Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sadly everyone else DOES pass judgement based on what is in newspapers, if Chav was not on this forum and no one knew about her, you would be passing judgement, it is human nature.


We ALL pass judgement but naturally we are more lenient when it comes to friends and family and people we know!

We ALL have an opinion.

Mine? well lets say, I have seen a lot, lived a lot and I would have taken a completely different road to Chav but then my personality and mentality is obviously different to hers.

We all have choices and when it comes to kids, well, I know I would never do anything that would warrant my going into prison if I had kids, but alas, that is me.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/8/#findComment-59845
Share on other sites

We pass judgement because it is in our nature to. It is also in our nature to overcome this as something about it does not seem right. When we reach that point we understand something about our life. It is not based on what we think of other people as that changes like the seasons. We need to know ourself and if/when we do that we will be happy and judgement will not exist. Ce la vie!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/8/#findComment-59863
Share on other sites

Chav - I read your post/life story a while back which means you put it out in the public domain. If you do stand and win make sure you do not throw it away by handing the press or your rivals some silly soundbites. Make sure you learn from your past choices and think carefully about what you are going to say. The press is amoral and has a life of it's own, its all about copy and headlines. Remember if people do vote for you do not let them down by making there votes null & Void. Politics is just that.. politics.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/8/#findComment-59895
Share on other sites

I am not ashamed of having supported my family as a sex worker and believe that it should be decriminalised and unionised, but I do regret the fact that I got addicted to heroin and all the mess that came with that. I agree with Asset and Snorky we need an adult debate about drug policy and addiction in general (including addiction to prescription drugs and alcohol) as prohibition clearly does not work.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/8/#findComment-59897
Share on other sites

youve certainly lived a life CWALD - good to hear you are moving on.


everyone has regrets of a time they wish a different choice was made...


The sex worker aspect is an emotive topic - but we all use our bodies in some sort of slavery to "the man" - on a personal ( and maybe facile )level, It doesnt make any difference to me, be it digging roads or working in a bank - its best use of physical & mental assets to ensure survival.


Im surprised about your christianity, but its not that execptional I suppose - Ive seen it with family members in the past - I have nothing but respect for the christian ethos & the work that many people do ( not however the hateful judgemental US version) - the regimented organised aside of religion is another matter that I do have strong opinions on.but thats another topic entirely.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/8/#findComment-59916
Share on other sites

'middle class recreational drug use'


What is this exactly?


Every week, up and down the length and breadth of the country, millions - many millions - of people: old, young, poor, rich, short, tall, gay, straight, professional, unemployed, black or white - pick and choose what drugs they want to take for that night out, night in, trip to a nightclub, wedding, barbeque - according to what they want/can afford/can get.


I can only think of one or two people out of the hundred I know reasonably well who don't (and never have).

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/8/#findComment-59928
Share on other sites

I do wish someone in the know would address my two honest questions.


Is there a difference between drugs like cocaine, ectasy, etc. and heorin/crack? You've conveniently lumped them together and I'm keen to know if we those of us who are prepared to listen to legalisation are expected to lump them together too.


Also, your comparison of homosexuality and drug use seems to suggest both are choices. Is this what you mean?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/8/#findComment-59930
Share on other sites

Maurice,

I think you're reading something into The Snorks post which isn't there.

His point is simply that: legalising homosexuality did not lead to an increase in the number of homosexuals. You're either going to do it or you aren't, regardless of the law.

The same is true of drugs. There isn't a supply issue, because drugs are everywhere. Sooner or later the option will be there, and you're either going to do them or you aren't.


I've been offered every drug there is. Availability didn't mean I wanted to do them all.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/8/#findComment-59934
Share on other sites

Drug use isnt gentic no, but genetic preponderance to addiction or shtrill seeking is probabaly so


I worked in night clubs during a hiatus from study or travel, during the E & Acid boom of the '80s/ early '90s - many card carrying friday binge drinkers moved from 10 pints & a kebab to a pair of E's and staying up all night - peoples need for a Buzz adapts to what is around


in a facile sense, the drug is irrelevant - alcoholics dont class themselves as drug addicts, but they are


I thinkn getting bogged down in the emchanics of endlessley classifying drugs according to penalties ( & thus "danger" )is diversionary - I have never been asaulted by someone skunked off their face at an all night garage, but have been in iffy situations with beer monsters - yet Alcohol is delivered in measured doses ( a shot / a half / a nip ) at licenced vendors, yet weed isnt.


Comparing coke & skag isnt productive, because they dont compare - in buzz. hit or cost


that doesnt mean to say weed is great and risk free - far from it


but adult discussion is needed now the ( I think ) prohibition has been pretty much proven to do little except marginalise & criminalise the use & market for drugs.






On a personal and wholly detached view on this - this is just mine - one of the reasons for the booming need for "drugs" and the abuse / misure of drugs ( legal & illegal ) is to do with the streessful conditions humans live in now - we self medicate to give us a release form the constrained. trapped, stressed lives we lead - the 9-5, the routine, the grinding numbing mundaniety of our unfulfilled and sometimes proto - mechanistic lives.


