Fred Goodwin...sir

[Undisputedtruth]

This is the kind of stupidness that I'm often faced with, Bob.

Edited to add: If I've humiliated Otta then he only have himself to blame.

[El Pibe]

"This is the kind of stupidness that I'm often faced with, Bob."

I reckon you can probably research hubris on Wikipedia too.

[Undisputedtruth]

Like I said 'Hubris' isn't the right word to describe me and to be frank no one in my lifetime have successfully put a label on me either.

[AGW3]

No need to be like this Udt. Katie is a wonderful person.

[maxxi]

AGW3 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No need to be like this Udt. Katie is a wonderful

> person.

I bet she planted that!

[Otta]

  Quote

If I've humiliated Otta then

he only have himself to blame.

[Otta]

  Quote

If I've humiliated Otta then

he only have himself to blame.

I am very humbled.

[Undisputedtruth]

AGW3 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No need to be like this Udt. Katie is a wonderful

> person.

I've met her in person and she's a nasty piece of work. She tried to get me banned by getting my name associated with a another banned member.

[Otta]

Dude, you are special!

[Undisputedtruth]

Otta, don't stop your tirade.

[LuLu Too]

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Like I said 'Hubris' isn't the right word to

> describe me and to be frank no one in my lifetime

> have successfully put a label on me either.

F60.1?

[Otta]

Tirade of compliments to your awesomeness you mean?

[Moos]

*crying with laughter*

[Undisputedtruth]

LuLu Too Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Undisputedtruth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Like I said 'Hubris' isn't the right word to

> > describe me and to be frank no one in my

> lifetime

> > have successfully put a label on me either.

>

>

> F60.1?

Not even that.

[katie1997]

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> AGW3 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > No need to be like this Udt. Katie is a

> wonderful

> > person.

>

> I've met her in person and she's a nasty piece of

> work. She tried to get me banned by getting my

> name associated with a another banned member.

I'd like to say thanks AGW3 but I don't know who you are or if I do, I don't know your posting name from your one in real life.

As for you, UDT, you met me once, briefly, at another forumites birthday drinks ages ago. Now I don't particularly mind if you thought I was a nasty piece of work as we're not ever going to be friends so who cares but what I would like to know - if you bother to answer - is why you think 'I tried to get you banned by associating you with another banned forumite'. I haven't done any such thing and I think you should get your facts straight before posting stuff like that about me.

[maxxi]

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> AGW3 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > No need to be like this Udt. Katie is a

> wonderful

> > person.

>

> I've met her in person and she's a nasty piece of

> work.

I've met her too and I thought she was perfectly delightful - but now I realise that was what she wanted me to think - an idea she planted in my head.

I know this because I started to feel light-headed and queasy around the 6th pint and even had a kebab on the way home... and that's not like me.

[Undisputedtruth]

I'm certain that my facts are straight.

[Undisputedtruth]

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Am I the only one who thinks Otta has been really

> good-humoured and patient, considering the depths

> of idiocy this thread has sunk to?

You deliberately overlooked Otta's behaviour where he called me an idiot several times.

[Huguenot]

Katie1997, I think UDT is referring to a thread many moons ago initiated by New Nexus, where we entertained ourselves for some hours by trying to guess the real identities behind new posters such as New Nexus and UDT who had peculiar, caricatured (almost comic book) personalities.

They were so extraordinary we couldn't believe they were real.

I, for one, now think UDT must be a creation of Ted Max so exceptional that we may as well think him real.

However, UDT in that 'special' way of thinking he has, assumed we were trying to get him banned. He was of course incorrect, but his paranoia seems to sweep all before it.

If I recall correctly, none of the proposed alter egos had actially been banned, although HAL9000 was on one of his holidays....

[Laddy Muck]

UDT, you have made me really sad here. I know you quite well from our football team and have never had a problem with you. However, I really do think that what you have said about our lovely Katie (and she is lovely) is well out of order.

Katie, I hope you are alright. Am seeing you later on today. I'll try to be on time.;-) xxx

[Undisputedtruth]

LM, you may recall our discussion on Katie back in August. But here's a link to what Katie did http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,729998,page=17

I'm pretty sure I could find a more few posts where Katie tried slinging more mud.

[Huguenot]

Well on the link you provided katie1997 made a couple of lighthearted quips about your similarlity with another member of what I refer to lovingly as the 'lunatic fringe', and when you took offence apologised several times.

It seems here only error on that page was saying sorry?

[Undisputedtruth]

I'm very sensitive to such accusations. Especially as I was temporarily suspended after being accused of being Attila or MikeCG.

[Huguenot]

Ah, well we weren't to know, and I'm sure no such outcome was intended or katie1997 would have had my number years ago ;-)

[Undisputedtruth]

I wonder, Hugo.