Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I use Soundcloud.


You upload your crappy track. Then people add comments to it like "cool bass drum!" and "I'm feelin' it!!" at points of their choosing as the track plays. And they they become your soundcloud follower and then you become theirs and then you get to listen to their crappy track and add comments like "great hi-hat" and "this is gonna SMASH IT" and then nothing whatsoever happens because - let's face it - you're just a load of people playing each other your crappy tracks in the dream that someone, somewhere with a massive cigar will call you, offer a $1000000000000 recording contract and free blowjobs for life.


Happily, I'm not the above, of course. All my tracks are private: Soundcloud is a useful and inexpensive means for me to collate and send work clients, for them to preview the work and then download the music to the edit.


I think this is the point about all these types of thing. Most people will look at them and think "that's shit, why would anyone want to do that?" but there will always be a percentage who get real value put of it. To me, LinkedIn, for example - is utterly pointless ("John added overhead projectors to his list of skills") but to certain people - apparently - like people in certain types of recruitment - it's actually invaluable.

Linked in is simply a mechanism for me to be refused jobs because I joined before all this sort of stuff was acceptable, put up something flippant about myself, lost my login and without my signtory email address am unable to do anything about it, and thanks to a total lack of customer service and an inability to delete an account am scuppered.


Soudcloud lets me listen to some songs for free without having to click 'skip this ad'.

Don't really get the comments on the histogram thing, bit weird.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...