Jump to content

23rd March - ?Put It To The People March? - central London


Recommended Posts

If nothing else - it should highlight the fact that this government has let the completely failed in meeting its obligations to the people.


We have reduced investment in education, police, NHS; a benefits system run by a company (who have a mission to make profit), fmailies who cannot survive without food banks, huge house prices due to the ease at which foreign investors can buy up stock - people who cannot afford to buy/ rent/ live, job cuts....


It goes on.


TM is one part of this failure. The rest of the government should hang their heads in total shame.


This is one final opportunity for them to turn this around.


The People's March should be looking at more fundamental changes than to get a A50 cancellation. That's really, really nto going to happen. The focus should be on rebuilding the pillars of this country - and starting with an overhaul of what this government are doing with it.

And your view Mr/Ms/BTQ Teddy? Pray tell, I'd be most interested. How do you think this will all pan out? Are you throbbing hard, flaccid soft, or simply impotent (that the original definition - unable to take effective action; helpless or powerless.

zerkalo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So good to be part of this demo today. Check this

> footage out. Estimated 1m people took part.

> Incredible!

>

>


> 05714945/video/1



Actually it has been estimated that between 312,000 and 400,000 were there - not 1 million

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> robbin Wrote:

>

> >

> >

> > Actually it has been estimated that between

> > 312,000 and 400,000 were there - not 1 million

>

>

> Estimated by who?


Independent fact checking charity (FullFact) using experts in crowd estimation.


https://fullfact.org/europe/peoples-vote-march-count/?utm_source=homepage&utm_medium=main_story


Don't know about their eyesight.

Not sure what page you are looking at - this is a small part cut and pasted from the link...



Claim


An estimated 1 million people marched for a People?s Vote on Saturday 23rd March.



Conclusion


It?s impossible to say with precision how many people attended the march. However experts in crowd estimation put the number at between 312,000 and 400,000.

And this...


Manchester Metropolitan University?s Professor Keith Still, said ?based on the visuals from the helicopter image, it?s between 312,000 and 400,000 people.?


This type of crowd estimation, called the Jacobs method, is done by dividing a crowd site area into sections, measuring the size of each section and then multiplying each area by the estimated density of people within that subsection.


How did the People?s Vote estimate 1 million?


The People?s Vote said they estimated the size of the crowd using information from staff and volunteers as well as examining aerial pictures from helicopters.


They said that ?peak crowd densities were estimated at 4.5 people per square metre?. (For context: Professor Still says the average crowd has between two and four people standing per square metre, and anything more than four people per square metre becomes too uncomfortable to move).


But even if this density of 4.5 people per square metre (visualised below) had been observed across the whole march site of roughly 160,000 square metres, that would only account for 700,000 people.

prof still's calculations are based on static crowds.

for those who have been on these marches, it's really interesting to see the rate of flow


these are dynamic crowds,

in the old days, marchers converged on a central point and then stood around to hear speeches

but no longer - the new style marchers turn out to be counted and then leave, making way for more people to flow into the space they have left - otherwise the numbers could never be accommodated in central london


the other interesting thing is how peaceful they are, these marches - no pushing, shoving or gilets jaunes, minimal police presence and not a broken window in sight

civilservant Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> prof still's calculations are based on static

> crowds.

> for those who have been on these marches, it's

> really interesting to see the rate of flow

>

> these are dynamic crowds,

> in the old days, marchers converged on a central

> point and then stood around to hear speeches

> but no longer - the new style marchers turn out to

> be counted and then leave, making way for more

> people to flow into the space they have left -

> otherwise the numbers could never be accommodated

> in central london

>

> the other interesting thing is how peaceful they

> are, these marches - no pushing, shoving or gilets

> jaunes, minimal police presence and not a broken

> window in sight



Yep.


We were with a group of people (including Helen Hayes) who joined the march at Green Park (he park, not the tube station) having started at Victoria.


There was a bottleneck of people trying to get out of Green Park into Piccadilly.


We got down to the screen in the Mall but couldn't get much further due to the crowds, so never got as far as Parliament Square.


And yes, there was no trouble at all, it was a really good natured and lovely day, we met some lovely people, including people who had come a really long way (felt a bit bad we just had quite a short journey there!)

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I fear it won't be so peaceful though if the will

> of the majority is ignored and the promises to

> carry out the referendum result are broken.

