Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The OP has certainly opened a debate (they didn't want to open a debate)!? about the leave/remain question on the forum on the 1st October and not been on here since 8th October.


Maybe they are too tired after distributing leaflets and going on a march.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What on Earth is wrong with both of you (and

> civilservant) We?ve had all the crowing and PR

> hype, what great turn outs, evidence of a

> groundswell that the British people have changed

> their minds etc.

>

> Unfortunately, as embarrassing as you may find

> this, the pictures of those who participated in

> the marches do not reflect the multicultural

> nature of Britain. Fact. Not my fault. There may

> be many pictures that I haven?t seen that are more

> balanced but I haven?t seen them in the papers, on

> TV or on Google images.

>

> Why is it racist to question the seemingly

> unrepresentative nature of the public record of

> the marches?

>

> Rhetorical question - I don?t expect any sensible

> answers


oooh keano, the poor darkies need you to speak up for them, is that it?

take it from me, mate, sometimes they're actually able to make up their minds for themselves, believe it or not


you have the temerity, the absolute arsiness, to ask what the matter is with me, do you?

if you play the race card, then come on, at least have the guts to play it through to the end, don't try and duck out, like a lily-livered nincompoop, you prat!

civilservant Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> keano77 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What on Earth is wrong with both of you (and

> > civilservant) We?ve had all the crowing and PR

> > hype, what great turn outs, evidence of a

> > groundswell that the British people have

> changed

> > their minds etc.

> >

> > Unfortunately, as embarrassing as you may find

> > this, the pictures of those who participated in

> > the marches do not reflect the multicultural

> > nature of Britain. Fact. Not my fault. There

> may

> > be many pictures that I haven?t seen that are

> more

> > balanced but I haven?t seen them in the papers,

> on

> > TV or on Google images.

> >

> > Why is it racist to question the seemingly

> > unrepresentative nature of the public record of

> > the marches?

> >

> > Rhetorical question - I don?t expect any

> sensible

> > answers

>

> oooh keano, the poor darkies need you to speak up

> for them, is that it?

> take it from me, mate, sometimes they're actually

> able to make up their minds for themselves,

> believe it or not

>

> you have the temerity, the absolute arsiness, to

> ask what the matter is with me, do you?

> if you play the race card, then come on, at least

> have the guts to play it through to the end, don't

> try and duck out, like a lily-livered nincompoop,

> you prat!



Oh oh, the edf equivalent of the nutter who sits next to you on the bus

I didn?t think it was possible for to make yourself look like more of an idiot over this Keano, but well done, you?ve managed to!


Shame you?ve got so little self-awareness that you don?t understand how stupid you?ve been, but I guess back in your day people could take a joke and knew their place, eh?

What is the ethnic makeup of the UK as a whole and how does this compare with the Peoples Vote march. I think you might find it's very similar to be honest. The Peoples Vote march was a UK wide march held in London.


White British is 87% of the UK population.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_groups_in_the_United_Kingdom


Edit: When you have a subsection of the population as big as 700,000+ then it begins to approximate the real population makeup I'd say (not a statistics guy)

As ever, haters gonna hate. You can imagine the sneering Brexiter remarks had there been a disproportionately high number of 'non-white' faces, Londonistan etc. As John says, it was representative of the country as a whole, groups from Orkney to Cornwall came, all-inclusive, all getting along, all having a good time. It's quite clear the Brixiters are rattled by the huge numbers that showed up, it's a game changer, well done everyone who went, it was a fantastic day...

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "game changer". Really?


If parliament votes against Theresa May's deal and we are left in no-mans land with parliament not wanting no deal then maybe, maybe not.


I don't know where we're headed, May might be gone in a week, it's all volatile.

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm, so not a "game changer" then!


I'm still on the fence over that :)


Theresa May today was supposed to have said ?None of this is about me. It?s all about you.? other reports say the quote was "Brexit talks are not about me or my personal fortunes" either way she's feeling the pressure..

Notice Chris Grayling puts party before country in the below quote ...


"One of Theresa May?s key allies has called on Conservative MPs to show ?calm, level heads? on Brexit during a potentially treacherous political week for the prime minister, insisting that a deal acceptable to a majority of the party is still possible."

JohnL Wrote:

----------------------------------------------------

>

> I don't know where we're headed, May might be gone

> in a week, it's all volatile.


There was a leadership vote, May won, the party needs to respect the vote and the will of the party membership.

How dare they think they can change their mind, they're nothing but enemies of the party, quislings, a betrayal of democracy!...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • SNTs don't, as you seem to imply,  comprise just PCSOs. I thought we all knew that.  The facts are easily available.  This one consists of a sergeant, two PCs and a PCSO:  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/351681-dulwich-hill-newsletter-september-2024/#comment-1681337 or https://www.met.police.uk/area/your-area/met/southwark/dulwich-hill/on-the-team/crime-map. i've been to another SNT's meetings, and looked at the Met details of some others, and that complement looks fairly typical.  I've not been to one of these Cuppa things so can't speak of them.
    • PCSOs may not need specific qualifications, but they go through a reasonably rigorous recruitment process. Or at least they used to. It may have changed.
    • The ones I've dropped into may be organised by PCSOs in the SNT but regular PCs have attended. They have actually been a cuppa with a copper, but not necessarily loads of them. 
    • @Pereira Neves "Cuppa with a Coppa" is a misrepresentation as PCSOs are not real police.   They have no more powers of arrest that any public citizen. They may have the "authority" to advise the regular police of a crime - just like Joe Public. One exception is that they can issue fixed penalty notices to people who cycle on a footpath. We see people cycling on the footpath every day but have never seen a PCSO issue a fixed penalty notice to anybody. No  qualifications are needed to become a PCSO.  At best, all they do is reassure and advise the public with platitudes.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...