Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It wasn't edge of the seat stuff, and it kept skipping back and forth from jungle warfare, to a state visit to the US some years later, where he made a speech at a conference of leaders. Not sure it flowed that well, but it had plenty of good points, not least the portrayal of the lead.


There are voice overs of Che being interviewed in English, and I think this was to keep you abreast of the story if you got lazy with the subtitles (or didn't speak the language obviously).


It would have been far too long to do as a single film, but I feel like I've stopped half way through, so will be able to give a more full opinion once I've watched part 2, which hopefully will be winging it's way from LOVEFILM shortly...

Keef,


I totally agree about the storyline jumping all over the shop concerning Che's routine of Guerrilla warfare and thrusting politics.


I did get a bit frustrated with it being in Spanish with subtitles but I think Steven Soderburgh made the right decision. The story is set in a Spanish speaking country affecting Spanish speaking people. It would be wrong and unconvincing for it to be otherwise.


However,


Lets not spoil the film for Mockney eh.

annaj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Probably way too mainstream for this thread, but

> has anyone seen The Time Traveller's Wife yet?

> I loved the book and I'm torn between really

> wanting to see it and afraid that they will have

> ruined it.



They have ruined it- please save your cash! Remembering the last scene in the book, I was waiting for it and it didn't happen! (i mean when Claire is an old lady) Best film recently has been indie called 'Sleep Furiously' saw it twice-nice doc set in tiny Welsh village and daily life, it's got music from Aphex Twin too, just lovely...

I saw the Constant Gardner last night by Brazilian director Fernando Meirelles (of City of God fame) starring Ralph Fiennes and Rachel Weisz.


It dealt with a couple working together to uncover the wrongs being perpetrated against Africa by European and American corporations under the ever paranoid observation of the Foreign office's Africa desk who actively sought to destroy the couple outright, by whatever means possible.


I've never really been a great fan of Fiennes but he was an undeniably good compliment to Weisz's role. They were both very good.


The feature also served as a great big 'up yours' against the shady collaborations of big business and official agencies.


Bill Nighy's portrayal of a backstabbing diplomat was also a crucially breathtaking piece of acting further reinforcing the hope that I'll one day follow his example in how to grow old mischieviously. I also have no shame in admitting that I'll cry when he shuffles off his mortal coil.

Has anyone seen Sin Nombre yet?


I saw it yesterday and I really enjoyed it although it was pretty grim.


Few things bugged me though.


1. The overuse of the word 'homey' amongst the gang members

2. When they are sat on the roof of the train, I thought I saw Willy throw the digital camera onto the tracks. 10 mins later he's looking at it??

3. If it was just as quick to go by road (which it was as the old gang members kept catching up with the train), why didn't they just try and hitch or hide in a lorry or something, rather than sit on that roof for weeks?!


Maybe I've missed something.


Overall a very good film. Glad I had the subtitles though. I speak pretty good Spanish and found the girl easy enough to understand, but he was impossible.

Sorry guys,


I just thought that it came out a little bit too late after The Thick Of It. Don't get me wrong, there were some funny scenes (Steve Coogan was a welcome surprise) but I just found the storyline a little bit baffling since it was centred on the lead up to the invasion where as the original series (I genuinely loved that) was set after the whole mess had started.


I'm going to stick my neck out here and by all means savage me guys, but I wondered if perhaps having one or two members from the West Wing would've been fun in respect of the original series being a bit of a pisstake of government politicians and their policies. I just thought it would be fun for the U.S delegation to have included members of a cast that was doing the same thing as The Thick Of It.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “  they announced the 22bn blackhole and many people said...but 9bn of that are based on decisions you made in relation to public sector pay rises.” I’d  be interested in the source of that 
    • Hello! I would be keen to hear from parents of secondary-school age in state schools of the cost of school trips overseas. Particularly interested in Kingsdale and Charter but all examples welcome. many thanks!
    • Or the government have it wrong. Certainly picking a fight with farmers, the very definition of working people, is probably not going to end well. The problem here is that Labour hung their hat on not taxing "working people" which was clearly the output of some awful focus group and clearly not the term they wanted to use. They failed to properly qualify what a working person is and it is now coming back to haunt them because the very definition of a working person is anyone who is, well, working and that covers a whole gamut of people and salaries. Don't pick a fight with farmers if you have stated you aren't going after working people because public opinion will be against you. Farmers are the backbone of any country and work so hard and yes, there are some that are incredibly well off but the majority are not and farming is a trade that gets handed down through the generations. And farmers will make their case very public in ways other groups won't.   Labour's communication has been awful but they got a free pass before the election because everyone was so focused on how awful the Tories were. But now they are in power and they are tripping themselves up because in leadership you need more than soundbites.   The "Son of a Toolmaker" is the type of thing that haunts politicians until the end of their career. Clearly someone decided to detach Keir from his grammar school, university (including Oxford), legal career, knight of the realm background. His face when everyone laughed when he mentioned it during one of the pre-election debates was a picture. He is the son of a toolmaker but you look a bit silly when people then say yes but your dad ran a tool-making company...   Coming into power on a ticket of "look how they have been behaving" and then behaving in many ways the Tories were has been a disaster for politicians of all parties. The clothing funding and access to no.10 was just a nightmare for them and in these days where today's newspaper is no longer tomorrow's chip paper the comments made about Trump (which I am sure most people can agree with) are just embarrassing.   Winter Fuel Tax has been a disaster. Yes, there are many pensioners who don't need it but those aren't going to be the ones talking to the media about how awful the winter is going to be and people only remember those shouting the loudest.   The budget was an interesting one. I was watching Theo Pathitis on TV and he had swung from the Tories to Labour ahead of the election and was talking about the impact of the Employer NI and you could tell that he was very carefully choosing his words as he knew how hard this was going to be on business and what the implications are but clearly didn't want to be left with egg on his face as he was telling everyone to vote Labour ahead of the election.   Labour were, understandably, happy to right the massive wave of Tory discontent and pre-election all of the world's ills were down to the Tories. The first speech Starmer gave after winning spoke nothing about the previous government but everything about global challenges that were going to make it tough. The challenge for Labour is they convinced people that every problem was down to the Tories and that removing them would solve everything but things are not as straight forward as that. I senses things changing when they announced the 22bn blackhole and many people said...but 9bn of that are based on decisions you made in relation to public sector pay rises. Labour are finding out, to their cost, that being in opposition is easy. Being in power is not.          
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...