We are not happy doing what we do - the baubles of success - the big house / new car/ armani after shave / bigger bonus - these are all a placebo - there is something innate within us that rebels against such a constricted and fruitless life.The drugs used to self medicate abnd to become addictive could be skag/ weed/ the job we do / anything whatsoever


as Chav suggested earlier, drug use is a symptom of a deeper malaise in many cases - the drug is a key.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/8/#findComment-59969
Share on other sites

Maurice.. I will take your objection at face value.


This is the quote you're talking about..


Snorky wrote:

"legalisation isnt the same as promotion- just as legalising homosexuality wasnt promoting it"


"Legalisation isn't the same as promotion." Do you disagree with this?

"Legalising homosexuality wasn't promoting it." Do you disagree with this?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/8/#findComment-59970
Share on other sites

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I wouldn't disagree with a lot of Snorky's post,

> but it would be unfair not to add that a lot of

> people do drugs because they just like doing them.

> I do. I don't see them as filling some sort of

> vacuous hole. I just like them.



theres that as well of course


I dont mean to trivialise many of the posts on here, but im sure someone once said something along the lines of


"if drugs werent fun, then people wouldnt do them"


fun can so easily turn grim of course

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/8/#findComment-59974
Share on other sites

Maurice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree mostly Bob. But do appreciate, I think if

> you legalise drugs you will have more people do

> them that might not otherwise. Whereas with

> homosexuality, you weren't going to create more

> homosexuals.


Ok Maurice.. I take your point.

I still think the comparison is useful though. In both instances, I think the idea that state approval (or not) is a key factor as to whether people want to take drugs or 'be a homosexual' misses the point entirely.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/8/#findComment-59995
Share on other sites

I think it's a terrible comparison.


Because after legalising homosexuality we were left with the exact problem of promotion. IE clause 28

only just been repealed and still causing misinformation in schools.

By which I mean that many teachers really dont think it's acceptable to talk positively and openly about homosexuality in primary schools.


but that could be a whole other thread.

Let's keep with drugs on this one

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/8/#findComment-60022
Share on other sites

We should not criminalise people for who they are: be it colour of skin, eyes, hair, height, sexual orientation. Certainly not.


However, it is less clear to me whether we should criminalise choices on drugs (of all classes). I go back to my issue about crack and heorin. They seem a different issue to ectasy and cocaine.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/8/#findComment-60030
Share on other sites

Ecstasy and marijuana have very little, if any, 'physical' dependency, amphetamines and cocaine have a slightly increased 'physical' dependency, not sure where heroin lies on the scale of physical dependency but there definitely is one, just as there is with alcohol and nocotine, in fact I think in studies that have been done, alcohol and nicotine come out as creating the highest physical dependency.

The issue is the tendency towards an addiction that the user will have, if there is an addicitve, destructive nature then that will manifest itself, whether by an addiction to heroin, alcohol or shopping!

There is no differentiation between the drugs really. How many lives are ruined by alcohol abuse? Is that going to change if alcohol is prohibited? It's been tried and it didn't work. Education is what is needed.

There will always be people who do things to excess.

We have to remember that getting into an altered state of mind has been part of the human psyche since we had a psyche!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/8/#findComment-60059
Share on other sites

The only way to truly understand what drugs do to you is to.. you know.. do them.


I have never 'done' an opiate or crack cocaine so I'm afraid I can't tell you anything about them. Due to the fear factor which these drugs still hold, most people who do them are in a certain 'place' already before they do. As Snorky said, "The problem with Skag isnt the skag".

The balance to drugs is your everyday life. I don't get up in the morning, pop a pill and head-out to a meeting with a couple of wraps in my pocket - regardless of how much I like it.


From ever since I can remember, the drug which has always brought the greatest threat of harm is alcohol. It is still the case.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/8/#findComment-60135
Share on other sites

I'd quite like to hear from someone with more knowledge on this issue - seems like this thread is very much "I think/I feel" but very little hard evidence is being introduced to back these feelings up.


My own feeling is that there is validity in what some people are saying and that drug use has some relationship to the shittiness of the lives that people lead compared to the expectations they have been given (whatever social stratum they belong to) and some people choose to escape this. My own feeling is that all recreational drug use is a form of abuse, but I like a glass of wine and an occasional pint of beer - my own hypocrisy is shining there.


What I do know is that my own experience growing up in Northern Ireland was that the lines (pardon the pun) between the drug trade and illegal/paramilitary activity were clear. While it may be less clear in SE London, everyone must on some level recognise that the importation of things like heroin/cocaine can only be done by reasonably large-scale criminal conspiracies. It's not a cottage industry (or indeed a nice middle-class Farmer's Market option, Dita) and people are hurt and exploited all along the way. And Amanda appears to have been one of those people.


To Amanda, I would say that I admire you for turning things round. But I don't think that this is enough on its own to make you worth voting for, in the same way that I don't think that what you did in the past is the end of the story that makes you unsuitable for office. Your honesty on the past is neither here nor there. Let it come down to the issues and how you represent yourself now - I would probably have more trouble with your description of yourself as the reductive and confrontational "chav with a law degree" than anything else.


And by the way (and probably worth another thread) where do forums like this fit within the framework of the Representation of the People Acts?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/8/#findComment-60137
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...