Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Tarot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fair enogh Jeremy I just found Ottas view

> offensive and narrow.

> People are quick to become offensive when seanjack

> passes his usual ,,self righteus opinions about

> me.

> Maybe he knows me!! maybe he dont.but he is

> obsessive.

> There are individuals who have had bad. dealings

> with the D,M.C,that cannot be discussed on an open

> forum.

> The incident with the phone call did happen,at the

> time I went to the reception and complained and it

> was stopped.

> Because its an open forum some people will not

> come on it and give their accounts of dealings

> with the D,M.C,for fear of

> comebacks or worse the no it alls on here.,or the

> fasnatical p.c crowd who think everyones as an

> agenda.


So basically, once your overt comments are shown to be twaddle you revert to "There's more I could tell you about what un-mentionable experiences un-named people have had who are scared to tell anyone except me but trust me, they really happened"? And presumably they are happy to tell you (swearing you to secrecy in the process) because you have proven your patient advocate credentials by single handedly changing the telephone practices of DMC with one well-timed and carefully aimed complaint?

Damian H Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> So basically, once your overt comments are shown

> to be twaddle you revert to "There's more I could

> tell you about what un-mentionable experiences

> un-named people have had who are scared to tell

> anyone except me but trust me, they really

> happened"? And presumably they are happy to tell

> you (swearing you to secrecy in the process)

> because you have proven your patient advocate

> credentials by single handedly changing the

> telephone practices of DMC with one well-timed and

> carefully aimed complaint?


xxxxxxxxx


Well said!

  • 5 weeks later...

I saw Dr Gupta just last week.


I didn't ask for a particular GP, he just happened to be the GP I saw when I went.


Starryeyes, what on earth are you talking about, "weeks of trying to get an appointment"?


You can almost always get an appointment at DMC the same day if you go first thing in the morning. And if you can't get there first thing, you can certainly get an appointment quite soon.

Pickle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Agree with Sue - if I need an appointment for

> myself or the kids I ring first thing in the

> morning and have always been seen the same day.

> For non urgent appointments I've always found them

> really accommodating with days/times.


This is my experience too.

There is a school of thought that the government sold too good a deal to GPs a number of years ago. Hence the taxpayer could be seen to be overpaying for the service generally.


However i agree with others above that DMC is a very good practice, run efficiently with good doctors. We are fortunate to have it in the area.

Interestingly by and large the majority of Doctors opposed the NHS in 1945 and were pretty much bribed into joining - Drs as a whole do a good job and make many sacrifices and work hard to get qualified.....but I don't buy into the selfless altruitsic light that they are sometimes portrayed in.

Well.....its true that Labour almost spent 30% more on health but

its also true Consultant and GP salaries rose by 2-300% and 80% of the money did not make it to patient care...so rather than Capitalism I'd say Blairism....and as we know once you put money up you can't reverse it....whos fault....Socialists

pissing away Govt borrowed money....while meaning well always fail to take into account human nature/greed etc...

ironic really

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Granted Shoreditch is still London, but given that the council & organisers main argument for the festival is that it is a local event, for local people (to use your metaphor), there's surprisingly little to back this up. As Blah Blah informatively points out, this is now just a commercial venture with no local connection. Our park is regarded by them as an asset that they've paid to use & abuse. There's never been any details provided of where the attendees are from, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's never been any details provided of any increase in sales for local businesses, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's promises of "opportunities" for local people & traders to work at the festival, but, again, no figures to back this up. And lastly, the fee for the whole thing goes 100% to running the Events dept, and the dozens of free events that no-one seems able to identify, and, yes, you guessed it - no details provided for by the council. So again, no tangible benefit for the residents of the area.
    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...