Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You certainly won?t find this helpful, but all I can tell you is that it?s the brutal truth.


Allergens are pretty difficult to handle in general, especially where things like nuts - which can cause life-threatening reactions in incredibly small amounts - are concerned. Awareness has increased massively in the last few years, but what you will usually get from a restaurant is something along the lines of ?Although there is no (insert relevant allergen here) in the recipe, we cannot and will not guarantee that there are no trace elements present on the dish.?


Bluntly it?s a legal thing; as soon as you give a 100% assurance you are legally exposed if any contamination as somehow occurred. What is the point of me explaining all this?


Well, simply put all restaurants these days are - or should be - doing their utmost to limit risk. However, if you?re still concerned go with a bigger name rather than a small place; large chains and famous names will have company policies in place that should be rigorously enforced with the threat of sanctions from head office if they find staff are flaunting them.


You are never going to get a 100% assurance, from anyone, but if it?s peace of mind you?re after, a big pubco , restaurant chain or well-known name is your best course of action. It sounds awful to say, butvthe more they have to lose the more careful they?re going to be.


My suggestion would be one of the Dishoom?s. We took a visiting Australian relative with a dairy intolerance to the Shoreditch branch and they were really helpful, with very clear labelling.

I have an extremely severe death-in-ten-minutes allergy to certain nuts. TBH it is not that huge of an issue - I'm still alive and dine out all the time. I'd recommend Thai Corner, Franklins, and many other local places. I'd say big chains are actually worse than small businesses, as small businesses often have staff that stays longer, and, are more up to speed on ingredients. Just ask and let them know. The begging bowl is probably the restaurant that wins on nut allergy awareness locally. Not locally, St. Leonards is awesome and also has "special measures" in place if you announce an allergy AND is probs the best food in London by miles.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...