Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You cannot drop a curb at will. The local authority must agree to do the work for a fee. So if they are doing the work then permission will have been granted. It's not part of the building planning permission bureaucracy however I believe, but Highways department. So neighbours will not be consulted. As I understand it.

There's another thread on the forum somewhere where I posed the exact same question about 2 years ago. We've had about 3-4 of our neighbours put them in in recent years, and have never gotten any notice. In addition to the absolutely useless double yellow lines on the corners of our street, it really makes on street parking a 'joy'.....


Just to add though, that neighbour consolation for any form of structural alteratio nowadays no longer involves a letter in most cases, and simply involves a notice of a few lampposts on your street, which are very easy not to notice sometime...

I learned the other day that you can park on anyone's drive and it's not illegal as long as you're not blocking anyone in! It was a bit of a jaw dropper to be honest. So if your neighbours put in a drop kerb, you can't find anywhere to park on your road & their drive is empty, you can just use it as a parking space.
I think that's not quite true. As I understand it, no penalty notice can be issued for the blockage of access to a drive with a dropped kerb, other than on a complaint by the occupier ( http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1877690#msg-1877815). So if they arrived back home from a drive and found you blocking their entrance, they could complain and hope that you'd get speedily ticketed. I'd actually be rather surprised if they couldn't do that in any case. What's your source?
They can complain to the council, but the council has no facilities to take any action and so they don't/won't. Google it to see. I was told by a friend who had an awful time with people parking on their drive near a train station, discovering that there was in fact nothing they could legally do, I was very suprised, so investigated further, and sure enough....
I think there's quite a difference between parking across a drive and parking on it. But if you parked on someone else's drive they would need to take a private prosecution out for trespass - neither the council nor the police can respond to otherwise legal parking - which all parking on private property would be, unless otherwise stated. If you had a problem as a drive owner I would put a notice saying cars parked without permission on your land would be clamped and released only after payment of a ?150 fee, or seized and disposed of if left for 7 days or more. And buy a clamp and do it. The law then would be entirely on your side, I believe.

MarkT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> sillywoman, you say "you can park on anyone's

> drive". Are you saying on their private property?


I was doubtful but took sw's "it's not illegal as long as you're not blocking anyone in!", generously, as implying that it was about parking on the road. The blocking would be irrelevant if it weren't. I suspect now that I was wrong.


I'd assumed it was common knowledge that the council can't do anything about someone parking on your private property (whether obstructively or not), any more than they can if someone pitches their tent on your lawn. Those are civil trespasses, actionable by the occupier.

No no, you can park actually ON someone's driveway. Yes it's trespass, but the police won't touch it cos it's now a council matter, and the council don't have the facility to deal with it, so they won't do anything. Of course they COULD issue a PCN as per Sally Eva's (rather odd) post (why would they lie?), but they won't/don't. My poor friend had someone parked on her drive (locally) for 6 months with no recourse to any law to help her for the whole time.

We?ve recently had a dropped kerb put in. We?d asked the council before and been refused as too close to traffic humps that at the time required 5m clearance each side. That didn?t seem to stop people parking over them in any case!


This time, we applied, they came out and said they could do it and gave a price which we went ahead with. Yes, it stops a space on the road. But as the house has been converted into flats, it takes 3 cars off the road so a net gain for neighbours.


Council advised that they won?t put a white line across as that means nothing. But they can ask the PCN officers to include it in patrols and enforce if required. Admittedly as I don?t own a car, I?m unlikely to be impacted either way😝

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...