Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In case you've missed the lamppost poster, please see below link to consultation on the planning website. Location is the garden behind 68 East Dulwich Grove (corner of Melbourne Grove northern section). Consultation end 25th October.


Worth noting the site already has permission granted for a smaller 2 bed property.


https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=_STHWR_DCAPR_9578377

Not sure why anyone would object to this other than a neighbour who doesn't want construction going on, or worried they will lose some privacy. But really building a house on a plot that is big enough, on a residential street, in an area that needs more housing seems like it's going to get waved through.

I've been wondering what was going on there with the makeshift gate to the back garden. I see the owner is also having to apply for a certificate of lawfulness for the existing house, to use as a house of multiple occupation. IMO that place is an eyesore, and the hedge needs cutting back.

I would have thought that this new house - with inbuilt garage - would have impacted on the right to light for the houses next door. The design isn't going to win any awards - it looks pretty dull to me.

Would be nice if it blended in with the existing houses. It's rather garish.


You could even make a small access road down the right of it so the other two houses behind it could build on their gardens too - they might want to at a later date. This is removing any opportunity for them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The Plough has very good traditional food...
    • Yes I got an email from Ellie Reeves local MP today, saying Lordship Lane post office will stay but become a franchise. So good news for those who still use post offices!
    • Many are enduring the cost of living crisis. Whilst I feel for single people living alone, the point is many families also feel squeezed financially so you saying it's fairer for larger households to pay more for water consumption is a bit mean spirited. There are many many situations people find themselves in and one could also argue that single people living alone in 3 bedroom houses are disadvantaging families by taking up more space than needed. The discussion could go right down a rabbit hole. The basic point is water should be free. It was until privatisation and now it feels like yet another tax on working families.  I'm using the term hardworking families because we've been hard hit by many increasing bills. That isn't to take away from single people or those without kids. Obviously everything (well most things) are choices. Everyone is entitled to free speech last time I checked. Why does the term hardworking families bother you so much?! Jeez...
    • I've not had any success over the last three years.  Repositioning it this year.  I heard of some twitchers homing in on a nest as they could hear a swift, only to find out that it was a recording which attempts to lure swifts in.  We only have a small number above Horniman Gardens.  I've seen them close to ground in Sydenham and Clapham  I think half the issue is disruption in and from their wintering grounds where there are less favourable conditions than in years gone past.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...