rendelharris defamation

[Steve32]

Just going to put this out there - is anyone else uneasy about rendelharris being allowed to keep putting out his defamations on the ED thread, starting entire threads on individuals who he has never even met? His case seems entirely baseless (since he did not personally witness any incident), and he has ludicrously accused me of sending him and several other people threatening PM's (again, without evidence). One does not feel this is a good precedent.

[Blah Blah]

In a word no I am not uneasy! If you insist on repeatedly using a public forum to try and criminalise a dog walker and her husband, when the Police have clearly told you there is no actionable offence then you deserve the response you get.

And to add that he is not guilty of defamation for anything he has written as far as I can see. Referring to private conversations with you that actually do exist, is not defamation by the way, nor is it slander.

[peckham_ryu]

Nope. Actually it?s gripping, like a cocker spaniel?s bite ;)

[Michael Palaeologus]

"and he has ludicrously accused me of sending him and several other people threatening PM's (again, without evidence"

Did you or did you not send such PMs'? You do not specifically deny the charge, just that no evidence has been presented.