Jump to content

Recommended Posts

DulwichDeviant Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Boris is to blame in my view.

>

> BRING BACK KEN.....


xxxxx


Yeh I sort of warmed towards Boris because he's such a total idiot you've got to respect him for having the chutzpah to even stand for mayor, and I can't stand Ken's nasal voice, but hey of the two I agree, BRING BACK KEN :)


Plus he likes newts, so that's a - er - plus .......

  • 1 month later...

I will raise this route again, it appears the smaller buses (484, P13 and P12)are those that are running with the worst service in this area. The 484 and 343 are currently on diversion in Nunhead, this may be adding to the delays. Do any users experience 484s being terminated prematurely? Following many complaints, I had a meeting with Val Shawcross, TFL and Go Ahead who run the P12 and 63. Both these routes had problems linked to roadworks with resultant delays and the company responding by frequently turning buses round to stick to their timetable in the centre of the routes. As TFL is answerable to the Boris and he does not seem to be interested to improve bus services in South London (hence the negative response to our request to extend the 63 to Honor Oak Park Station), it's really hard to get anything done (eg more frequent buses)! There is now one extra bus running on the P12 route to help counteract the delays and reduce the likelihood that buses are turned round.

Renata

Last year when I had a gripe about the poor frequency of the 484, it was blamed on the roadworks in Camberwell. The 484 has managed to consistently maintain its erratic status since then, roadworks or not. I can't see the current diversion up Kelvington and along Brenchley causing any delay, certainly haven't noticed any delay to the 343. Can't ever recall being decanted off a 484 early, though it's an occasional hazard of the 343 especially at Elephant.


An additional observation: The 484 route could do with additional buses (perhaps at key times) as it's frequently full to capacity by the time it gets to the stop opp. Kings when heading towards Lewisham, and at the stop by Peacocks in Lewisham heading back towards Camberwell. Both these stops are virtually start of route.

The 63 quite often seems to change destination to Peckham Library or Peckham Rye part way through a journey in the evening (and I'm not talking late evening - maybe 7-7.30 ish). Also seems to be prone to run with large gaps in service even early in the evening (like a 20 minute wait at 6.30 in the evening).


I've been using this route for a good couple of years and the service has definitely gone downhill in recent months.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Has anyone had any joy getting refunds for their cancelled kids' swimming lessons? I am constantly just getting a 'computer says no' response from Dulwich Leisure - quite how they think its okay to charge £42.40 per child without a service being given is beyond me! I will try emailing Portia too...
    • Just to clarify, this isn't the same cherry as last year, it's in the corner by the path that runs down to the crossroads of FHR / Colyton / Dunstans. It hasn't been an issue previously because the perimeter wasn't as large... I'm sure it must have been noticed & flagged during the various planning meetings, walkabouts etc and there is an ecological resolution planned that will avoid any damage to the tree. After all, Gala pride themselves on their environmental stance, being "nestled in the park" and everything... 🤦
    • Those branches are going to get chopped...again. All of this shows the central paradox at the heart of Southwark's greening the streets policy. What is the good of planting trees in tarmac if you are simultaneously wrecking large sections of the park and stopping locals using the park? It just does not make sense. Cllr Catherine Rose should be made to answer for Gala conduct, if they are already flouting the terms of their agreement.
    • All, I have had bad experiences with scaffolders in the past. They have a hard job and sometimes damage your house by accident. The way they deal with it after this is usually what remains in their customers' minds...... and I have used a few different companies across last 12 years as a customer. I don't know if it is an exception, but I found LDS scaffolding's guys really good: Discrete, focused and on time. Their comms was ok. I have made sure I saved their contacts and will use them again. Prices felt fair. LEE GORE 07931642467  DEAN PRICE 07940531370  Olivier
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...