Jump to content

Does replacing single with double glazing make financial sense?


Recommended Posts

I'm sceptical about the value for money arguments regarding replacing single with double glazing if the windows don't have to be replaced (e.g. because they are rotten beyond repair) and would be interested to hear any views informed by experience or professional expertise. [This is specifically about value for money - not sound insulation, the environment etc.]


My thinking is:


If 20% of heat loss for an average house is through the windows, and double glazing reduces that by a half, the maximum saving per year is around 10% of heating costs (c. ?80-100 on a 3-bed Victorian house?). Given the cost of replacing all windows with double glazing (?5-10k+?), and the more limited lifespan of double glazing (20-30yrs due to seals failing) it looks like it makes more financial sense to simply cut out draughts where possible and leave the heating turned up. Am I missing something?

No - you're not.


Loft insulation and cavity wall insulation both make more financial sense in terms of value for money.


The only other factor to bear in mind would be that good double glazing adds value to your home and makes it more likely to sell promptly.

Aye. Agreed.


I'm not sure good double glazing adds value though. Chunky PVC frames can make a period property that wasn't designed for them look awful and posh middle class folk who want to restore sash style on a traditional terrace will be pricing that in.


Most single glazed sash windows can now have timber repaired, beading and cords replaced and be draught proofed with a recessed draught proof strip for around ?250-?300 each. Much cheaper than the ?500-?800 for a double glazed sash replacement. Once redecorated these look great.


A specialist restorer (for same price above) can now use Epoxy resin like Timbabuild or similar to virtually rebuild rotting timber frames which can then be drilled , painted etc just like new wood. I've just had someone do this and it's great.


So to the OP (assuming an average non-eco victorian flat/house), I would restore your current windows and draught proof, get decent double lined curtains or blinds and get your central heating up to spec (flush your central heating system out ?250-?300, boiler serviced) to get decent heat retention.


Cavity wall insulation is good but a lot of old buildings are "single skin" just two solid bricks separating your plastered wall from outside. I once dry lined two external facing walls of a room with insulating plasterboard and that worked well.

I live in a block of flats. Nearly 3 years ago we had double glazing put in the whole block. We have had to pay ?8,500 but of course that will add the value of block should we ever leave. We have a two bedroomed flat but it is on a sort of peninsular of the block so we had windows and private balcony doors on 3 sides.

Since that day we have only put our fire on twice. So even with all that snow and nastiness, only twice did we need the fire on, when - beforehand - we had it on every day in winter!

Despite raises in fuel prices, our fuel bills are actually still less.


As long as you have a healthy efficient boiler too, all should be good.


(We had 3 years interest free to pay off the ?8,500 and had several years' notice by the way!)

womanofdulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> but a good thing is you will cut down on your

> external decorating costs. ;-)



Mmmm, is that because there is no point polishing a *urd. If you want double glazing, for goodness sake make sure that it's hardwood timber framed, otherwise you could knock ?40K+ off the value of the typical ED Victorian semi.

womanofdulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> all well having timber in a period house but in a

> purpose built flat or say a wates town house then

> upvc dg will not devalue it.


The OP quoted a 3 bed Victorian house in her example, my comment about uPVC devaluing a period property was in direct reference to that, not new build...most new builds thesse days come with uPVC anyway, therefore the devaluing argument doesn't really apply, and they tend not to be single glazed as all new builds have to conform with stringent Building Control requirements for thermal heat loss.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello everyone, We are excited to introduce our new Maths Essentials course this Summer term, designed to help students gain confidence and build strong foundations. Day: Mondays - starting, 28th April 2025 Time: 5pm to 6pm Format: Remote instructor-led Level: Beginner Ages: 9 to 16 years old Our classes are free for families receiving any form of benefit or with a household income of £30k or under. Otherwise, the term fee is £45. We also offer a bursary fund so cost is never a barrier to learning with us. For more information and to register, please visit https://www.ignitehubs.org.uk/maths Join us to succeed in Maths! Regards,   Lin Maths Essentials Summer 2025.pdf
    • "Dedicated to the purpose-built student accommodation sector. PBSA News is the leading source of news, insights and analysis for professionals, investors and stakeholders in the purpose-built student accommodation sector. With a mission to provide the latest information and foster collaboration within the rental community."   The PBSA take on the strength of the market seems much more upbeat than does the govt. research paper. Perhaps they are right or perhaps it is in their interests to talk up the market?    
    • I think a lot of people here are just speculating about empty student accommodation properties. Student accommodation developments are very popular because they provide really great rates of return for the owner. A large student accommodation owner, Unite Students, saw 97.5% occupancy across their assets in the 2024/2025 academic year. They have many properties in London; https://pbsanews.co.uk/2024/10/09/unite-students-reports-record-occupancy-rates-in-q3-2024-update/ Here's a bit from CBRE on PBSA properties in London from May 2024: https://www.cbre.co.uk/press-releases/london-plan-policy-fails-to-deliver-affordable-student-accommodation - "According to new research by CBRE and QX Global, the gap between demand for PBSA and available supply in London currently stands at 100,000 – 105,000 full-time students, underscoring how demand for student housing has outpaced supply." - The development pipeline in London isn't keeping up with the demand. Ultimately this development wouldn't be built if student accommodation wasn't in demand. It's proximity to the station means that a student could get to any number of universities easily in a short span of time. Is it ideal? No. Would more affordable housing be better? Yes. Is speculating about channel migrants occupying the space uninformed idiocy? Absolutely.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...