Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm not Admin, but please do not waste the non-urgent police line's time. This is a civil matter not a police matter, unless you believe that the item was stolen. Private buyers of second hand items have fewer rights as opposed to buying something from a retailer. THe CAB has a consumer helpline: https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/consumer/get-more-help/if-you-need-more-help-about-a-consumer-issue/


You can also look at this helpful guide (last updated in Sep 2018) - https://www.saga.co.uk/magazine/money/spending/consumer-rights/what-are-your-rights-when-buying-second-hand-goods

101 is for crimes that do not require an emergency response. It's not for vendor/buyer disputes. IlonaM is quite right, don't waste police time on commercial issues, they've got rather more important stuff to deal with.


ETA Actually find it unbelievable that - from the evidence of your other posts - you're trying to involve the police because you're unhappy with the quality of a dining table you've bought! Pack it in.

You should know that you have a responsibility to inspect items before you hand over money. The seller said the chairs weren't in good repair and the table was scratched so you should have checked carefully first.


I hope you told the police that the seller had actually pre-warned you but you ignored it

GREECE Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jules and boo

> Rendall Harris

>

> Actually I showed my texts and the sellers texts

> and they still said I have a case

> Silly meandsilly police

> I'm sure you know better


Mad as a box of frogs. I know people who work in the police service, trust me they are not interested in your dining table.

Greece, if you can demonstrate there were faults that were not highlighted and that with the recommended repairs that the goods were not fit for purpose, you may well have a case for the small claims court. I do feel your pain and do wish you well in resolving this. One would hope that there was an element of goodwill on behalf of regular and long term forum members.
  • 3 months later...

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Still can't quite believe that someone went to buy

> a table and chairs, looked at them, bought them,

> took them home, then decided they weren't up to

> what they'd been told and called the police.

> Called the police. Sorry, that is utterly bonkers.



Great thread ☝️😃

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

I know people who work in

> the police service, trust me they are not

> interested in your dining table.



:)) :)) :))


Just reading this thread again, that has really cheered me up after a shit few days :)) :)) :))

Civil not criminal law. Google your problem and plenty of advice about how to proceed. Only ring 101 when I am desperate and they take yonks to answer so I wouldn't waste their time. Write a letter, letters are great in this situation and tend to get more of a response than texts and e-mails. Trading Standards probably wont have resources to help (or even respond) and will generally refer you to the CAB. Ultimately Small Claims Court. Not a police matter unless there is harassment, threats, physical harm. But thanks for the distraction from Brexit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...