Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I agree with your time frame. I went to Liverpool in 96, and didn't really come back much at all until I moved back in 2001, and I was surprised by the changes both in ED and Camberwell.


At that stage, only the EDT had really changed, and was packed every weekend. Up in Camberwell you had the funky munky and the Red Star which at that time was also packed at the weekends. It was strange seeing a nightlife in this area, having spent my late teens always going over to see friends around New Cross and Blackheath.


Between 2002 and 2004 everything seemed to start opening, all the pubs were getting done up, and Lordship Lane was taking it's current form. Funny though that in some ways it still seems the same as it was when I was a little kid.

Surely it was inevitable that ED would go upmarket at some time when Dulwich Village became too expensive for a group of upwardly mobile people, who then colonised ED. The same thing early happened to Herne Hill - in the Swinging Sixties when I had a girlfriend living there, it was very much 'erne 'ill.


It has happened all over London. The village part of my old stomping ground of Walthamstow has become fashionable because people can no longer afford to live in Woodford Green and Wanstead.

Actually when i think about it ED was on its way up back in the eighties. I lived in camberwell in the late eighties and was an avid reader of City Limits who once recommended the original East Dulwich Deli near the EDT as a great place to get real, fresh parmesan. I distinctly remember my first pioneering trip over denmark hill to lordship lane to invest in a chunk. A couple of years later Mr Lui got a mention in a best chinese round-up and i tried that. Then in about 1989 the EDT started running comedy nights and I became a regular there. The rest is lost in a blur of frenzied upwardly mobile history. Maybe Blue Mountain customers can be divided into those who first used it pre- and post-mosaics.

We lived in Brixton for 5 years and I never set foot in East Dulwich for all of that time (no tube !). Then we had a baby in 1994 and someone told me that you could go to a shop in a place called Lordship Lane that sold maternity bras. That was Hey Diddle Diddle (corner of Hansler and LL).


We had a coffee in the Blue Mountain and the rest dear readers is history........

Just to show how old I am (43) i remember when the only eating place apart from Savarins greasy spoon down LL when i was a kid was "The Spartan Grill" which was directly next to Somerfield. Then later "Never On a Sunday" opened up where i believe Spaghetti westerns is now. Yilmaz's which is next to Hissar; was great in the 80's because it stayed opened until you left. many a time me and a few friends from the Magdala Football team crawled out of there about 5am on a sunday morning.
Surely it's our old favorite demographics which change an area. We are merely the pawns in an over large game of chess over which we have little or no control. The estate agents move in afterwards like the parasites they are. I should know. Er, yes, it was a good lunch thanks.
I am inclined to agree with ????, it was Blue Mountain (with their home made chocolate eclairs on a Thursday), The Thai Corner Cafe and Grace and Favour. Before Blue Mountain, there was really only Le Chardon and Springers, Walshes the Glaziers, 7-11, The Old Palmerston and some tumbleweed. The curry houses of choice were Mirash, Eastern Eye or Surma. The area around Lordship Lane has been very middle class for quite a while. The late 90's saw an influx of young professional families. I even remember the first "it" pram. It was a Landrover 3 wheeler. The don't make them anymore - bless!

Back in 1995 a good friend moved into the flats opposite Kings on the Rye near the estate agent Burnett Ware and Graves. I didn't live in London then. My mother in law, ex of Balham, stated "there is no such place as East Dulwuich, its Peckham". The friend who lived here refused to answer my questions about it (I hadn't visited) because"it's not great and there is no way you are ever going to live here so there's no point telling you". He had me down as too suburban.

Move forward to 2001, priced out of Greenwich where we were living, we came, saw houses we could afford, and moved here. The friend had moved out and up to St John's Wood, then to Highgate, and is now in Wanstead. So plenty of mobility for East Dulwichites?

> "there is no such place as East Dulwuich, its

> Peckham".


Yes I heard that too - from the wife of a colleague who grew up in Forest Hill and attended Fairlawn Primary school thirty years ago - she thought the idea that East Dulwcih was distinct from Peckham was hilarious.

It all started in 1983 when my future wife moved into ED. Marked acceleration when I joined the local throng in 1986 and finally stratospheric heights were reached when we married in 1997. Oh, and the baby/kiddy thing took off after the birth of our daughter in 1996. Simple really - I'm surprised nobody else has noticed.


Incidentally, Blue Mountain started in a shop near the old Co-op building just beyond the southern end of Rye Lane (opposite the end of Nigel Road) although it was called something different. It changed its name to BM and moved to ED - clearly sensing the zeitgeist of the time - or perhaps helping to create it.

Yes, the old crap about East Dulwich= Peckham.....SE15=Peckham SE22=East Dulwich, erm there's also a long eatblshed train station in SE22 called, erm, East Dulwich. So tell your mum-in-law and your mate they talk crap East Dulwich is not an estate agent's fabricatio but a long established postal district of London, ironically Peckhm was ctually posher for a long time.

"We moved here in 1999 and my uncle who lives in Brixton said it was quite "posh" already."


Well it was compared to Brixton, but Brixton always had a much more edgy atmosphere than ED could ever have, and seemed attract people with more money, mainly because house prices were higher, due to having the underground. I suppose it's hard to imagine that ED didn't have a train service on Sundays before the early 1990s, and that off-peak train services were even less frenquent than they are now (believe it or not).


"The friend had moved out and up to St John's Wood, then to Highgate, and is now in Wanstead."


It may be mobile, but I'm not sure that ending up in Wanstead could be considered upwardly mobile. I'd rather chew my foot off than go to live there. Not that keen on the though of living in St John's Wood or Highgate (too close to Archway) either.

"Gentrification comes after regeneration."


I don't agree with this. Gentrification predates regeneration in lots of places e.g. Notting Hill and even parts of Camberwell, where regeneration has never really took place. Also, in terms of ED, it's never really been either regenerated or gentrified, but the demographics of the area have definitely changed as its housing stock and location became more appealing to a broader range of people, for reasons other than direct intervention or regeneration. Certainly nothing approaching the Bellenden model.

> suppose it's hard to imagine that ED didn't have a train service on Sundays before the early 1990s


Perhaps because it's not true?


Passenger Services Timetable 16th September 1957

Table 65

East Dulwich to London Bridge

SUNDAY

07:46

08:08

08:26

08:38

08:46

08:56

09:08

09:16

09:26

and so on

to

23:52

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...