Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Saw The Kings Speech tonight. Very good movie well acted with several good performances and Colin Firth is very good. Remains to be seen if he gets the best actor. I liked it because the subject matter is relatively narrow but the development of the story is nicely done.


Colin Firth was very good but Geoffrey Rush as his speech therapist was superb. Timothy Spall as Forest Hill's version of Churchill .

  • 2 weeks later...

Drove over to Clapham to go and see Black Swan on Saturday, but there was a big police incident in the High Street causing us to miss the showing at the picturehouse.


But I did catch the stunning Requiem for a Dream on Friday night on TV. A completely amazing, shocking, intense film.




Thanks for that clip Mick Mac - poignant considering the Torres move this week. Thomas did that for us and was then a Liverpool player

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...

This thread or the computer games thread? Aah this one.


"We are Sexbobomb and we are here to make the funniest film I've seen in a long time!!!!!!!!"


Also on my transatlantic sorties Paul, mildly funny, self indlugent nerdfest.

The Eagle, hackneyed, cliched homoerotic adventure that I swear is actually Last of the Mohicans in the second reel with CGI faces of the new actors pasted on, but for all that actually quite fun.

Killing Bono, sort of Withnail and I meets The Commitments without being nearly as good as either but again passed muster as entertainment, and I'd love to know how much of it is true.

Wow, I've just realised that the director of Scott Pilgrim Versus the World, Wright, is Edgar Wright of Spaced & Sean of the Dead fame.


It would seem that Simon Pegg may not have actually been his muse after all, but may have been holding him back!!! And that would explain why every single scene is packed with a dizzying array of cultural references from cinematic classics through horror and pop to, of course, video gaming.


It comes close to genius frankly!

  • 4 weeks later...
I saw this last night. I thought it was beautifully shot, and I really enjoyed the soundtrack, but I thought the content dire. It's almost as though the the Director couldn't make up his mind as to whether he was making a drama, an arthouse movie, a nature programme, or - even - a documentary on the cosmos. What a shame; I was looking forward to a film of substance, but - to me - the result was confusion. Very pretentious stuff. As per Ladygooner, do something else with your 2 hours.
Oh dear. I was planning to see TTOL tomorrow, then saw the above two comments and provisionally changed my mind. Then a look at the Wikipedia article, and changed my mind again. But it was David Cox's review in the Guardian that's decided me that I can wait until I'm in a truly curious and disinterested frame of mind, or it turns up on the box, or I find out who Jennifer Aniston is and that I like her work, before seeing it.

The advice seems to be that you've got to give it four hours of your life!

David Sexton in the Evening Standard, Peter Bradshaw in the Guardian, Jason Solomon in the Observer, admitted that it made a lot more sense second time round, although Nigel Andrews in the FT only gave it 2 out of 5.

Ooh, a Terence Malick film, cool. Will definitely check it out.

I don't think he's ever put a foot wrong personally (though averaging a film a decade, there'e not a huge canon to be fair).


His films tend to be more like tone poems than drama as such. If cinema as art isn't your bag then I guess his films just seem a bit boring.


I remember coming out of Thin Red Line with bored crowds complaining about the length and lack of Saving Private Ryan moments, whilst I thought it was one of the most beautiful and poignant films I'd ever seen.


I've no idea what this one's like, but it might be an excuse to finally return to the cinema after an almost 2 year absence thanks to the mocklet.

Saving Private Ryan = Noel Gallagher = Brash, two dimensional and not as good as it thinks it is


The Thin Red Line = Damon Albarn = good quality, rather too pretentious and when you stop to think about it a bit annoying*


?


*but not as annoying as Alex bloody James!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I think that pretty-much sums it up.


Though I'm definitely in the 'loves a good pretentious film' camp, so I would say that.


'Senna' is definitely well worth seeing, though I'm unsure as to how much a large-screen viewing really adds to the experience. Unlike Maxi Jazz with his brief vocal expostulations delivered from the rear of the Brixton auditorium - as the story unfolded.

Please Give


Watched this last night


( lovefilm )




Ahh yes, I liked it very much.


There's a whole thing going on about the pursuit and provenance of "collectables & vintage " furniture etc, which made me laugh out-loud.



( I very nearly fell off my danish leather Stouby sofa )




NETTE:)

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Has anyone caught 'Drive'?


I missed the hype so knew nothing about it beforehand. It's risible, pointlessly pretentious, shambolic, shallow and gratuitously unpleasant. It really is one bad film.


We ought to be talking Razzies here.. why is this film generating a positive reaction amongst reviewers?

  • 2 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...
Managed to sneak a trip to the brilliant Clapham Picturehouse last week and caught the thought provoking documentary by Carol Morley called "Dreams of a Life" about Joyce Vincent, a woman who was found in her Wood Green flat three years after she died. A remarkable piece of work. "Dreams of a Life"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andrew and Arnold are very good. They have UK based techies and are proactive in managing OpenReach as the copper supplier. 
    • We're not talking about people who've bought farms. We're talking about people who have inherited multi-million pound estates, having done nothing to earn it. Why should they not have to pay some tax on that.  
    • If 500 farms sell off 20% of their land each year (the PMs estimate on the back of a Rizla paper)  then how long before we lose large chunks of farm land ?  As for giving away land, sure providing they live 7 years afterwards  Stop being a labour cheerleader and put yourself in farmers wellies for a moment.  Farming is a necessity, doesn't make Massive profits and after you consider the 7 days a week often 14 hour days, I bet most farmers don't even earn minimum wage per hour.  You will soon be whinging if there's no fresh veg on the shelves to go with your non existent turkey at Chrustmas.     
    • it's not that many farms and they can always gift it to their hardworking offspring before they die, can't they?   as for Trump. funny how no-one ever complains when it's trump doing Name calling. Or Tories talking about EU leaders or threatening Irish food supply - never about "making it hard to work with people" then 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...