Jump to content

social cycle ride Feb 2nd 10-12 noon Dulwich Park


Sally Eva

Recommended Posts

AKA the Crystal Palace Loop which starts by going up from Dulwick Clock Cafe (or further up for people like me who come from Peckham). The idea, good in itself, is to get the pain over early and start with the uphill bit and then cruise home mostly downhill.


The Cafe is at SE21 7BQ -- in the centre of the park by the pond. The route heads along College Road and up to Crystal Palace Park. This is quite a steep climb towards the Crystal Palace end and extra time has been factored in for pushing. It gets better at the top with a downhill ride to the dinosaurs, down to the bottom and across to the Waterlink Way (national cycle route 21) via Cator Park.


The Waterlink Way is a gem for those who don't know it. Flat, entirely off-road, and follows the banks of the Ravensbourne until it turns into Deptford Creek. It runs from South Norwood Country Park near Elmers End Station to the Cutty Sark -- eight mostly very pretty miles. Picture to prove it has pretty bits is attached. It doesn't all look like this.


There won't be time to make the loop include the Thames but there will be a long stretch mostly off road north along Waterlink Way to Ladywell Fields before heading back to Dulwich for 12 noon via LCN22 and Peckham Rye Park. The route is here: https://goo.gl/rfUzwn (anti-clockwise)


These messages are brought to you on behalf of Southwark Cyclists (the borough branch of the London Cycling Campaign) and some very special people known as Bruce Lynn and friends. They organise these weekly Saturday rides, sort out the routes and lead them keeping everyone safe. Everything is free and everyone is welcome.


The rides are free, as flat as can be arranged, most last two hours (like this one) but one a month is longer to stretch those muscles and investigate new routes. Our website is here: https://southwarkcyclists.org.uk and you can contact us on [email protected], PM me here or text Bruce on 07729 279 945

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't care particularly for McAsh, the Greens or their drugs policy, but this "Greens will feed your children crack at school" stuff from the Daily Mail is just hysterical nonsense. Labour should be ashamed for seeding it - and the Mail doesn't know any better. Meanwhile, I can't remember the exact Tweet I saw recently but it was something like "some people who believe all politicians are out to enrich themselves only say that because they can't imagine serving their community for its own sake". The idea that serving as a local councillor (including dealing with the public, internal party politics - which is always the most vicious where the stakes are lowest, and plenty of unpaid prep work) is a great pathway for careerists and moneygrabbers is utter shite. On a per hour basis you'd be far better off working at Sainsbos.
    • That’s awful - I really hope no one is seriously injured. It might be worth updating the title so it clearly reflects what happened: a driver crashed into a pedestrian. The way we describe collisions matters, because it shapes how people understand responsibility and risk. If a cyclist hit someone, it would sound odd to say “bike hit pedestrian” without mentioning the rider - yet when cars are involved, the driver often disappears from the wording. Using accurate language isn’t about blaming anyone before the facts are known; it’s simply about recognising that vehicles don’t act on their own. Drivers have agency, and it would be helpful if the wording reflected that.
    • Sorry if that was me. I felt the context of their wider aims and policies was relevant to the decision of our local incumbent representative to join the Greens. After all, the excuses he gives for jumping ships are blamed on national party politics and not on local issues. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...