Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It looks like Southwark are already working on the project so it will probably go ahead. Somebody else on the forum has put up a post about garages on Henslowe Road recently being earmarked too. A good thing for new social housing to be built but if Lendlease are anything to do with it then that's why it's probably going to be 50% available at social housing rent.

It?s worth finding out, if you can, if the developer has a clause which allows them to sell/rent at ?market value? if the project goes on too long.


The development behind the flats on Wood Vale got shafted exactly like this; the builders had the right to jack the selling price up if construction went on too long in order to ?recoup their costs? (I kid you not). Can you guess what happened...?


Too often developers promise social housing and then find a way to weasel out of it.

I get the impression that by "local" they mean very immediate area and the rest will go to Southwark residents - that's what the Housing Plan says anyway.


JoeLeg - absolutely, we only need to look at the disgrace of the Heygate development to see how developers (aided, abetted and even funded by our own dear council) can get away with murder between planning permission and reality.

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It?s worth finding out, if you can, if the

> developer has a clause which allows them to

> sell/rent at ?market value? if the project goes on

> too long.

>

> The development behind the flats on Wood Vale got

> shafted exactly like this; the builders had the

> right to jack the selling price up if construction

> went on too long in order to ?recoup their costs?

> (I kid you not). Can you guess what happened...?

>

> Too often developers promise social housing and

> then find a way to weasel out of it.


Not sure what you mean JoeLeg as the developer in this case is Southwark Council?

Passiflora Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Not sure what you mean JoeLeg as the developer in

> this case is Southwark Council?


I'm very willing to stand corrected but I assume (as SC don't have a massive cohort of workers ready to run up buildings) this will be "in partnership" with a private developer?

Passiflora Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Not sure what you mean JoeLeg as the developer in

> this case is Southwark Council?


I?m not sure it makes a difference these days. The lure of market value rents is strong, and Southwarks housing dept filled with some of the nastiest specimens you could want to avoid, so no, I?m not sure it will make a difference though I hope I?m wrong.

For clarity I proposed this site along with Henslowe Road garages.

The homes are to be Southwark council homes and by 50% local let they mean people in housing need in the Dulwich are and the reminder for the general Southwark council housing waiting list. Their is no sinister plot here.

I've not yet seen the detailed design but would hope it is in keeping with Create Streets guidelines to maximise how acceptable they could possible be - https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjcuPrhzY_eAhXLDMAKHfR7CccQFjAAegQIChAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipsos.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fmigrations%2Fen-uk%2Ffiles%2FAssets%2FDocs%2FPolls%2Fhousing-home-types-survey-create-streets-slides.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3fFPZpRKR9qe8lZw08ULawThis leave one plot on Underhill road that the council has yet to bring plans forward for - where the 4 prefab homes were/are.

Hi Yes went to meeting. Im a garage renter and seems waste of time to keep garages as there was no one

from garage department to talk about 14 garages.

Has any body at the council thought of the use of garages in the first place, to make secure parking of vehicles

in Southwark. All I have to say is 14 renters for 4 houses, Well for the meeting you know which way which it will go.I was on the waiting list for two years, when we have to leave will the council treat us the same as council

tenants and offer a garage in the area as we have no home to go to for our vehicle??????????????????

It all seemed rather ill conceived, displace 14 existing southwark tenants for 4 (appreciate homes are important), no idea of overall cost of development, no idea of materials to be used, no opinion on viability.


Massing seems too much in comparison the existing residential vernacular. Also noise from the Church would need to be considered.


As per garages2018 post above, very annoying not to have any representative from garage department, and in fact a lot of queries were answered with "I don't know its not my department'


Indicated planning application poss. in March 2019 which would follow 2 further consultations.


Would add that consultation time ending at 19.00 doesn't really help those traveling home from work, and consultation questionnaire is very limited in terms of responses you are allowed to tick. 'Limited consultation' would be a better description.

There is a shortage of garages and this is anther one to go even if there was a meeting.

