Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This text is shaping up to be the earliest authenticated historical reference to East Dulwich.


John K


Bermondsey Abbey Chronicle SA 1245


Et hoc anno facta est concordia inter priorem de Bermundeseye et priorissam de Halywell, de decimis in Est Dilewiche, scilicet quod dicti prior et conventus de Bermundeseye percipient omnes decimas maiores provenientes de terris, quas de bosco vel de pastura in agriculturam dicte moniales converterint in parochia de Cambyrwelle

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20749-when-was-east-dulwich-1245-ad/
Share on other sites

Google translate says;


And this year there was a harmony between the first and of the prioress of Bermundeseye Halywell, is by the tithes in the Dilewiche, namely, that the said prior and receive all the tithes of the major meetings concerning Bermundeseye arising out of the countries, of which the wood or in the pasture of the said nuns turn agriculture in the parish of Cambyrwelle

Putting some basic Latin knowledge and some human thought alongside the translation, I'd go for


And in this year there was an agreement between the prior of Bermondsey and the Prioress of Halywell about the tithes in East Dulwich. That the Prior and convent of Bermondsey will receive all the tithes arising out of the woods, pasture and the nuns' agricultural labour in the parish of Camberwell.

Are there any forumites as old as I am who took part in the Dilwihs/Dulwich millenium parade in 1967? I was riding on the back of a float proudly wearing my Brownie uniform and waving a homemade Union Jack if I remember correctly!! Can't remember the whole parade route but I know we went through Dulwich Park.

major or greater tithe (wheat, etc) as opposed to minor (eg, hazlenuts).


Yes, it's worth remembering that we are not talking about a money economy here - hence tithe barns being places where the tithe (in produce) was stored.


It's also worth remebering that at this time Anglo-Saxon (actually by now Middle English) words were being included in Latin texts. Legal texts mix French with English as well ('il jecte un graund brickbat' being quite a famous one). Hence 'Est' for East (as opposed to 'it is') is quite possible.


Google translate works in classical latin - medieval latin (which anyway often has local variants) is beyond it. The 50 year old Revised Medieval Word List I have confirms Decima Maior as 'great tithe'.

jim_the_chin and Penguin68:


"East" for "Est" is secure.


The clincher is the 1820 Charity Commissioners' report on Battersea Parish.


GSJ57:


I was there. The parade ended in Belair Park. The tableaux were done lakeside.


It's taken me nearly 50 years to realise that Bill Darby, my one time latin master, was having a huge joke on the people of Dulwich Village.


John K

Janet Nelson has kindly provided an accurate translation.


Her credentials for this are here.


John K




In this year an agreement was made between the Prior of Bermondsey and the Prioress of Holywell concerning the tithes in East Dulwich, namely, that the said prior and community of Bermondsey should take all the greater tithes coming from the lands which the said nuns had converted from woodland or pasture into ploughed land in the parish of Camberwell.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...