Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You certainly won?t find this helpful, but all I can tell you is that it?s the brutal truth.


Allergens are pretty difficult to handle in general, especially where things like nuts - which can cause life-threatening reactions in incredibly small amounts - are concerned. Awareness has increased massively in the last few years, but what you will usually get from a restaurant is something along the lines of ?Although there is no (insert relevant allergen here) in the recipe, we cannot and will not guarantee that there are no trace elements present on the dish.?


Bluntly it?s a legal thing; as soon as you give a 100% assurance you are legally exposed if any contamination as somehow occurred. What is the point of me explaining all this?


Well, simply put all restaurants these days are - or should be - doing their utmost to limit risk. However, if you?re still concerned go with a bigger name rather than a small place; large chains and famous names will have company policies in place that should be rigorously enforced with the threat of sanctions from head office if they find staff are flaunting them.


You are never going to get a 100% assurance, from anyone, but if it?s peace of mind you?re after, a big pubco , restaurant chain or well-known name is your best course of action. It sounds awful to say, butvthe more they have to lose the more careful they?re going to be.


My suggestion would be one of the Dishoom?s. We took a visiting Australian relative with a dairy intolerance to the Shoreditch branch and they were really helpful, with very clear labelling.

I have an extremely severe death-in-ten-minutes allergy to certain nuts. TBH it is not that huge of an issue - I'm still alive and dine out all the time. I'd recommend Thai Corner, Franklins, and many other local places. I'd say big chains are actually worse than small businesses, as small businesses often have staff that stays longer, and, are more up to speed on ingredients. Just ask and let them know. The begging bowl is probably the restaurant that wins on nut allergy awareness locally. Not locally, St. Leonards is awesome and also has "special measures" in place if you announce an allergy AND is probs the best food in London by miles.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...