Jump to content

** SOLD ** Victorian Compactum / Gentleman's Wardrobe ?150 ono ** SOLD **


Recommended Posts

** SOLD now, thanks for the interest **


We are sadly having to part with this Victorian Compactum, which my Partner has owned and loved for many years. I believe it is made of walnut, but I could be mistaken.


The phot's attached are of the wardrobe in use, in the previous house.


It has been stored in our garage for the last couple of years, and no longer suits the new property, so has to go.


It is in fair condition, but needs a bit of TLC.


Dimensions are;

width - 1820mm (inc Base)

Height - 2010mm

Depth - 530mm


The unit splits into 5 pieces;

Base

Pelmet..?

Tall hanging cupboard with mirror

3 Drawer cupboard with slide-out drawers

5 Drawer base unit


Any questions, or if you wish to view, please send PM.


Thanks


Steve

Oops,


Sorry Olivia and everyone else.


Looking at approx ?150 for the Compactum


We're not in a hurry to sell it, it just makes sense to start the ball rolling.


The unit is assembled, in the garage, so can be viewed, and 'some' help will be given the purchasers to move it.



If someone does want it, but can't take it immediately, then, we'd ask for a deposit and a confirmed collection date.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Let them go bust.  Enact emergency legislation to ensure that the water still flows and the rest of the network operates. Why should we care what happens to the investors.  Have no idea could or would this work, and where next. And the workers will still be needed whoever runs the show.
    • I think you might mean 'repossession' rather than 'reprocessing'.  
    • I think this is a bit of a myth.  It's true that some of the current owners are pension funds (chiefly the Ontario Universities') but they're global outfits, big enough to know what they're about. As for ordinary UK pension funds, they mostly invest in publicly-tradeable stocks, which Thames no longer is (it's a private limited company, not a PLC), so even those that lazily track the markets by buying everything in the index won't be exposed as Thames isn't in any index. In other words, it's a lot less complicated than Thames, the Government or innumerable consultancies and PR outfits would like you to believe. In case, incidentally, the idea of a cooperative offends any delicate Thatcherite sensibilities, I'd argue that it fits the Thatcherite vision of a stakeholding democracy much better than selling tradeable shares to the public very cheaply. The public, despite their blessable cottons, are too easily tempted by the small but easy win (which is how they sold off their own building societies, preparing the ground for the credit crunch and then the crash) and, as became obvious after every privatisation before or since, their modest stakes inevitably end up in the hands of financial engineers whose only priority is to siphon off the assets and leave the husk to either go bankrupt or get "rescued" by the taxpayers (who thus get to pay twice for nothing). The root of that is the concept of "limited liability" which makes it all possible, but even the most nauseating free-market optimist would struggle to predict the demise of that.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...