Im one of those renters and when I went to meeting it seemed that it was only the residents of the houses around the

site that they wanted to turn up and not the garage renters. We had our say but you know the outcome, as the council member was there and the developers showing planes. BUT no one from the council garage department

To follow up your aside, Jimbo, the garages in Henslowe Road, and probably also your former playground, have a big sign "NO BALL GAMES". I think that is really sad, what harm could be done to a row of garages. Who in the Council takes those decisions to prohibit children from engaging in such positive activities?

jimbo1964 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just as an aside, when I was at St John's and St

> Clement's in the 70's I spent two years at the

> Epiphany Hall and those garages were our

> playground.


Me too, in the early 80?s, but that all stopped after a game of football went wrong and kid got a nail driven (flat end first) about a quarter of an inch into his forehead. That?s when they started sending us back to the main school for playtime!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Walking last Friday early evening anywhere near where the bottom end of Lordship Lane meets the Goose Green roundabout, one would have been directly confronted - as I was - with this scene: Outside the East Dulwich Tavern an impenetrable phalanx of pushing yobs, shouty louts and selfish yahoos pressed outward from the open doors of this establishment, past the curtilage (the land in front of and owned by the business), all across the public right of way, to the kerbside. This was the situation all the way along, end to end. I watched as passersby, old people, children, parents with buggies, people just going about their business, were forced by these booze-sucking bellowing scumbags onto the road - where, at that hour, traffic rushed endlessly off the roundabout. We have, I realised, somehow become so used to this revolting spectacles as to believe it to be inevitable. It is not. This is why I'm dropping this post. Enough really is enough. This roiling boozy blockade represents a total failure by all the responsible authorities - the licencing authority, for example - but most of all (yet once more, again, as ever), by Southwark Council. Two very different comparisons to give you some perspective: 1. The Kings Head pub on the corner of Albermarle and Stafford Streets, London SW1. Here too, patrons like to drink and chat outside on a warm evening - why should they not. But here, on the latter side a line marks the curtilage on the pavement. Drinkers remain, respectfully, in good order, within the line, watched, quietly and carefully, by a security guard. I wager good money this arrangement is a condition of this pub's licence. 2. The Blue Brick is a cafe in the quiet backstreets of East Dulwich, on the corners of Fellbrigg and Shawbury Roads. Until a few months ago, about half its covers were tables out on the pavement. They bothered nobody. Oh! But they extended all of several centimetres too far into the footpath, so into fearless action swang Southwark Council officers - and now these tables are gone. Result, eh? "Well you see," some wiseacre said to me, "There needs to be a complaint." Not actually true, but for sure this is all too often how local authorities get pushed to do what they should be doing. Hard to think why a complaint trumps, say (and god forbid!) a child being injured on the road. In which circumstance, of course!, Southwark would swing into noisy, virtue-signalling, belated action. But in any case let this post be considered a big, very definite COMPLAINT about this prolonged abuse of our public right of way. I invite readers who agree with me to add their voices. Oh, and all those wee local ward councillors might get off their chufties, defy their party managers, and actually help sort this scandal out. Thanks for reading, Lee Scoresby
    • Hi there, I saw that Google lists the park opening time as 7:30am, but I was wondering if it might actually open earlier than that - maybe anyone who’s out running early or passing by has noticed?  
    • We are thrilled to announce that Little Stars Creche in Dulwich will be opening its doors on 28th April and we would love to invite you and your little ones to an open day where you can meet our team and visit our wonderful setting.  Little Stars is a fun creative space for children aged 2 to 4 years to enjoy whilst parents and carers get some well needed time to catch up on life! We are so excited to bring this much-needed service to the community, and we want to thank all the wonderful parents and carers for participating in our recent survey. Your feedback was invaluable in shaping Little Stars and ensuring it meets the needs of local families. For full information about Little Stars and a detailed schedule please visit our webpage here: Little Stars Crèche We can’t wait to meet you and your little stars soon!
    • Avoid any 2nd hand vehicle with the Ford petrol 1.0 Ecoboost engine and the Petrol 1.2 PureTech engine that can be found in Peugeot, Citroen, Vauxhall.... (you need to mention price for advice)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...