Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SJ - does it REALLY matter if there's the odd drop of pork fat in home-style cabbage or aubergine ?

I mean, you probably couldn't taste it and it's not a main ingredient.

I, also, don't know if there IS prok in these vegetable dishes.


I also am unsure of the correct terminology. Just like Confucius, I like to get this right.

'veggie' smarts of veggetarian food for 'veggies' but NOT for meat eaters.

'vegetarian' sounds like it's food that has no meat in it. Which anyone is intended to eat.

Is there a subtle difference between the two ? The usage makes me think so. 'Veggie' seems to have some kind of 'ownership (it's OUR food) attached to.


Don't get me wrong, I'll eat what I like regardless, but I think the ownership thing is stoopid.

Ted, what were 'rude meat eaters' saying that was rude ?

genuine question - I must have missed something.


Regarding the pork fat (theoretically) in the 'home-style cabbage', if you can't taste it or see it and animals weren't specifically killed as an ingredient for it, isn't it ethically OK to eat ? Especially if you can't taste the fat ?

Pakistanis had their name shortened, but it didn't comprise of 'ie', just the 'i' after the 'k'.

It was (is in some places) a collective term including India, Bangladesh, and, for some abusers of the term, folks of African origin.


The only reason a meat-eater would fear a vegeterian would be if they thought the campaign in their postcode was going to remove their preferred cuts from local restaurants, I reckon. As in foie gras..

He's right you know - veggie's have had their rights removed for hundreds of years. Overrun and taken against their will from their homeland they were sold into slavery, and traded like animals without basic human rights.


Even now they suffer from the legacy of that persecution, frequently locked by tradition into ghettos with little social interest, suffering systematic institutionalised discrimination.


There are even political parties generating a groundswell of support in more carnivorous parts of the country who believe them to be destroying British culture, stealing women, and living on the dole.


I've heard of veggies getting attacked on the street by gangs of youths searching for any plausible target.


Police still stop them on the street searching for peelers.


Veggies have had it hard... BUT they are at last reclaiming 'the word'.

Huguenot once again, the cure for a miserable day. That was awesome.


If one were to judge by these veggie threads, I'd have to conclude that animal products are where humans get our sense of humour from.


I generally don't make a habit of quoting Homer Simpson, but I think he summed it up when he sang "You don't make friends with sa-lad. You don't make friends with sa-lad".


Or as my husband says: vegetables are what food eats.

T.e.d


Bless ya. I used to love Food for Fiends in Brighton, I'd go there after caning it at the Zap club all week-end.


With my eyes swivelling in thier sockets I'd point at a the trays of delicious veggie food on offer, then stuff my self with a spoon of it ( maybe two )


And then afterwards I'd have a massive sh*t.


Which was nice.


NETTE:-S

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> Not to me it doesn't (quite the opposite) but if I

> was a vegetarian I'd want to be sure so I was just

> giving a heads-up


OKay


What if the Pig was actually the Chef ?


( and some of his sweat dropped onto the food )


http://image.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/265489/265489,1317161109,1/stock-vector-happy-pig-chef-vector-illustration-with-simple-gradients-all-in-a-single-layer-85503130.jpg


They're clever buggers y'kow.


Would that matter.



NETTE:-S

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...