Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I wonder if the forum users group are big enough in number, to discount the purchasing of items.

EG they might enjoy the benefits of cut price deals on insurance of houses, or group travel.

Is it worthy of a new thread?

Can you add any other ways to benefit from forum clout(?)

Advantages of large-group purchasing-discuss.

From my perspective I would be uncomfortable using the forum to bargain for discounts. Being an open forum, people are free to post any opinion and many businesses get dealt quite a harsh hand (even if it can be accurate). Businesses which extend discounts would expect more positive reviews


I'm happier when businesses offer deals off their own back - such as when the FHT and Hoopers both put on free food spreads, and the EDT has always gone out of it's way to accomodate forumites at various events even when we've been too slack to get ourselves organised


If businesses are expected to provide discounts you willget people with the most tenuous links to the forum brandishing the name in the hope of getting summat for nowt

  • 1 year later...
  • 3 weeks later...

From the Drawing Room:

Re: NHS staff - 50% higher rate of sickies


That thread in particular has become very muddled as several different strands of the argument are now running in parallel requiring a lot of concentration to keep up with the different voices.


The problem arises because this forum displays messages in chronological order.


The solution is software that creates sub-threads as a debate bifurcates.


I don't know whether sub-threading is available as an option or a plug in - I doubt it, but it might be worth a mention here in case anyone else has any thoughts or views.


If this has been the subject of a previous discussion ? I apologise.

Personally I think it works well in chronological order. You can flow the ebbs and flows, witness strands digress then unite in concert.

I find any software based around replies, especially with collapsing and expanding and substranding to be unusably bad.

The forum does have some functionality to split threads or even merge them, but it doesn't work very well and splitting can be very artificial or even arbitrary and some people might find their voice suddenly stranded in a thread not of their choosing.

I know it's far from perfect, but much of the popularity of the forum stems from it's simplicity of use and it's uncluttered nature. If it ain't broke...

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is a module available but the admin involved

> in monitoring discussions and splitting threads


We cross-posted. Just editing this to say that the systems I'm referring to carry out the sub-threading automatically - there's no need for manual splitting (although that is often available as a separate facility).


> and the subsequent confusion it can cause would

> not be worth implementing.


The whole idea is to clear up confusion - well, from the forum user's point of view. I'm sure implementing such a system on the admin side isn't a cakewalk.


> Keeping it simple works on this forum.


Fair enough. I've been spoilt by nearly twenty years with sub-threaded news readers on Usenet newsgroups. I guess this format, arcane as it seems to me, is simple enough for everyone and does the job well enough.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 8 months later...
  • 6 months later...

Hi I run a small animal boarding house and was going to advertise that we have space for guinea pigs over Christmas, however I am in Crystal Palace. I do pet sitting and dog walking in the East Dulwich area as I used to live there and that is where the majority of my clients are hence being a member on the forum. Can I post on here even though my trading address is my home address in Crystal Palace?


Kind Regards

Sarah & The Goldfish Team.

Sarah


I can't answer your query but will say "thank you" for being an exemplery business in asking permission before just randomly posting.


If only more would read the rules first and then ask questions (like you) the forum-world would be a happier place.


Bravo.

because Sarah is pretty much in the right place I'm guessing. Admin will see it


I think David was just doffing his cap to good manner - nowt wrong with that


But Sarah can always contact Admin directly via the link below if she doesn't get an answer on here

Dear Admin


In the classified sections, could we make it a rule that people should not post lots of individual ads, particularly for related items, but should group them into one ad? Over the last couple of days, in both the for sale section and the family classifieds, the front page has been almost entirely taked over by individuals selling clothes or baby items via lots of ads that could easly have been put into one advert instead.


Thanks

Trinity

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...