Jump to content

Idle cricket musing

Peckhamgatecrasher

By Peckhamgatecrasher
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> maxxi Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I don't think it's a bad thing - good to see

> England face a very good side instead of knocking

> > over teams by an innings plus (too easy and not

> tremendous fun after the first couple of times -

> > unless it's Australia natch.)

>

> Since you've been walloped by Pakistan and held by

> the Sri Lankans so far this year, I should imagine

> that feeling has long since gone...



Yes, the spin-debacle in Dubai was a reminder that they (England) couldn't deal with the turning ball - something that got better against Sri Lanka and will be properly tested against India in the winter.


But there was still a feeling that at home England were nearly unbeatable and to see them beaten by a good team - rather than by a suicidal collapse in form - is a good thing and made for good test cricket. Tbh I didn't expect England to still be batting after lunch and in the past they wouldn't have been - I think England have got better in every game.

Brendan

Brendan

Posted
Posted

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Brendan Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Of course SA is the better team. What next,

> insightful observations about the wetness of

> > water?

>

> Of course, the other thing about water is that you

> can choke on it. Quite often.


Only if you try to drink it all in one day. And we all know that's not propper drinking.

  • 2 weeks later...
david_carnell

david_carnell

Posted
Posted

There's an argument that Vaughn capitalised on Hussein's good ground work. And I think he had a better set of players to work with than Strauss has had.


And to say "right place, right time" for someone who won Ashes home and away seems harsh.


Great win ratio.


Lacking in batting towards the end, but chose to fall on his sword than be dropped. A wise and generous move.

Atticus

Atticus

Posted
Posted

Back to back Ashes = great captain.

He took over when England where in absolute mess following KP/Moores debacle (thrashed by West Indies). 5th in world rankings

We beat SA away, wiped the floor with India (who were ranked top of the world).

He then lead team to the top of the world rankings.

Loz

Loz

Posted
Posted

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There's an argument that Vaughn capitalised on Hussein's good ground work. And I think he had a

> better set of players to work with than Strauss has had.


But, as an Aussie, I would say that the difference in the teams in the 2005 series was Michael Vaughan's captaincy. He out-thought Ponting every game.


> And to say "right place, right time" for someone who won Ashes home and away seems harsh.


Not at all. Results are really the measure of a team. After all, Ponting captained Australia to a record-equalling 16 test matches in a row and had a win/loss ration of 3.00 (compared with Strauss's 2.18). He is - by results - Australia's most successful captain ever.


But he wasn't a shrewd tactician. He wasn't a captain that turned games through his decision making.


And neither was Strauss. He seemed happy to sit back rather than take a game to the opposition. More so, even, than Ponting. Both were successful captains - neither were great captains.


It will be interesting to see how Cook goes. Clarke has been a revelation as Aussie captain - he has surprised me as to how good he is. Time will tell if Cook grabs the opportunity in the same way.

  • 2 weeks later...
Loz

Loz

Posted
Posted

It's a variation on the 'Dilscoop', though Dilshan's idea was to flick it over the keeper's head. It's illegal to station a fielder behind the keeper, so Dilshan figured that was probably the best place to hit the ball!


Buttler is known to play this shot, so there should have been a fine leg in place. The Saffers hadn't done their homework. Amazing hitting though.

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Morgan is class (at the shorter forms, anyway),

> but Buttler? We'll see - one swallow does not a

> summer make. I wouldn't get your hopes up based

> on what was essentially 8 balls.



You may be right and yes two of them were free hits but we're not talking test cricket so the ability to make 8 balls count is exactly what is needed.


Given the relative failure of Lumb, Wright and Morgan and the fact that the pressure was well and truly on at the time (only 11 overs) I am looking forward to seeing him in the 20/20 finals. (When England won it last time they had a similarly cobbled-together last-minute looking kind of a side so maybe it's a good omen?)

  • 2 months later...
Peckhamgatecrasher

Peckhamgatecrasher

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Insomnia has some advantages.


Anyone else not particularly enthralled by this series? I just can't get in the mood, though it sounds as though the paying public are having a rather good party.


"It's hot, a cloudless sky, hazy blue ..." What a contrast to the foggy, foggy dew outside.

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

Ridiculous decision not to play Monty - agree with Boycs that if he wasn't going to play here he may as well have stayed at home.


Compton's technique let him down and sounds like Trott let the pressure get to him - oh, and of course Anderson shouldn't have been put in on a turning wicket that early. If the rest concentrate though (are you listening KP?) I can still see this ending as a draw.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Penguin68
      Lordship Lane Post Office Closure

      By Penguin68 · Posted

      Cheques are still the safest way to send money to others if you want to make a 'thing' of it. At Christmas or birthdays a card with a cheque is the most effective present to distant god children or extended family, for instance when you don't know what they have or need - made out to the parent if you don't think they have an account yet. Of course you can use electronic transfer, often, to parents if you set it up, but that doesn't quite have the impact of a cheque in the post. So a cheque still has a use, I believe, even when you have very much reduced your cheque writing for other purposes.
    • Moovart
      Had to take a second look!

      By Moovart · Posted

      I believe "Dulwich" is deemed where Dulwich library is situated so left at Peckham rye and straight up Barry Road
    • Azalea
      Laundrette on grove vale

      By Azalea · Posted

      The solution for the cost of duvet washing is for each person to have their own single duvet like in Scandinavia.  Then you can wash the duvet in your own washing machine. Get a heated drying rack if you don’t have a tumble dryer.          
    • Sue
      Had to take a second look!

      By Sue · Posted

      Depends which route you take!

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...