Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm glad this is providing everyone with a bit of harmless amusement. As someone who live very near,at the moment there are about 20 bottles and it's making me feel sick. Try laughing when they leave it on your doorstep and your children find it

L

computedshorty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> So he certainly takes chances, and has the

> bottle,

> slows right down then foot off of the throttle.

> Nips to the wall to place his fresh product

> there,

> then back into the car and drive off like a Hare


How do you know what I drive like? Do I know you? :)

16,699 Views 167 posts on this subject..


When will people realize someone out there is seeking attention and is getting it here on this Forum.


(Probably think they are some kind of Banksy)


I Guarantee that someone is enjoying this attention by reading these comments and that if people

stop posting or the thread is Closed/Deleted.. the problem will stop.


Fox..

maria Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Probably not if they are a cab driver who spends

> his time pissing in his car!


Average person pees 1.5 - 2 litres in 24 hr period..

depends on how much fluid intake.


Driver is not going to spend 24 hours in his cab.. Probably 8 hours.


Assuming he stops for a sandwich (cafe)? he will have toilet facilities.


And will spend the rest of his time at home..


cannot possible fill the amout of bottles being left out..


Fox.

I Guarantee that someone is enjoying this attention by reading these comments and that if people

stop posting or the thread is Closed/Deleted.. the problem will stop.


Fox..





...but the bottles had been appearing there long before this thread started. So your theory is unlikely to be right.

Nicholas Spears Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I Guarantee that someone is enjoying this

> attention by reading these comments and that if

> people

> stop posting or the thread is Closed/Deleted.. the

> problem will stop.

>

> Fox..

>

>

>

>

> ...but the bottles had been appearing there long

> before this thread started. So your theory is

> unlikely to be right.


What ??



People would not of been posting before the bottles were appearing.. would they. ??


They started posting in responce to the bottles appearing..


Fox..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...