> Careful what you wish for!


I think panic about this is over-played. Just because Teresa May has spent the past two and a half years attempting to brainwash the country into believing that a 'full suicide' Brexit is the only way to honour a narrow majority in an advisory referendum offering no concrete vision of 'Leave', doesn't mean that anyone believes her. MPs are now, thank the Lord, taking some kind of initiative to examine the many options available. My question is : since it was obvious the day after the referendum that such a collaborative, cross-party approach was needed to work out a sensible way forward, why couldn't the government see that? I think we all know that's because their main concern was keeping hold of power, not what was best for the county.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> civilservant Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > prof still's calculations are based on static

> > crowds.

> > for those who have been on these marches, it's

> > really interesting to see the rate of flow

> >

> > these are dynamic crowds,

> > in the old days, marchers converged on a

> central

> > point and then stood around to hear speeches

> > but no longer - the new style marchers turn out

> to

> > be counted and then leave, making way for more

> > people to flow into the space they have left -

> > otherwise the numbers could never be

> accommodated

> > in central london

> >

> > the other interesting thing is how peaceful

> they

> > are, these marches - no pushing, shoving or

> gilets

> > jaunes, minimal police presence and not a

> broken

> > window in sight

>

>

> Yep.

>

> We were with a group of people (including Helen

> Hayes) who joined the march at Green Park (he

> park, not the tube station) having started at

> Victoria.

>

> There was a bottleneck of people trying to get out

> of Green Park into Piccadilly.

>

> We got down to the screen in the Mall but couldn't

> get much further due to the crowds, so never got

> as far as Parliament Square.

>

> And yes, there was no trouble at all, it was a

> really good natured and lovely day, we met some

> lovely people, including people who had come a

> really long way (felt a bit bad we just had quite

> a short journey there!)


I felt bad about that too. But I'm jolly glad I went!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The ones I've dropped into may be organised by PCSOs in the SNT but regular PCs have attended. They have actually been a cuppa with a copper, but not necessarily loads of them. 
    • @Pereira Neves "Cuppa with a Coppa" is a misrepresentation as PCSOs are not real police.   They have no more powers of arrest that any public citizen. They may have the "authority" to advise the regular police of a crime - just like Joe Public. One exception is that they can issue fixed penalty notices to people who cycle on a footpath. We see people cycling on the footpath every day but have never seen a PCSO issue a fixed penalty notice to anybody. No  qualifications are needed to become a PCSO.  At best, all they do is reassure and advise the public with platitudes.      
    • Right.  Already too many people saying “labour pushed for longer and more stringent lockdowns” which if nothing else, does seem to give credence the notion that yes people can be brainwashed    Nothing ...  Nothing Labour pushed for was about longer lockdowns.  Explicitly, and very clearly they said “lock down early OR we will be locking down for longer “   ie they were trying to prevent the longer lockdowns we had   But “positive thinking” and “nothing to see here” from Johnson led to bigger problems    as for the hand-wavery about the economic inheritance and markets being spooked by labour budget - look - things did get really really and under last government and they tried to hide it.  So when someone tries to address it, no one is going to be happy.  But pretending all was tickety boo is a child’s response 
    • What would you have done differently, Rockets? I cannot, for the life of me, think of a financial strategy that would have satisfied 'working people' and businesses and driven growth and reduced the deficit. But I'm no economist. On another note, since we're bashing Labour, one thing that really got my goat was Labour's reaction to  Kemi Badenoch being elected leader of the opposition. When our own dear Ellie Reeves was asked for her reaction to KB's election, the first thing she said was "I'm proud that she's the first black woman to lead a political party, but..." Congratulating someone for being black (she's Nigerian FFS, not 'black') and female is such an insult. You'd be forgiven for thinking that that's all Labour sees... and it completely detracts from her achievements as a politician. It's almost as if they were implying that she'd done well in spite of her race and sex. If that's not racist... I think Kemi is an absolute nut job. People in her own party have said she'd start a brawl in an empty room and would cross the street to bite your ankle. But that kind of makes me like her. And if anyone can hold Labour's feet to the fire, she can.  (Ex labour party member here, who voted Keir for leader of the party, BTW, in case anyone wants to start a pile-on and call me a Tory lover). 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...