Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Anyhoo, let us once again to Star Trek. The split infinite never bothered me too much. I just assumed they forgot to put the commas in. What bothers me is the concept of, ?Space - the final frontier.?


A frontier is the area where your stuff ends and another bit of stuff starts. You can always push further into the other stuff (as long as the UN doesn?t stop you) and then you will have another frontier. So a frontier isn?t final unless nothing exists on the other side of it.


Now this is possibly true of space, if you mean the sort of existence-balloon of space-time that houses our reality. Perhaps nothing exists outside of this but perhaps something does and we just aren?t able to perceive it.


Which is all very well but it is as much a final frontier to someone sitting in a barrel of pilchards in 18th century Ipswich as it is to people in matching pyjamas in a spaceship in the far-flung future.


Trouble is I don?t think that is what they meant at all. I think they were talking about the places outside of the earth?s atmosphere that you have to wear pyjamas and ride a spaceship to visit. Like Saturn and Hollywood. There may be new frontiers out there but final ones?


Well maybe if you suddenly come up against the end of space like a big wall. But that doesn?t exist apparently. It?s all supposed to sort of fold in on itself.


Isn?t it?


Or have the men in white coats and old jumpers changed their minds again?

Today's Evening Standard have picked up our baton.


The hitherto unbeknownst-to-me-but-now-love-of-my-imaginary-life Rosamund Urwin criticises both prospective mayoral candidate Ken Livingstone for:


"Watch out! There's less police about"


in a campaign poster - all those with O-Level English will know that "police" is a count noun and should therefore should be prefixed with "fewer" (I recently read that a supermarket has changed it's aisle posters but can't remember which one) - and she also knocks Prime Minister David Cameron for insisting:


"...on saying 'try and' whenever he speaks. An Eton education apparently isn't enough to impart the information that this sense of 'try' is followed by an infinitive."


She also admits to being a "young fogey" and reading Simon Heffer's Strictly English on holiday. I think I might be in love.

reading her biog I pity your alter ego and his misguided crush


"Rosamund is a reporter on the City desk with a fashion obsession. It has regularly been noted that this combination makes her a real-life Rebecca Bloomwood from Confessions of a Shopaholic, although she hopes with more financial savvy and better taste in clothes."


Especially given the fallaciousness "taht[sic] this sense of 'try' is followed by an infinitive."


Standards of journalism these days eh! *she is rather pretty though I'll grant you*

Hugo,

H said

------------------------------

People get confused about dyslexia (unwitting pun) - it's not about spelling problems, and those spelling problems which are created are usually quite specific, not general grammatical rules.


True dyslexia is much broader than simply confusing or transposing letters, for example mistaking ?b? and ?d.".


In general, symptoms of DRD may include:


- Difficulty determining the meaning (idea content) of a simple sentence


- Difficulty learning to recognize written words


- Difficulty rhyming


What's your source for that info? I'd always thought,perhaps erroneously, that dyslexia was an umbrella term that covered a range of things, and that most involve problems with memory processing. In this way problems with category, especially that sound the same- two/too/to- might arise as a result of dyselxia.

I've no doubt that they could first mate. My point was more that these would be part of a significant portfolio of problems.


Not being able or willing to spell correctly is not the definition of dyslexia. Having worked so closely with someone who genuinely suffered from dyslexia I generously get offended on his behalf when idle ingrates claim that they're dyslexic as a get out of jail free card.


That definition of dyslexia was from one of the big medical associations, but I forget which.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
    • This link mau already have been posted but if not olease aign & share this petition - https://www.change.org/p/stop-the-closure-of-east-dulwich-post-office
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...