and now.


I'm with the let the law of the land decide on the appropriate treatment if and when she returns.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Pereira Neves "Cuppa with a Coppa" is a misrepresentation as PCSOs are not real police.   They have no more powers of arrest that any public citizen. They may have the "authority" to advise the regular police of a crime - just like Joe Public. One exception is that they can issue fixed penalty notices to people who cycle on a footpath. We see people cycling on the footpath every day but have never seen a PCSO issue a fixed penalty notice to anybody. No  qualifications are needed to become a PCSO.  At best, all they do is reassure and advise the public with platitudes.      
    • Right.  Already too many people saying “labour pushed for longer and more stringent lockdowns” which if nothing else, does seem to give credence the notion that yes people can be brainwashed    Nothing ...  Nothing Labour pushed for was about longer lockdowns.  Explicitly, and very clearly they said “lock down early OR we will be locking down for longer “   ie they were trying to prevent the longer lockdowns we had   But “positive thinking” and “nothing to see here” from Johnson led to bigger problems    as for the hand-wavery about the economic inheritance and markets being spooked by labour budget - look - things did get really really and under last government and they tried to hide it.  So when someone tries to address it, no one is going to be happy.  But pretending all was tickety boo is a child’s response 
    • What would you have done differently, Rockets? I cannot, for the life of me, think of a financial strategy that would have satisfied 'working people' and businesses and driven growth and reduced the deficit. But I'm no economist. On another note, since we're bashing Labour, one thing that really got my goat was Labour's reaction to  Kemi Badenoch being elected leader of the opposition. When our own dear Ellie Reeves was asked for her reaction to KB's election, the first thing she said was "I'm proud that she's the first black woman to lead a political party, but..." Congratulating someone for being black (she's Nigerian FFS, not 'black') and female is such an insult. You'd be forgiven for thinking that that's all Labour sees... and it completely detracts from her achievements as a politician. It's almost as if they were implying that she'd done well in spite of her race and sex. If that's not racist... I think Kemi is an absolute nut job. People in her own party have said she'd start a brawl in an empty room and would cross the street to bite your ankle. But that kind of makes me like her. And if anyone can hold Labour's feet to the fire, she can.  (Ex labour party member here, who voted Keir for leader of the party, BTW, in case anyone wants to start a pile-on and call me a Tory lover). 
    • Their comms has been diabolical. The "son of a toolmaker" and "working people" soundbites may have placated an electorate before an election but they will come back to haunt you after it and will bite you hard if things don't go well.  If they don't improve things soon it is going to be a long parliament for them and there are no signs things are getting better. Amazing as they had 14 years to prepare for this but being in opposition is far, far easier than running a country.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...