Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Three weeks to go to the new Argos but Sainsburys ED don't seem to have enough staff to cope with the self checkouts on a normal day to day basis anyway.


Was there last Tuesday afternoon and one of the self checkouts walked out without paying for ?55 worth of stuff!

That is happening alot, many times I have gone to use the self service till and someone s whole shopping has been scanned but not paid for.


There is also a careless worker who has a big mouth and when you need his help on the self service till he always leaves the till on the staff mode. Meaning that when he walks away you could wipe out most of your shopping and he would be none the wiser.


Sainsburys staff in Dulwich are mostly rude and unhelpful.

I stick by my decision to rarely if ever use this Sainsbury?s unless absolutely necessary. They charge far more than Morrisons, Tesco, Asda and Lidl (all within walking distance), for the same products!


I may go in more often to use the Argos store now though. That?s one positive.


Louisa.

They all have their good and bad points.


I don't trust the self checkouts in Morrisons as have had a number of discrepancies with the change dispensed, and currently a pain to get to due to the long term rye lane road works.


Tesco are OK but a bit of a trek to the OKR, but again long queues at both standard and self service checkouts, with often not enough open. Aldi and Lidl are great for certain items not available elsewhere or for some of their own brand goods. Items such as dried herbs, spices, jams, tinned fruit, some of their specials and when they have themed weeks. I find for certain items they are better value than the big 4. However have noticed recently even their prices have risen. Sainsbury's are a bit more expensive on certain items but certainly fresher goods and all round provide a better choice, but I have noticed their prices increasing on certain things.


Ultimately it's down to personal choice, my preference is different items from different stores.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I went to France recently and in the city I visited there were large billboards on the main streets urging people to stop their dogs from messing on the streets and in a little park a sign said something to the effect that this park was built for your enjoyment not as a dumping ground for dog mess. There were also big signs about not fly tipping. I wonder if councils are too worried about offending dog owners by making a fuss about this major problem. I was a dog owner for many years, got free bags from the council and there were even bins around then.
    • I was also woken by this. It happened in two bursts, which felt even more anti social.
    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...