Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Loutwo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Superdrug sell a range of various top branded

> perfumes as well as more affordable ones.

> Including Creed btw. Not sure why you conclude

> those same brands are somehow not quality just

> because they happen to be sold by a high street

> chain? Hope we aren?t back to the old arguments of

> being seen to buy stuff from a small independent

> just so people can see you going in there,

> regardless of the price?

>

> Louisa.



I go to Roulier White for the expertise of the staff tbh-I like niche fragrances its my weakness and my twice yearly indulgence-the staff there are really knowledgable and passionate about perfume.

I'm not a snob but for me personally a lot of the regular brands are a bit too chemical smelling for me or have base notes I don't like.

I'd buy make up in super drug but would always choose Roullier white for perfume

Incidentally I'm not a rich person but a shop assistant some people book luxury holidays I love nice unusal fragrances

My problem with Superdrug is not that it isn't gentrified enough for ED, but that it is too gentrified.


It's post-gentrification blandness. For a start, who is even going to want to be seen to be in there?


This sort of uniform identikit shop arriving is a very dangerous precedent for the rest of the just-about-gentrified-enough-now-thank-you high street.

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My problem with Superdrug is not that it isn't

> gentrified enough for ED, but that it is too

> gentrified.

>

> It's post-gentrification blandness. For a start,

> who is even going to want to be seen to be in

> there?

>

> This sort of uniform identikit shop arriving is a

> very dangerous precedent for the rest of the

> just-about-gentrified-enough-now-thank-you high

> street.



Well, there's already Cafe Nero, GBK, White Stuff, Sweaty Betty, Oliver Bonas and other chains. I think there's a pretty good mix of chains and independent shops at the moment.


I know what you mean, but I'd rather have Superdrug than the Londis which it is replacing. To the best of my knowledge, Londis didn't sell anything which you couldn't easily get elsewhere locally, whereas Superdrug will.


I just hope it won't affect Lloyds too much, but I mainly use Lloyds for prescriptions.


I won't be buying perfume, synthetic perfume makes me feel ill, so I use essential oils (now, I'd be happy to see Neals's Yard Apothecary open round here!)

Londis was a brilliant shop which had been part of the ED landscape since it?s 7/11 days and remained well used until recently. They sold the lottery, the biggest selection of papers and magazines anywhere in the local area, and more importantly were open until late. A rare thing around here.


Superdrug does not sell anything that independents, department stores and the likes of Neal?s Yard/Space NK do not already sell, but probably at a slightly cheaper price. It?s a chain, not everyone can afford independent prices, as much as they?d like to be able to support them. Why can?t we just be happy Superdrug has chosen our high street in a time when many high streets are declining rapidly.


Louisa.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Abe_froeman Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > My problem with Superdrug is not that it isn't

> > gentrified enough for ED, but that it is too

> > gentrified.

> >

> > It's post-gentrification blandness. For a

> start,

> > who is even going to want to be seen to be in

> > there?

> >

> > This sort of uniform identikit shop arriving is

> a

> > very dangerous precedent for the rest of the

> > just-about-gentrified-enough-now-thank-you high

> > street.

>

>

> Well, there's already Cafe Nero, GBK, White Stuff,

> Sweaty Betty, Oliver Bonas and other chains. I

> think there's a pretty good mix of chains and

> independent shops at the moment.

>

> I know what you mean, but I'd rather have

> Superdrug than the Londis which it is replacing.

> To the best of my knowledge, Londis didn't sell

> anything which you couldn't easily get elsewhere

> locally, whereas Superdrug will.

>

> I just hope it won't affect Lloyds too much, but I

> mainly use Lloyds for prescriptions.

>

> I won't be buying perfume, synthetic perfume makes

> me feel ill, so I use essential oils (now, I'd be

> happy to see Neals's Yard Apothecary open round

> here!)


Yes! Id LOVE a meals yard apothacary to open here I'd be overjoyed in fact!

I'd always go to Lloyds pharmacy for Pharmacy stuff over super drug but I find that Chemist on LL near the bus stop quite dreadful and REALLY overpriced! They wanted ?23.99 for something I knew I could buy at Lloyds for ?20.99 so I put it back and walked round the corner to Lloyds

Hi Louisa

I prefer to support the independents where I possibly can. It really has nothing to do with "being seen to go in there". Its more to do with getting the advice I need, when I'm buying a product. i have used Superdrug in the past, and the advice I was given wasn't helpful.



Loutwo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Superdrug sell a range of various top branded

> perfumes as well as more affordable ones.

> Including Creed btw. Not sure why you conclude

> those same brands are somehow not quality just

> because they happen to be sold by a high street

> chain? Hope we aren?t back to the old arguments of

> being seen to buy stuff from a small independent

> just so people can see you going in there,

> regardless of the price?

>

> Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think it's connected with the totem pole renovation celebrations They have passed now, but the notice has been there since then (at least that's when I first saw it - I passed it on the 484 and also took a photo!)
    • Labour was damned, no matter what it did, when it came to the budget. It loves go on about the black hole, but if Labour had had its way, we'd have been in lockdown for longer and the black hole would be even bigger.  Am I only the one who thinks it's time the NHS became revenue-generating? Not private, but charging small fees for GP appts, x-rays etc? People who don't turn up for GP and out-patient appointments should definitely be charged a cancellation fee. When I lived in Norway I got incredible medical treatment, including follow up appointments, drugs, x-rays, all for £200. I was more than happy to pay it and could afford to. For fairness, make it somehow means-tested.  I am sure there's a model in there somewhere that would be fair to everyone. It's time we stopped fetishising something that no longer works for patient or doctor.  As for major growth, it's a thing of the past, no matter where in the world you live, unless it's China. Or unless you want a Truss-style, totally de-regulated economy and love capitalism with a large C. 
    • If you read my post I expect a compromise with the raising of the cap on agricultural property so that far less 'ordinary' farmers do not get caught  Clarkson is simply a high profile land owner who is not in the business as a conventional farmer.  Here's a nice article that seems to explain things well  https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/nov24-farming-budget-inheritance-tax-apr/ It's too early to speculate on 2029.  I expect that most of us who were pleased that Labour got in were not expecting anything radical. Whilst floating the idea of hitting those looking to minimise inheritance tax, including gifting, like fuel duty they also chickened put. I'm surprised that anyone could start touting for the Tories after 14 years of financial mismanagement and general incompetence. Surly not.  A very low bar for Labour but they must be well aware that there doesn't need to be much of a swing form Reform to overturn Labour's artificially large majority.  But even with a generally rabid right wing press, now was the opportunity to be much braver.
    • And I worry this Labour government with all of it's own goals and the tax increases is playing into Farage's hands. With Trump winning in the US, his BFF Farage is likely to benefit from strained relations between the US administration and the UK one. As Alastair Campbell said on a recent episode of The Rest is Politics who would not have wanted to be a fly on the wall of the first call between Angela Rayner and JD Vance....those two really are oil and water. Scary, scary times right now and there seems to be a lack of leadership and political nous within the government at a time when we really need it - there aren't many in the cabinet who you think will play well on the global stage.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...