Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I do think I'm being reasonable.


I've just reread the thread and can't see anything I've said that's unreasonable.


Meanwhile, BB100 has taken the perfectly insignificamt and worthwhile enterprise of a school Remembrance Day ceremony and equated it with brainwashing and child abuse, and DaveR is furious with me because he incorrectly thinks I want to force people to wear poppies with threats of violence. He does this without reading my posts so I have to keep repeating them.

Having lost friends and comrades over 23 years of service, I wear my poppy as a mark of respect...


I also wear it as a message to younger generations that the freedoms we take so easily for granted carry a price.


A price paid by strangers for strangers, who gave there all so we could make choices in life.....good or bad.


It is also a recognition to the many heroic men and women whose actions went unsung.


To those who have served it is that complicated and that simple.


I could not care less if this child decides to make a stand against his school's rules....


The fact he can is based on the actions of others lost in the mists of time.


They deserve a moments thought and respect because they were mostly very ordinary people in real life thrust into extraordinary circumstances not of their own making.

That's right acm, and asking children to wear poppies to a remembrance service where they can discuss and explore its meaning is part of the process "to educate our children so they can make informed decisions" when they are adults.


As you've seen in the comments above, events like these are often used as opportunities by people who don't give a shit about the sacrifices of others to use children as proxies in an infantile attack on authority.


That in itself is a tragedy.


I share your sadness with the daily deaths of individuals on national service.

I share your sadness with the daily deaths of individuals on national service


Semantic or pedantics - National Service refers to conscripted military personnel. Every British serviceman in Afghanistan is a volunteer, which adds a further dimension to the sadness of their deaths and suffering.

  • 3 weeks later...

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Meanwhile, BB100 has taken the perfectly

> insignificamt and worthwhile enterprise of a

> school Remembrance Day ceremony and equated it

> with brainwashing and child abuse,


I'm so glad you've been able to continue this discussion without me. Hugh it was you who mentioned ''They don't have adult rights for good reason'' and I merely pointed out that yes they do, they have extra rights because of adult abuses. So you are twisting my words again.


Anyway I asked my nephew if any other children didn't wear their poppy. He said lots of children didn't, they just kept it in their pocket to whip out if confronted by a teacher - that says it all really.

That shows you kids behaving like kids, that's why we don't treat them as adults.


It's a part of the learning process to recognise that the poppy that has meaning and importance to other people that can involve changing our behaviour in respect of their views.


Everyone's a winner here BB100

I think it's safe to say that you've entirely missed the point. No better reason to ensure that you don't get too involved in education. :))


Have you not realised yet that the exercise in wearing poppies has nothing to do with wearing poppies? The lesson is not about forcing people to respect the dead?

Gosh, is it cynical wednesday or something?


Given that most of us feel that society has become too selfish and preoccupied with rights rather than responsibilities, I'd have thought an educational opportunity to reflect on how fortunate our generations are, thanks to the sacrifices of previous generations, would be applauded.


Instead we indulge our childrens' immature, solipsistic instincts as some sort of healthy questioning of authority and write the whole thing off as a PR stunt.


Weird frankly.

If it wasn't then why were teachers checking poppies on the way OUT of the school gate? Since you know neither the children or the school I don't see how you can judge, and my question was never about whether they should but about whether they could.

The irony is that you don't see 'how you can judge', but that's exactly what you are doing.


The problem is that you aren't familiar with education, your views are seriously tainted by a virulent anti-authority streak, you credit children with adult experience and judgement, and you have an unhealthy egotistical tendency which causes you to elevate 'rights' over 'responsibilities'.


All of these combine to a great flashing warning light that reads 'DO NOT GET INOLVED IN EDUCATION'.

The problem is you keep jumping to conclusions as I am familiar with education, however, I don't work in secondary schools where there are obviously still people like you that insist their values and beliefs are the only way. Your days in education are over Hugh and it's you that's out of touch.

*knocks on imposing door with a large, brightly polished brass sign with the words 'The Chair' engraved neatly upon it*


*scribbles on some handy ivory coloured parchment 'Please help put a stop to 'touched you last' comments in the fine old Drawing Room. Its worse than the tatty Lounge these days. Thank you.' Shoves under aforementioned door*

  • 4 weeks later...

Can we get back to facts?

Which school imposed the poppy rule?


You see, I don't think that this can be done and I'd be mildly surprised if any school had. There may have been some pressure from particular teachers/older pupils, but I don't think it could be mandatory so I would like someone to quote me chapter and verse,

Lynne

Oh come on Lynne - what's your beef?


Are you going to go round there and tell them what's what? Tell them that they have no right to set school rules, that you know better, that kids can do what they want, that if you were in charge it would be a better school?


What's next? You going to set the law on them? Sue them? Push burgers through the fence?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think it's connected with the totem pole renovation celebrations They have passed now, but the notice has been there since then (at least that's when I first saw it - I passed it on the 484 and also took a photo!)
    • Labour was damned, no matter what it did, when it came to the budget. It loves go on about the black hole, but if Labour had had its way, we'd have been in lockdown for longer and the black hole would be even bigger.  Am I only the one who thinks it's time the NHS became revenue-generating? Not private, but charging small fees for GP appts, x-rays etc? People who don't turn up for GP and out-patient appointments should definitely be charged a cancellation fee. When I lived in Norway I got incredible medical treatment, including follow up appointments, drugs, x-rays, all for £200. I was more than happy to pay it and could afford to. For fairness, make it somehow means-tested.  I am sure there's a model in there somewhere that would be fair to everyone. It's time we stopped fetishising something that no longer works for patient or doctor.  As for major growth, it's a thing of the past, no matter where in the world you live, unless it's China. Or unless you want a Truss-style, totally de-regulated economy and love capitalism with a large C. 
    • If you read my post I expect a compromise with the raising of the cap on agricultural property so that far less 'ordinary' farmers do not get caught  Clarkson is simply a high profile land owner who is not in the business as a conventional farmer.  Here's a nice article that seems to explain things well  https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/nov24-farming-budget-inheritance-tax-apr/ It's too early to speculate on 2029.  I expect that most of us who were pleased that Labour got in were not expecting anything radical. Whilst floating the idea of hitting those looking to minimise inheritance tax, including gifting, like fuel duty they also chickened put. I'm surprised that anyone could start touting for the Tories after 14 years of financial mismanagement and general incompetence. Surly not.  A very low bar for Labour but they must be well aware that there doesn't need to be much of a swing form Reform to overturn Labour's artificially large majority.  But even with a generally rabid right wing press, now was the opportunity to be much braver.
    • And I worry this Labour government with all of it's own goals and the tax increases is playing into Farage's hands. With Trump winning in the US, his BFF Farage is likely to benefit from strained relations between the US administration and the UK one. As Alastair Campbell said on a recent episode of The Rest is Politics who would not have wanted to be a fly on the wall of the first call between Angela Rayner and JD Vance....those two really are oil and water. Scary, scary times right now and there seems to be a lack of leadership and political nous within the government at a time when we really need it - there aren't many in the cabinet who you think will play well on the global stage.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...