Jump to content

Recommended Posts

http://www.paigntonpeople.co.uk/Follow-example-parking-charges/story-15108697-detail/story.html


Winge not East Dulwichians we are praised from afar !


I AM sure our councillors are all very nice individuals, but seem to have a collective 'head in the sand' mentality where parking meters are concerned.


Why is it they cannot see what we ordinary folk see, the town is dead because of parking meters and parking charges, yet they want to flood the town with more.


May I respectfully suggest they take a trip (not First Class) to East Dulwich, a very busy town in London where there are no parking meters and no empty shops?


There are a couple of parking attendants who patrol the streets advising people of the restrictions (bus lanes etc), and during many visits it seems few if any disregard these restrictions, or time limits displayed.


In the evenings after 6pm, and on Sundays, there are no restrictions at all. The place is buzzing day and night.


Alternatively, take a trip to North Allerton in Yorkshire, again no parking meters.


You obtain a paper clock, available in most shops, and display the time of arrival which allows you two hours' free parking.


If you are over the two hours then a warden can issue a ticket, but mostly it's 'a word in your ear'.


There are cheap car parks if you need more than two hours.


Again, no empty shops. The same system is used in most busy towns in Yorkshire and also Wiltshire.


In the aforementioned towns not only do the shops benefit, but the cafes and restaurants too as the shoppers delay their departure until rush hour is over.


Our traffic enforcers in Torquay seem to have standard issue stopwatches, woe betide you if you are a couple of minutes over the time paid for, a ticket is slapped on your screen.


My neighbour was six minutes over, his friend the day before four minutes over, all because they were caught in the slow queue at the bank or shop.


All the grand plans and bypass schemes for Torquay will come to nought if our councillors continue to follow this suicidal parking policy.


All those intended cruise ship passengers will be able to tell their friends about all those lovely empty beaches in Torbay.


I would respectfully suggest that our councillors remove their revenue raising blinkers, try cancelling all parking meter charges for two years, or alternatively charge 10p for two hours, so our enforcers know how long a car has been parked.


They may be surprised that the rates from the once-empty shops will outweigh the revenue earned from the parking meters.


If there are no feet on the streets then the town will die, can they not hear the death rattle? We ordinary folk can.


Ivan Cloherty


Lisburne Square


Torquay

Councillors like money

And they are supported by a small number of anti-car luddites who seem to think everyone else shares their smug 'idealism' and that parking restrictions mean no change for people from outside SE22 (say SE21, SE24, SE5) who will happily jump on a bus/train to pop down for some nick/nacks, foodies stuff or a beer/wine on the weekend.


It'll ruin SE22 as it has plenty of other places - many independent businesses here are on wafer thin margins and finding it tough enough in the recssion. Parking restriction evangicals FIGHT them, they are idiots.

eddie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I wonder if I can get someone to take the rap for

> my parking tickets, you know, like the Liberal

> Democrat MP who appears to have had his wife take

> his points for speeding? Oh well, perhaps not.


He's not the first and he won't be the last. It's not exactly difficult (provided your dopey ex-wife can keep her mouth shut).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...