Jump to content

Recommended Posts

m.guardian.co.uk/money/2011/sep/02/mortgage-application-cheats-hmrc?cat=money&type=article


www.lawsociety.org.uk/productsandservices/practicenotes/mortgagefraud.page


en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortgage_fraud



m.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/aug/30/mortgage-fraud-increase?cat=business&type=article


There you go UDT, that should get you started.

www.fsa. gov.uk/.. /mortgage_fraud .pdf


" Mortgage fraud became a feature of the

pre- 2007 lending boom"


There you go, if you need specifics. You really can't read between lines, or understand that it is possible to have more than one guilty party, can you?


What an idiot you are.


Poor thing.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> www.fsa. gov.uk/.. /mortgage_fraud .pdf

>

> " Mortgage fraud became a feature of the

> pre- 2007 lending boom"

>

> There you go, if you need specifics. You really

> can't read between lines, or understand that it is

> possible to have more than one guilty party, can

> you?

>

> What an idiot you are.

>

> Poor thing.


Of course there was mortgage fraud in the pre-financial crisis. The point I was making is that the Ordinary Joes were victims of the financial crisis, you dope.

Obviously, my research skills are better than yours. But then I do have a greater understanding of the financial crisis, unlike you.


I do agree that my sentence doesn't always read well and that's because my typing doesn't keep pace with my thinking. You're such a dope, you wouldn't recognise a genius if you saw one.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Katies, your behaviour on this thread isn't a

> shining example either.


I know. Its because if I'm honest, I have forgotten it was supposed to be about Fred the Shred and his Knighthood being redacted. Not a place to show off and brag about my extensive skills with Excel. And Powerpoint.


> Otta had a problem with me for a very long time

> and his over-usage of swear words doesn't make

> good reading as well.


Well, from reading the forum from the outside looking in, it appears that you're the one who has the problem with Otta, not the other way round - and not just on this thread either.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unfortunately, when you have people like Katie and

> Hugo planting ideas into other people's head then

> there will be problems.


Gosh, what ideas am I supposed to have been planting into other people's heads exactly? What ideas? What people? Go on, I'm really interested in what you have to say. For once.

Bob, perhaps there is a certain arrogance on my part when I constantly see stupidness coming from other people. Until people can behave in any reason way then I can't see why I should change my own behaviour. I certainly don't suffer from an overestimation of one's own competence or capabilities so 'Hubris' isn't the right word.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would disagree that the tables outside the Blue Brick bothered nobody. They were not within the cafe's curtilage (one table was even placed on the other side of the road!) but on a narrow public footpath where pedestrians have a "public right of way". Added to that, some customers rearranged the tables so the footpath was blocked completely. 
    • Walking last Friday early evening anywhere near where the bottom end of Lordship Lane meets the Goose Green roundabout, one would have been directly confronted - as I was - with this scene: Outside the East Dulwich Tavern an impenetrable phalanx of pushing yobs, shouty louts and selfish yahoos pressed outward from the open doors of this establishment, past the curtilage (the land in front of and owned by the business), all across the public right of way, to the kerbside. This was the situation all the way along, end to end. I watched as passersby, old people, children, parents with buggies, people just going about their business, were forced by these booze-sucking bellowing scumbags onto the road - where, at that hour, traffic rushed endlessly off the roundabout. We have, I realised, somehow become so used to this revolting spectacles as to believe it to be inevitable. It is not. This is why I'm dropping this post. Enough really is enough. This roiling boozy blockade represents a total failure by all the responsible authorities - the licencing authority, for example - but most of all (yet once more, again, as ever), by Southwark Council. Two very different comparisons to give you some perspective: 1. The Kings Head pub on the corner of Albermarle and Stafford Streets, London SW1. Here too, patrons like to drink and chat outside on a warm evening - why should they not. But here, on the latter side a line marks the curtilage on the pavement. Drinkers remain, respectfully, in good order, within the line, watched, quietly and carefully, by a security guard. I wager good money this arrangement is a condition of this pub's licence. 2. The Blue Brick is a cafe in the quiet backstreets of East Dulwich, on the corners of Fellbrigg and Shawbury Roads. Until a few months ago, about half its covers were tables out on the pavement. They bothered nobody. Oh! But they extended all of several centimetres too far into the footpath, so into fearless action swang Southwark Council officers - and now these tables are gone. Result, eh? "Well you see," some wiseacre said to me, "There needs to be a complaint." Not actually true, but for sure this is all too often how local authorities get pushed to do what they should be doing. Hard to think why a complaint trumps, say (and god forbid!) a child being injured on the road. In which circumstance, of course!, Southwark would swing into noisy, virtue-signalling, belated action. But in any case let this post be considered a big, very definite COMPLAINT about this prolonged abuse of our public right of way. I invite readers who agree with me to add their voices. Oh, and all those wee local ward councillors might get off their chufties, defy their party managers, and actually help sort this scandal out. Thanks for reading, Lee Scoresby
    • Hi there, I saw that Google lists the park opening time as 7:30am, but I was wondering if it might actually open earlier than that - maybe anyone who’s out running early or passing by has noticed?  
    • We are thrilled to announce that Little Stars Creche in Dulwich will be opening its doors on 28th April and we would love to invite you and your little ones to an open day. Parents, carers and children aged 18 month to 5 years can meet our team and visit our wonderful setting.  Little Stars is a fun creative space for children aged 2 to 4 years to enjoy whilst parents and carers get some well needed time to catch up on life! We are so excited to bring this much-needed service to the community, and we want to thank all the wonderful parents and carers for participating in our recent survey. Your feedback was invaluable in shaping Little Stars and ensuring it meets the needs of local families. For full information about Little Stars and a detailed schedule please visit our webpage here: Little Stars Crèche We can’t wait to meet you and your little stars soon!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...