Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We live on Nunhead side of Peckham Rye and was pleased to hear they're putting in speed bumps to calm the traffic that often hurtles down the hill as we try and cross the road with our baby. However, having seen the first one has now been finished, we're disappointed to see that it's completely flat and is incapable of actually slowing the traffic. I wonder if this is a mistake or intentional due to buses that use the road.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/21239-peckham-rye-speed-bump/
Share on other sites

I also welcome any measure that slows traffic on that side of the common, speeding cars are a real issue along there and it can be quite nervewracking walking along with a child. However, I also drive, and the fact that the pavement has been significantly widened is not made clear to road traffic at all. I am hoping that the work is yet to be completed and there will some signs/reflector strips etc?

It's crazy on a motorcycle because it's designed like the shared use areas (like the bit outside Sloane Square tube) - if that is the one you're talking about. The other bit where you have to hang almost a hairpin bend left now, is - I hope - yet to be finished, because there are double yellow lines out in to the middle of the road so it looks like you're not technically allowed up there yet!


I think I found another main road in SE15 the other day that had yet to have a speed bump in it, but I'm keeping that to myself in case they ruin it and put one in. Traffic calming my arse!

Meanwhile it looks like another 'pinch' point is being built further up the same road, and at the moment traffic lights are being used whilst it is being built. Looks like only one vehicle at most will be able to get through when it is done, but I may be wrong here. Either way, if it is like the one being talked above where the pavement is being widened at a point that means there is less room for cyclists and bikers to safely go through without being hit by cars. However, we'll see.

I spoke to a workman the other day who told me there will be at least a third pinch point and there may well run the length of peckham rye, he wasn't sure. I live on this road and as a cyclist I have had to to swerve out into traffic, naturally checking beforehand that there wasnt anything directly in my line,


I can forsee speeding drivers going just as fast but right down the centre of the road where previously they didn't have to. People that drive like this will continue to do so because they don't give a shit about anyone else and it's fun to scare the living daylights out of oncoming traffic.


I think we will soon see another bunch of flowers tied to a lamp post.

I live on the road and received consultation papers stating that speed bumps were to be installed. I was very pleased as there have been quite a few people hit on the road while trying to cross and we find it quite hairy trying to get across with our pushchair. However, as previously mentioned, these ridiculous additions to the road aren't raised so will have absolutely no effect on calming the traffic. Also, they're making the entire stretch of road double yellow lines and I fear the lack of parked cars acting as obstacles will just speed the traffic up even more. Absolute joke.

Peckham Rose - re the Hairpin left turn to go up towards Nunhead (Stuart Road) - the corner used to be nice and wide, like it is again at the moment, then they built a big curb out into the junction, with the cycle lane, I think to make traffic turn left more slowly, but now cars coming out of Stuart Road turning right are often so far over that you can't actually turn left until they move! Another bit of inspired traffic calming.


Anyway, they only changed that junction so the buses could turn up there whilst there was diversion due to Cheltenham Road being resurfaced, they will be putting the raised curb/island type thing back in again soon (I know because I asked the workmen in the hopes they were doing away with it for good), which is why they haven't taken away the yellow lines that are now strangely in the middle of the road.


Hope this helps explain things.

I can't be arsed to file a FOI request!


Is it necessary to file an FOI request. Isn't this information in the public domain?


Have you made FOI requests before. I need to make one myself and would welcome advice on how it should/must be worded. Please advise me if you know. Thanks

In my opinion, the rationale behind the new yellow lines is flawed as cars will now go faster down this stretch of road with no parked cars or speed bumps to slow them down.


Regarding the speed bumps, I had a word with a nice chap from the council who was inspecting the work last week. Apparently, these pinch points are the preferred method of traffic calming nowadays because they're less noisy for residents. However, since the road is quite wide, even in the so called pinch points, they don't have any effect at slowing the traffic.


A simple pedestrian crossing near Solomans' Passage would have gone a long way to make things safer for pedestrians.


Massive waste of money I say. Shame, because as a tax payer and a resident I'd have no issue if the results were actually fit for purpose.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think it's connected with the totem pole renovation celebrations They have passed now, but the notice has been there since then (at least that's when I first saw it - I passed it on the 484 and also took a photo!)
    • Labour was damned, no matter what it did, when it came to the budget. It loves go on about the black hole, but if Labour had had its way, we'd have been in lockdown for longer and the black hole would be even bigger.  Am I only the one who thinks it's time the NHS became revenue-generating? Not private, but charging small fees for GP appts, x-rays etc? People who don't turn up for GP and out-patient appointments should definitely be charged a cancellation fee. When I lived in Norway I got incredible medical treatment, including follow up appointments, drugs, x-rays, all for £200. I was more than happy to pay it and could afford to. For fairness, make it somehow means-tested.  I am sure there's a model in there somewhere that would be fair to everyone. It's time we stopped fetishising something that no longer works for patient or doctor.  As for major growth, it's a thing of the past, no matter where in the world you live, unless it's China. Or unless you want a Truss-style, totally de-regulated economy and love capitalism with a large C. 
    • If you read my post I expect a compromise with the raising of the cap on agricultural property so that far less 'ordinary' farmers do not get caught  Clarkson is simply a high profile land owner who is not in the business as a conventional farmer.  Here's a nice article that seems to explain things well  https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/nov24-farming-budget-inheritance-tax-apr/ It's too early to speculate on 2029.  I expect that most of us who were pleased that Labour got in were not expecting anything radical. Whilst floating the idea of hitting those looking to minimise inheritance tax, including gifting, like fuel duty they also chickened put. I'm surprised that anyone could start touting for the Tories after 14 years of financial mismanagement and general incompetence. Surly not.  A very low bar for Labour but they must be well aware that there doesn't need to be much of a swing form Reform to overturn Labour's artificially large majority.  But even with a generally rabid right wing press, now was the opportunity to be much braver.
    • And I worry this Labour government with all of it's own goals and the tax increases is playing into Farage's hands. With Trump winning in the US, his BFF Farage is likely to benefit from strained relations between the US administration and the UK one. As Alastair Campbell said on a recent episode of The Rest is Politics who would not have wanted to be a fly on the wall of the first call between Angela Rayner and JD Vance....those two really are oil and water. Scary, scary times right now and there seems to be a lack of leadership and political nous within the government at a time when we really need it - there aren't many in the cabinet who you think will play well on the global stage.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...