Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Been with 3 for about six or seven years and pretty faultless in my experience. I agree with Shell... no reason I can see for the (previously) poor image. I think people were just a bit sniffy about the cheaper new kid on the block.


Think 3 used to be a bit behind the others in terms of getting the latest phones but not any more.

i was with them on a dongle modem ?10.00 for 1gb of data, but computer was always getting attacked with trojons, i loged all the ip's of them and they all came from china, "the original owners of the network" also customer service told me to click a box in explorer to delete internet pages on exit, which will cause you to use more data again, the idea is to make the page load faster next time you visit.

it was actually leading to 30 pound a month, its ok for emails but when i skype to the usa amd spain it ate all my data.


im with a company and i pay 4.99 amonth for 10 gb through the landline.


but you could have it free if you pick up btzone on wifi, but you will have to know someone with bt broadband and share there pass key, if a few of you chiped in for the connection and share the cost you could get unlimited for a few pound a month each. and any ware you travel.

I'm with 3, very happy with reception and Internet speeds on 3G seem quicker. Much better than O2 which used to drop calls in my house all the time.


I also got ?110 cash back when I joined and got the new iPhone. All you can eat data is cool and also if you have an iPad you can tether it to the phone. This is also free but other providers charge for this. Double winning.

MelonSmasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The reception around The Grove side of Lordship

> Lane is barely functional, for some reason I've

> still been with 3 for a few years. Same problem

> every time round. No complaints apart from that

> one though. Their customer service and the rest is

> great.


I use 3 for their mobile broadband at this end of LL. Until 2009, it was barely usable with only one bar of reception, since the agreement with Everything Everywhere (T-Mobile/Orange) to use their base stations the reception is so much better. I now get 4-5 bars on my dongle and get faster data speeds.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you for clarifying, James. So why would anybody want to take this on as a franchise if it is staying in this building? If it is now to be a sub office, does that mean that much of  the space could be used as a different kind of business altogether, with just part of it being used as a sub Post Office? Because if it is all to remain solely for Post Office business, (albeit as a sub Post Office it won't be providing all the services which it currently does) I can't see who would want to take it over? If it isn't profitable as a Crown office, how could it be  profitable running just as a sub office, even if staff are being paid less and it's opening for longer hours? Because presumably all the other overheads such as rent will remain the same?
    • Girobank was genuinely innovative, regarding the addressed customer base (significantly the previously unbanked) - but this would have been an ideally outsourced operation to an existing bank which already had the operational systems (and the regulatory experts) to manage a bank for someone else at marginal cost. The Post Office - when you consider the issues over the Horizon software - never originally designed by ICL/ Fujitsu for the application it ran - is a very good reason why the Post Office being involved in banking was long-term a bad idea.  To get back to the topic of this thread, the Horizon debacle is still not over (the software system is still in place) - most of the wrongly penalised sub-postmasters are still out of pocket - I'm not sure I would be leaping to take on the franchise being offered in Lordship Lane.
    • Otherwise in Bellenden Road are brilliant! They’ve made me stage dresses, restructured vintage finds and are working on remodelling my late brothers huntsman tweed suit for my modern husband! Not cheap and rents have meant they are moving premises at mo.
    • Penguin, I broadly agree, except that the Girobank was a genuinely innovative and successful operation. It’s rather ironic that after all these years we are now back to banking at the Post Office due to all the bank branch closures.  I agree that the roots of the problem go back further than 2012 (?), when the PO and RM were separated so RM could be sold. I’m willing to blame Peter Mandelson, Margaret Thatcher or even Keith Joseph. But none of them will be standing for the local council, hoping to make capital out of the possible closure of Lordship Lane PO, as if they are in no way responsible. The Lib Dems can’t be let off the hook that easily.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...