Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hawley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It was in poor/middling condition in 2013. Things

> went rapidly downhill when the (unfinished) loft

> conversion was carried out in 2014. The "project

> manager" had no building industry experience

> whatsoever, he was simply an associate of the

> owner. The guys who carried out the work lived in

> the property for the duration, without electricity

> or heating to the best of my knowledge. I was also

> led to believe that, bizarre as it now sounds,

> Southwark Council funded the works in the form of

> a grant. The property was to be handed over to

> them for rented housing.

>

> The owner goes by the pseudonym of James Richards.

> His real name is Jacob Reichman and he is an utter

> tool.


The last line says everything about what is wrong with the UK today...STILL!

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hawley Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It was in poor/middling condition in 2013.

> Things

> > went rapidly downhill when the (unfinished)

> loft

> > conversion was carried out in 2014. The

> "project

> > manager" had no building industry experience

> > whatsoever, he was simply an associate of the

> > owner. The guys who carried out the work lived

> in

> > the property for the duration, without

> electricity

> > or heating to the best of my knowledge. I was

> also

> > led to believe that, bizarre as it now sounds,

> > Southwark Council funded the works in the form

> of

> > a grant. The property was to be handed over to

> > them for rented housing.

> >

> > The owner goes by the pseudonym of James

> Richards.

> > His real name is Jacob Reichman and he is an

> utter

> > tool.

>

> The last line says everything about what is wrong

> with the UK today...STILL!


What does that mean? the fact he has a Germanic name?

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hawley Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It was in poor/middling condition in 2013.

> Things

> > went rapidly downhill when the (unfinished)

> loft

> > conversion was carried out in 2014. The

> "project

> > manager" had no building industry experience

> > whatsoever, he was simply an associate of the

> > owner. The guys who carried out the work lived

> in

> > the property for the duration, without

> electricity

> > or heating to the best of my knowledge. I was

> also

> > led to believe that, bizarre as it now sounds,

> > Southwark Council funded the works in the form

> of

> > a grant. The property was to be handed over to

> > them for rented housing.

> >

> > The owner goes by the pseudonym of James

> Richards.

> > His real name is Jacob Reichman and he is an

> utter

> > tool.

>

> The last line says everything about what is wrong

> with the UK today...STILL!


Sorry but...what has his name anglicised or otherwise got to do with anything?

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> > His real name is Jacob Reichman and he is an

> utter

> > tool.

>

> The last line says everything about what is wrong

> with the UK today...STILL!


Ah, adding anti-semitism to your Islamaphobia I see. Reported.

P.O.U.S.theWonderCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> > The last line says everything about what is

> wrong

> > with the UK today...STILL!

>

> The above says everything that is wrong with the

> UK today, still.


Yes - I don't want to be too critical of the moderators of this forum, who do a splendid job, but it's a bit disappointing that a clear hate speech antisemitic comment is permitted to stand.

P.O.U.S.theWonderCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> > The last line says everything about what is

> wrong

> > with the UK today...STILL!

>

> The above says everything that is wrong with the

> UK today, still.


Others who could be deemed not as offensive are banished to the lounge or somesuch.

I am half Jewish so don't take kindly to antisemitism on a public forum.


I may be wrong but isn't the offending poster a teacher? If so i am sure that his employers wouldn't be too pleased to know that he holds such views and that he might be expressing them in class.

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all

Some of the posts on this thread have disappeared.

I walked past this house today. Scaffolding is now shoring up the front of the house and a small section of brickwork has been removed from the top of the front wall. Hopefully this is the start of major remedial work.

Hi Rahrahrah

In one of my posts that got deleted I said that it's been empty for many years (15+?).

The owner started to put a loft conversion on it which can be seen better from the back. Before the work was finished it was abandoned and has been empty ever since. I suspect it will all need re-doing. I usually walk past it several times a day so am quite well acquainted with it!

tarafitness Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I feel so sorry for the people who have just

> bought the property next door!

>


Only when you move out of SE22 (and London in general) do you begin to properly appreciate the insanity of the capital's housing market.


?845K for 1143 sq ft of living space. Whole house needs renovating. Central heating installed. New kitchen, bathroom(s). Garden overhauled.


And just look what is next door.


Complete madness.

tarafitness Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I feel so sorry for the people who have just

> bought the property next door!

>


Why would you feel sorry for the people who just bought the house next door. The derelict house was there and visible, they had a choice not to buy the house and if they are on a tight budget they could have looked for something smaller, or something in an area where you get more for your money - tulse hill/forest hill.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...