Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have a friend who rents the upstairs flat in a converted Victorian terrace. The downstairs flat is occupied by its owner. The upstairs flat is owned by friend's landlord. One day the downstairs person decided to bring his two bikes out from the cold and keep them in the communal hallway. Problem being it's not the widest of hallways so you have to squeeze past if you have any shopping to carry and frequently end up with ripped bags, caught clothing, bruises etc. When my friend asked the guy if he could store the bikes in his garden instead, being so much in the way, he refused, and with regard to being a safety hazard in the event of a fire, he said his fire service mate had said they posed no risk. Can this be right? Is he bluffing? Anyone got any experience dealing with this kind of thing?

LOL nette.....


As the upstairs flat is rented and the hallway is communal it WOULD come under fire safety legislation as designated under the Housing Act 2004 and the Regulatory Reform (Safety Order) 2005.


Landlords are required to satisfy a whole range of requirements which includes any passageway that may constitute a means of escape.


Here is a link to the document the fire service uses. It clearly states that stairways and hallways that are means of escape should be kept clear of obstruction.


LACORS fire safety


Paragraph 32.4 couldn't be clearer I think and it a legal requirement of your landlord to ensure this is the case.


Give a copy to your neighbour and get your own fire safety inspection done if he won't move the bicycles. Hope that helps.

The fact that ordinary homes don't have fire exits doesn't mean that ordinary exits shouldn't work as exits when there's a fire, and landlords have a duty to keep common areas that act as exits, even if they're not fire exits, clear. That applies even when the landlord can claim to be 'resident', the tenancy isn't assured, the home isn't either a purpose-built flat or a house of multiple occupation and the lousy council can't even be bothered to run a register or organize routine inspections (it's not, admittedly, a legal requirement. Not outside most civilised countries, at any rate).


Where the landlord is right is in that bicycles are not a particular risk in a fire - the tyres aren't likely to burst explosively, and most bicycles don't burn very well. But we're not talking obout the risk they pose in a fire, it's the risk they pose in a fire exit. I am sure the landlord won't have consciously worded the question so weaselishly, but that sort of occupational habit becomes quickly ingrained.


The problem is what to do about it. The first bit, complaining to the landlord, has been done. In the old days, you would next complain to the environmental health department who would send a letter to the landlord requesting an appointment, at his or her convenience if it wasn't too much trouble, and when they hadn't got a reply then, with the full force of the law behind them, would forget the whole thing safe in the knowledge that, in the meantime, the landlord would serve a notice to quit, pocket the deposit and stick the rent up in time for their next victim. That happened to me twice.


Environmental health aren't even that useful now. And housing offices have their own death traps to sort out. The fire brigade might helped once, but they're now targeting 'vulnerable' people, and aren't likely to see view lives of ordinary tenants as a particularly high priority.


The best I can find is a reference to a 'private tenancies team' on the council's website. They claim to offer advice, though it's not clear if that's just for people in private tenancies obtained through the council, or for those suffering with their own money, too. I doubt their advice will be very helpful, unless the tenants haven't already thought of moving house, but it's probably worth trying. They're coy and confusing about contact details, but they're supposedly on 020 7525 4113.

Ah so, lots of food for thought here. I like your thinking, folks ;-)


DJQ, thanks for that link. These points are particularly apt, and may put my friend in a stronger position than he realised:


32.4 Escape routes:

must be free from obstruction at all times, and

regular checks should be made to guarantee this;

there should be no free storage on the escape

routes;

there should be no trip hazards such as trailing

electrical leads or worn carpets; (which might apply to bicycle wheels and pedals particularly as the bikes are just propped against the wall)


Burbage: Thanks for your points, however, in this case the issue isn't with my friend's landlord who owns the upstairs flat, it's with the owner-occupier of the downstairs flat. He really seems to resent having anyone living above him and has at times made life there quite unpleasant. My friend's landlord is OK, but a bit hands-off, so if it can be resolved this without getting him involved, it might be easier all round.

We had this problem for a while in our hallway, and it was solved by using one of these wall mounted bike racks to lift one bike up whilst the other rested on the ground underneath. Cost about ?15. If one of these could be installed, then you'd have one bike up on the wall and one on the ground which should give you enough space to get past. Might be the easiest solution.

Can't he be persuaded to buy a bike rack and hang them off the wall/ceiling? That removes them from being an obstruction in the hallway and you're all friends again?


ETA: ah Twirly beat me to it. There are ones that suspend off the ceiling too, if there's sufficient height; which clears up all the floor space and stops you banging into things.

Check out the legal situation first, and have some evidence that he's in the wrong. Present him with the bike rack solution, and if he prevaricates, then tell him that if he's not willing to do this, then you will have to take it further. If he still objects, then show him printouts from wherever that shows that the exit should be clear. If all else fails, get your landlord involved/check it out with the CAB. Good luck!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It might just be the element, they are often easier to replace than you might think. You can find videos on youtube and websites like espares stock them. 
    • Live Last updated: Today, 9:53 PM Fire at shop - Forest Hill Today 18:27   Lewisham   Fire at commercial property Share this page Twitter Facebook Email ) Fifteen fire engines and around 100 firefighters have been called to a fire at a property on Perry Vale in Forest Hill. The fire involves a building made up of a shop on the ground floor, with flats above. The fire has affected the ground, first and second floors of the building. As of 2145 hrs, part of the ground floor shop remains alight, as well as part of the first and second floors. A single-storey workshop to the rear of the shop also remains partially alight. Around 15 people were evacuated from surrounding buildings. At this time, there have been no reports of any injuries. Station Commander Anthony Lewis, who is at the scene, said: "This will be a protracted incident, with crews working through the night to fully extinguish this fire. "We're advising people in the local area to continue to keep windows and doors closed due to smoke travel. "A 25-metre cordon is currently in place and the public are advised to avoid the area at this time.  "Significant traffic disruption can be expected in the Forest Hill area, including in the A205 South Circular Road. Rail services via Forest Hill station are also being affected as a result of this fire." The Brigade received the first of 49 calls at 1827 and Control Officers have mobilised crews from Forest Hill, Lewisham, Beckenham, West Norwood and surrounding fire stations to the scene. A 32-metre turntable ladder is also in attendance and is being used as a water tower to extinguish the fire from above. The Brigade has also deployed a drone to provide the Incident Commander with a greater situational awareness of the fire. The cause of the fire is unknown at this time.
    • Hi there, you're unlikely to be in the catchment for Horniman from underhill as it's minuscule but would definitely be in the catchment for Goodrich.  For secondary you'd be in the catchment for Sydenham girls and Harris ED but also probably for charter Ed from the pattern of the last couple of years - not in previous years - but possibly on the waiting list rather than getting a place on offers day.  It's of course hard to know for sure what the secondary situation will be when your daughter reaches 11 but that's the current situation at least. Hope that helps x    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...