Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I spotted the block of four two bedroom flats on Underhill road / Overhill Road junction are back on the market..... at wait for it 369k !!!!!!!


So after not selling these flats for around seven years and squatters move in they kick the sqautters out put a lick of paint on them and try and sell them for 50k more than the last time they tried (I last saw them for 317k).


The main problem with these flats is apart from not being like the rest of the road at all is the bedrooms. You can see into them when you walk past which is not great but they are small and a strange shape and it looks impossible to try and fit a wardrobe and a double bed in the room becasue of this.


The living room / kitchen area actually looks quite nice but trying to sell of the very top end for a two bed flat with its major donwfalls is a touch ambtious.


These have to be an example of the woerst desgined flats I have seen !!!!

That's how capitalism works, they can easily reduce the price, but can't easily increase it :). Do you think the trouserless guy had some deal though that took the price actually paid down.



If not, No wonder he can't afford curtains yet



AD Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I spotted the block of four two bedroom flats on

> Underhill road / Overhill Road junction are back

> on the market..... at wait for it 369k !!!!!!!

>

> So after not selling these flats for around seven

> years and squatters move in they kick the

> sqautters out put a lick of paint on them and try

> and sell them for 50k more than the last time they

> tried (I last saw them for 317k).

>

> The main problem with these flats is apart from

> not being like the rest of the road at all is the

> bedrooms. You can see into them when you walk past

> which is not great but they are small and a

> strange shape and it looks impossible to try and

> fit a wardrobe and a double bed in the room

> becasue of this.

>

> The living room / kitchen area actually looks

> quite nice but trying to sell of the very top end

> for a two bed flat with its major donwfalls is a

> touch ambtious.

>

> These have to be an example of the woerst desgined

> flats I have seen !!!!

But don't forget, they have put some kind-of curtain things in so now they're completely private!! I noticed that price and couldn't believe it either - the top two, with private balconies, a lovely view (I imagine) and not easily looked into maybe, but the bottom two...
I don't believe that modern buildings should fit the area style-wise, but this looks like it was made up as they went along, and it all went a bit wonky. They look reasonably spacious, but the huge windows mean that you'll spend your life with the blinds shut.

I think the whole building has been up for sale within 2011, certainly for under ?1M... perhaps around the 900 mark?


Personally I quite like a bit of contemporary architecture, and it can only be a good thing if they are going to finally be occupied, at whatever they go for. And I bet they are lovely and light with all those windows...

They're hideous looking....the builders have been here for the last month constructing some out-building storage space, and laying a lawn....still looks grim.


I met a lovely couple a while back who had moved in (the only one to have done so) but whether they're still there or not I don;t know. And you don;t have to be on the P13 to see into the bedroom from Underhill Road. What were they thinking?


As far as parking goes, you park on the street!!

London is dotted all over with similar monuments to 2006 era property greed. The promise that you too can live a luxury lifestyle in a new build. With a girl in a bikini drinking fresh coffee on the balcony. Except it overlooks the Walworth Road and the plants on the terrace are already browning from the exhaust fumes.


The developers only have themselves to blame.

I for one am feeling a tad sympathetic to the "developers" who are selling it now - this post surely ain't gonna help.


I'd be pretty narked if entirely negative points about a property I was selling (and I mean the seeing-in and aesthetics, not the price) became the subject of a thread on a local forum. Potential purchasers would obviously be aware of any shortcomings the property may have and would make offers accordingly, but this kind of public discussion could sway decision making a lot more than perhaps is fair.

You can compare with recent prices achieved in the area (I get these emailed to me - link is at the bottom of the post if anybody else is interested):



"Sales recently added within 500m of (my postcode)


Flat 1, 69 Silvester Road ?232,000

London, SE22 9PF 21st October 2011


180b Underhill Road ?295,000

London, SE22 0QH 21st October 2011


142 Melbourne Grove ?645,000

London, SE22 8SA 20th October 2011


36 Whateley Road ?710,000

London, SE22 9DD 14th October 2011


68a Crawthew Grove ?235,000

London, SE22 9AB 11th October 2011


27a Ashbourne Grove ?299,950

London, SE22 8RN 30th September 2011


87a - 87b Lordship Lane ?269,000

London, SE22 8EP 29th September 2011


6 Matham Grove ?700,000

London, SE22 8PN 29th September 2011


16 Worlingham Road ?565,300

London, SE22 9HD 27th September 2011


169 Landells Road ?428,250

East Dulwich, SE22 9PN 23rd September 2011


You can search all these sales totally free of charge by going to OurProperty.co.uk.


By default, every month we will notify you of new sales within 500 metres of your home postcode, but you can also watch up to 10 further areas of your choice. To do so, simply visit your custom alerts page and log in."


ETA: Obviously I don't know how the size, location etc of each of the above compares, but if you are interested I'm sure you can easily find out. One of them is in Underhill Road.

  • 2 weeks later...

stephen509 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think these kind of figures are misleading as

> every property is different.

>

> We know these flats didn't sell before and nothing

> has been changed to them.


FYI they have been completely refurbished to an extremely good standard, and restructured within to make a better layout

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No and Wes Streeting is heading in this direction because he knows the NHS is broken and was never built to cope with the demands currently being placed on it. A paid-for approach in some shape or form, and massive reforms, is the only way the NHS can survive - neither of which the left or unions will be pleased about.  
    • Labour talks about, and hopefully will do something about, the determinants of poor health.  They're picked up the early Sunak policy on smoking and vapes.  Let's see how far they tackle obesity and inactivity. I'd rather the money was spent on these any other interventions eg mental health, social care and SEN, rather than seeing the NHS as income generating.
    • I think it's connected with the totem pole renovation celebrations They have passed now, but the notice has been there since then (at least that's when I first saw it - I passed it on the 484 and also took a photo!)
    • Labour was damned, no matter what it did, when it came to the budget. It loves go on about the black hole, but if Labour had had its way, we'd have been in lockdown for longer and the black hole would be even bigger.  Am I only the one who thinks it's time the NHS became revenue-generating? Not private, but charging small fees for GP appts, x-rays etc? People who don't turn up for GP and out-patient appointments should definitely be charged a cancellation fee. When I lived in Norway I got incredible medical treatment, including follow up appointments, drugs, x-rays, all for £200. I was more than happy to pay it and could afford to. For fairness, make it somehow means-tested.  I am sure there's a model in there somewhere that would be fair to everyone. It's time we stopped fetishising something that no longer works for patient or doctor.  As for major growth, it's a thing of the past, no matter where in the world you live, unless it's China. Or unless you want a Truss-style, totally de-regulated economy and love capitalism with a large C. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...